Krystal And Saagar DEBATE SCOTUS Trump CO Ruling
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Krystal And Saagar DEBATE SCOTUS Voting Right Act Decision
Breaking Points
81.8k views
Krystal and Saagar DEBATE: Is Totalitarianism HERE?
Breaking Points
171.6k views
Krystal And Saagar DEBATE 'Trantifa'
Breaking Points
134.3k views
Krystal and Saagar DEBATE Alligator Alcatraz
Breaking Points
98.9k views
Krystal and Saagar REACT: Trump BOMBS IRAN
Breaking Points
692.4k views
Krystal And Saagar DEBATE Trump University Crackdown
Breaking Points
71.8k views
Krystal and Saagar REACT To Trump State Of The Union
Breaking Points
221.5k views
Krystal And Saagar DEBATE Trump Ukraine Minerals Deal
Breaking Points
107.3k views
Krystal And Saagar DEBATE Pentagon PURGE
Breaking Points
119.0k views
Krystal And Saagar DEBATE Trump Union Backstabbing
Breaking Points
66.3k views
Top Comments (10)
Krystal gets mad that SCOTUS interpreted a section of Amendment 14 to serve a specific "political end", and then not five minutes later proceeds to interpret insurrection to serve a political end. Absolute Kabuki theatre
😂 Can't wait to watch this mental gymnastics class.
Imagine a Maine clerk deciding who can run for president?
I’d never hire Krystal to ever give legal advice.
Krystal, they didn’t just make up that Congress has enforcement power over the Amendment. Section 5 literally reserves the power of enforcement of the 14th Amendment to the Congress. Not a state lower court in an evidentiary hearing.
Bring on Glenn Greenwald, a former attorney, to discuss this. For the good of the show, he needs to politely embarrass Krystal.
Now imagine every state picking and choosing who is allowed on the state ballots.
Nothing says democracy like try to ban a leading candidate from the ballot!
Yo. Saagar's side eye when Krystal said naturalized citizens should be allowed to run for president... 😂😂😂 16:25
Krystal, Article 5 of the 14th Amendment says "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article [the 14th amendment]."
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Krystal gets mad that SCOTUS interpreted a section of Amendment 14 to serve a specific "political end", and then not five minutes later proceeds to interpret insurrection to serve a political end. Absolute Kabuki theatre
😂 Can't wait to watch this mental gymnastics class.
Imagine a Maine clerk deciding who can run for president?
I’d never hire Krystal to ever give legal advice.
Krystal, they didn’t just make up that Congress has enforcement power over the Amendment. Section 5 literally reserves the power of enforcement of the 14th Amendment to the Congress. Not a state lower court in an evidentiary hearing.
Bring on Glenn Greenwald, a former attorney, to discuss this. For the good of the show, he needs to politely embarrass Krystal.
Now imagine every state picking and choosing who is allowed on the state ballots.
Nothing says democracy like try to ban a leading candidate from the ballot!
Yo. Saagar's side eye when Krystal said naturalized citizens should be allowed to run for president... 😂😂😂 16:25
Krystal, Article 5 of the 14th Amendment says "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article [the 14th amendment]."