Why This Truck Driver Was Stunned by Liberal Elites in 1968
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Trump admin now DETERMINED to END THIS SHOW
David Pakman Show
34.0k views
I was STUNNED by Brian Tyler Cohen's demands
David Pakman Show
85.6k views
MAGA STUNNED as Trump nominee goes SILENT
David Pakman Show
22.2k views
Furious Rogan Reads This File Live As Trump Stunned By Betrayal
Jack Cocchiarella
318.4k views
Trump gets STUNNED by the DATA HE FEARED MOST
Legal AF
34.0k views
Trump has never been this dangerous
David Pakman Show
85.5k views
This is why you don’t interview Trump supporters
David Pakman Show
144.3k views
STUNNED rally crowd SILENT as Trump rambles
David Pakman Show
363.4k views
Lauren Boebert has to go into hiding after this
David Pakman Show
256.1k views
When 1970 Changed Weed in America Forever
David Hoffman
42.3k views
Top Comments (10)
It's always about money and power. Elites think they're obligated. Thanks for this clip.
These damn bots... Anyways, quality and insightful vids as always, Mr. Hoffman. It's so fascinating hearing what people experienced and felt in the sixties, and then checking that against the world we live in today.
I remember reading something in high school about how Nixon was essentially a 1920s Progressive. I think I was in the library and that day I was looking up books on Nixon and I think it was a book attempting to psychoanalyze him because it went into his childhood of being raised by a strong woman and weak father. And that’s about all I can contribute at this time.
From an ancient era in which a guy automatically wore a jacket and tie if he knew he was going to be interviewed on camera. Paradise lost. Progress isn’t all one-way, alas.
He's a thoughtful, intelligent person who explains quite well a variety of topics and reactions. Although the premise is about 'liberalism', he does not seem to espouse any particular viewpoint. He does make the case for the pitfalls of generalization. It's handy to label an individual or a group, but reality is more nuanced. I often make the analogy to religion. Even Christians, who began as an offshoot of an earlier version, can't agree on what defines them. Even that general original group is splintered into a myriad of variations that disagree quite violently with the rest. It's about power, money and control. That generality always holds
I suspect that Thomas Sowell would take issue with a lot of the things this guy said.
What's great about all these old clips is that it shows us that problems of today are very old, and there were plenty of people back then who thought they knew how to fix them, just as today their are those who think they know how to fix them.
Thanks for the interview David.
Sure wish we could watch the entire series "Making Sense of the Sixties". It seems that the complete programme is not available anymore? 😢
Well spoken Chap
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
It's always about money and power. Elites think they're obligated. Thanks for this clip.
These damn bots... Anyways, quality and insightful vids as always, Mr. Hoffman. It's so fascinating hearing what people experienced and felt in the sixties, and then checking that against the world we live in today.
I remember reading something in high school about how Nixon was essentially a 1920s Progressive. I think I was in the library and that day I was looking up books on Nixon and I think it was a book attempting to psychoanalyze him because it went into his childhood of being raised by a strong woman and weak father. And that’s about all I can contribute at this time.
From an ancient era in which a guy automatically wore a jacket and tie if he knew he was going to be interviewed on camera. Paradise lost. Progress isn’t all one-way, alas.
He's a thoughtful, intelligent person who explains quite well a variety of topics and reactions. Although the premise is about 'liberalism', he does not seem to espouse any particular viewpoint. He does make the case for the pitfalls of generalization. It's handy to label an individual or a group, but reality is more nuanced. I often make the analogy to religion. Even Christians, who began as an offshoot of an earlier version, can't agree on what defines them. Even that general original group is splintered into a myriad of variations that disagree quite violently with the rest. It's about power, money and control. That generality always holds
I suspect that Thomas Sowell would take issue with a lot of the things this guy said.
What's great about all these old clips is that it shows us that problems of today are very old, and there were plenty of people back then who thought they knew how to fix them, just as today their are those who think they know how to fix them.
Thanks for the interview David.
Sure wish we could watch the entire series "Making Sense of the Sixties". It seems that the complete programme is not available anymore? 😢
Well spoken Chap