Can Trump Reimpose Tariffs?
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Let Trump COOK
Ben Shapiro
199.5k views
My Top 8 Trump Moments
Ben Shapiro
48.8k views
LIVE: Supreme Court WRECKS Trump's Tariffs
Ben Shapiro
58.5k views
2026 SHOCK: Trump DEPOSES Maduro!
Ben Shapiro
513.2k views
Can Trump Solve the Grocery Crisis?
Ben Shapiro
34.1k views
Is Trump WINNING The Tariff Wars?
Ben Shapiro
507.0k views
2 MUSK 2 FURIOUS: Trump vs. Musk, Redux
Ben Shapiro
248.7k views
Elon’s Farewell and Trump’s Tariff War Dead?
Ben Shapiro
199.9k views
Can Trump STOP World War III?
Ben Shapiro
178.0k views
Trump’s Saudi TRIUMPH
Ben Shapiro
154.3k views
Top Comments (10)
The warmth of collectivism isn’t working quite like he had hoped
So they start dealing out Tariff money to every Tom, Dick and Harry who presents of claim? Seems like that could open up incidents of fraud?
can someone explain the obama care and how that is equivlent to Trump's Tariffs?
This may end up inadvertently helping consumers at the grocery checkout line in the long run.
Not sure what Ben is talking about. Roberts’ ruling in the ACA lawsuit was that the individual mandate WAS a tax and so it wasn’t unconstitutional. So he was consistent in his rulings, though this was a major questions decision unlike the Obamacare one.
If watching that trump press conference he gave today didn’t change your mind on his maturity as a human being, then nothing will.
It’s bonkers to me that so many conservative Republicans want one person to unilaterally decide the multi trillion dollar industry of US trade
Just because you can do something does'nt mean you should. When you have the supermajority against tariffs and you double down, tripple down, on tariffs, you better have something going on that makes up for that bad rep. And we're still waiting on a redeeming issue.
Don't forget him
Lower court has no jurisdiction over Federal Legislation
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
The warmth of collectivism isn’t working quite like he had hoped
So they start dealing out Tariff money to every Tom, Dick and Harry who presents of claim? Seems like that could open up incidents of fraud?
can someone explain the obama care and how that is equivlent to Trump's Tariffs?
This may end up inadvertently helping consumers at the grocery checkout line in the long run.
Not sure what Ben is talking about. Roberts’ ruling in the ACA lawsuit was that the individual mandate WAS a tax and so it wasn’t unconstitutional. So he was consistent in his rulings, though this was a major questions decision unlike the Obamacare one.
If watching that trump press conference he gave today didn’t change your mind on his maturity as a human being, then nothing will.
It’s bonkers to me that so many conservative Republicans want one person to unilaterally decide the multi trillion dollar industry of US trade
Just because you can do something does'nt mean you should. When you have the supermajority against tariffs and you double down, tripple down, on tariffs, you better have something going on that makes up for that bad rep. And we're still waiting on a redeeming issue.
Don't forget him
Lower court has no jurisdiction over Federal Legislation