Was "Machine Learning 2.0" All Hype? The Kolmogorov-Arnold Network Explained
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Watch the GOP Media Machine Flip the Switch (w/ Lib & Learn)
The Bulwark
38.4k views
What Is Yann LeCun Cooking? JEPA Explained Simply
bycloud
50.7k views
Ken Burns Explains the Revolution’s WARNING for America
Legal AF
43.0k views
She Reported Her Roommate ‘Missing’ — Then Police Learned About the Chainsaw
Law&Crime Network
1.2m views
Art as Propaganda: Great Art Explained: Napoleon Crossing the Alps by Jacques-Louis David
Great Art Explained
67.6k views
I'm done with the AI hype
NetworkChuck
200.5k views
Why would anyone let LLMs predict 4 tokens at once? Multi-Token Prediction Explained
bycloud
55.8k views
THE PENGUIN Batman 2 Ending Explained | New Villain & Everything We Know About The New Movie
Heavy Spoilers
140.8k views
1 Million Tiny Experts in an AI? Fine-Grained MoE Explained
bycloud
54.6k views
LLM Attention That Expands At Inference? Test Time Training Explained
bycloud
50.0k views
Top Comments (10)
Still waiting to wake up and realized all of this was just a dream.
What KAN is really cool for in my opinion is to find mathematical functions between data where there didn't exist any in the past. And since we know a lot about mathematical optimisation and things like the Taylor/Fourier series, we could theoretically calculate the input-output relationship much more cheaply (inference becomes commodity). Training would be more expensive however
Ok, but when Kan we use it? :^)
I cannot believe My Little Pony powers the AIs that I regularly use.
Is it KAN-enough? We don't know but we'll find out eventually!
Streamline AI task delegation with HubSpot's Free Playbook: https://clickhubspot.com/9yu and check out my newsletter 😎 https://mail.bycloud.ai/
In mathematics we have "Generalized linear models". The simple explanation is that we know linear regression. What they forget to teach (not always) is that in order for that to work, all parameters and the result should have the should have the same distribution. For example Normal. What happens when they dont. We have to transform the output of the regression from one Distribution to another (or the other way around). This is easy for exponential distributions. Those S functions (or relu) are transformers from Normal to Categorical (we call that logistic regression). But that is not alway accurate ofcourse. It has been proven good enough though. In theory we could have different transform function that better map between those distributions. So the idea is pretty simple and I guess for many cases where logistic regression is obvious, it will fallback to obvious S-like functions. It would be interesting if that could be adaptive. Mean starting with simple Relus and by some criteria increase the Spline points etc
this would be cool to integrate into the mlp frameworks we have. it would be cool having something that inst just linear regression. i think what makes kans stand out its how theyre output can dynamically change. if we could think having this alongside transformers would be sick
I can imagine a professor saying "Yes I KAN" "No you KAN't" "Yes I KAN"
In a nutshell, we still need more memory. xd
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Still waiting to wake up and realized all of this was just a dream.
What KAN is really cool for in my opinion is to find mathematical functions between data where there didn't exist any in the past. And since we know a lot about mathematical optimisation and things like the Taylor/Fourier series, we could theoretically calculate the input-output relationship much more cheaply (inference becomes commodity). Training would be more expensive however
Ok, but when Kan we use it? :^)
I cannot believe My Little Pony powers the AIs that I regularly use.
Is it KAN-enough? We don't know but we'll find out eventually!
Streamline AI task delegation with HubSpot's Free Playbook: https://clickhubspot.com/9yu and check out my newsletter 😎 https://mail.bycloud.ai/
In mathematics we have "Generalized linear models". The simple explanation is that we know linear regression. What they forget to teach (not always) is that in order for that to work, all parameters and the result should have the should have the same distribution. For example Normal. What happens when they dont. We have to transform the output of the regression from one Distribution to another (or the other way around). This is easy for exponential distributions. Those S functions (or relu) are transformers from Normal to Categorical (we call that logistic regression). But that is not alway accurate ofcourse. It has been proven good enough though. In theory we could have different transform function that better map between those distributions. So the idea is pretty simple and I guess for many cases where logistic regression is obvious, it will fallback to obvious S-like functions. It would be interesting if that could be adaptive. Mean starting with simple Relus and by some criteria increase the Spline points etc
this would be cool to integrate into the mlp frameworks we have. it would be cool having something that inst just linear regression. i think what makes kans stand out its how theyre output can dynamically change. if we could think having this alongside transformers would be sick
I can imagine a professor saying "Yes I KAN" "No you KAN't" "Yes I KAN"
In a nutshell, we still need more memory. xd