Paul Davies - What are Observers?
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Daniel Chamovitz - Are Plants Sentient?
Closer To Truth
48.7k views
David Chalmers - What Things are Conscious?
Closer To Truth
45.5k views
Saul Perlmutter - Why Did Our Universe Begin?
Closer To Truth
114.6k views
Seth Lloyd - Physics of the Observer
Closer To Truth
53.0k views
Edward Witten - What are Breakthroughs in Science?
Closer To Truth
487.7k views
Paul Davies - Why There is ‘Something’ Rather than ‘Nothing’?
Closer To Truth
87.4k views
Sam Parnia - What Do Near Death Experiences Mean?
Closer To Truth
87.6k views
Arnold B. Scheibel - What Makes Brains Conscious?
Closer To Truth
69.6k views
David Albert - Why Is There Anything At All?
Closer To Truth
53.8k views
Paul Davies - Gap Between Non-Life and Life
Closer To Truth
120.5k views
Top Comments (10)
Thank you for saying in layman's terms.... often people are unable to just explain within there mind, observation, and drowning in others explanations.
"Why is observation in the quantum world still a mystery?", we aren't ready for the Supermind.
One of the few physicists who properly grasps the difference between physics and metaphysics and recognizes the plausibility of the knowledge claims of mysticism. I wonder why they both assume that consciousness is emergent. I wonder even more why they imagine any physical phenomena is fundamental. I suppose it's a habit. These ideas don't wash in metaphysics, which is to say when we give them a bit of thought. .
I could listen to this guest talk about lawnmowers for 12 hours straight
I love Paul Davies and his clarity.
This needs part 2
Observer, know Thyself! Davies is a clear and penetrating thinker. A wonderful conversation.
Imagine experiencing yourself right now for a few minutes being the beam me up Scottie bit of Startrek.
I watched this for almost 10 times to grasp these topics. Because I'm not an english speaker struggling to understand English and the complex topic.
I love the way Robert looks at Paul 😊 Both men are great thinkers
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Thank you for saying in layman's terms.... often people are unable to just explain within there mind, observation, and drowning in others explanations.
"Why is observation in the quantum world still a mystery?", we aren't ready for the Supermind.
One of the few physicists who properly grasps the difference between physics and metaphysics and recognizes the plausibility of the knowledge claims of mysticism. I wonder why they both assume that consciousness is emergent. I wonder even more why they imagine any physical phenomena is fundamental. I suppose it's a habit. These ideas don't wash in metaphysics, which is to say when we give them a bit of thought. .
I could listen to this guest talk about lawnmowers for 12 hours straight
I love Paul Davies and his clarity.
This needs part 2
Observer, know Thyself! Davies is a clear and penetrating thinker. A wonderful conversation.
Imagine experiencing yourself right now for a few minutes being the beam me up Scottie bit of Startrek.
I watched this for almost 10 times to grasp these topics. Because I'm not an english speaker struggling to understand English and the complex topic.
I love the way Robert looks at Paul 😊 Both men are great thinkers