I Created the Same Animation in Every AI Video Generator
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
The Most Anticipated Gemini Feature is Here
Futurepedia
34.4k views
The 7 Levels of AI User (and how to level up)
Futurepedia
95.4k views
Every New Google AI Update in One Video (NotebookLM, Gemini, and much more)
Futurepedia
74.5k views
How to Create Lifelike Cinematic AI Videos in 2026 (full course)
Futurepedia
140.4k views
Vibe Coding Fundamentals in 19 Minutes With Emergent AI
Futurepedia
48.9k views
The AI Tool EVERYONE Should Be Using
Futurepedia
118.9k views
I Tested Every AI Image Editor. This is the Best
Futurepedia
100.7k views
YouTube CEO Neal Mohan on AI, Censorship & the Future of Creators
All-In Podcast
63.6k views
Google Nano Banana for Video - 10+ INSANE Use Cases
Futurepedia
89.9k views
Master ChatGPT in One Video
Futurepedia
90.9k views
Top Comments (10)
These models (Sora, Veo 3.1, Kling 2.6, LTX‑2, Wan, Seedance, etc.) all have totally different prompt best‑practices. Using one set of generic prompts is really a test of how they handle bad prompting, not what they’re actually capable of when you follow each model’s own guidelines.
I can´t believe he never noticed that most of the tentacles (except for Hailou) morphed into human hands.
the crying photo ones are wierd because most of them theyre looking at the back of the photo
Overall this was helpful and well done and I know it was a lot of work. But I gotta say: some of your analysis was baffling. Perfect bartender tentacles that pour in the wrong drink: "FAIL". Tentacles appearing like a beard out of nowhere and turning into hands and arms: "It did great!!!". Manticore's wings vanish completely and it turns into a lion: "Grok did amazing!!!" Seedance keeps the manticore and hits accurate: It scores lower than Grok. You actually highlighted Grok as standing out in two places (bartender and manticore) where it failed pretty obviously. And you specifically identified the Manticore as the complex monster test then gave Grok a pass for not keeping it accurate. It was confusing.
👉 Join the fastest-growing AI education platform! Try it free and get instant access to 30+ top-rated courses in AI: https://bit.ly/futurepediaSL
liked how you designed the Video with the Ranking and all. Was definitely one of your most fun videos. Good job, Kevin!
2:01 he got that Michael Kidd gilcrest 😂😂😂😂
This is arguably the most useful benchmark video I've seen this year. Seeing Veo 3.1 and Kling 2.6 side-by-side really highlights the strengths of each model for cinematic movement. Thanks for the massive effort! 👏
When people are fan boys of a model or anything they make up a win for the product or company.
Solid comparison, thanks for putting in the work. For keeping the same characters and style consistent across longer animations, I’ve been using Anistudio lately — its agents make the whole pipeline feel way smoother with way less manual tweaking.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
These models (Sora, Veo 3.1, Kling 2.6, LTX‑2, Wan, Seedance, etc.) all have totally different prompt best‑practices. Using one set of generic prompts is really a test of how they handle bad prompting, not what they’re actually capable of when you follow each model’s own guidelines.
I can´t believe he never noticed that most of the tentacles (except for Hailou) morphed into human hands.
the crying photo ones are wierd because most of them theyre looking at the back of the photo
Overall this was helpful and well done and I know it was a lot of work. But I gotta say: some of your analysis was baffling. Perfect bartender tentacles that pour in the wrong drink: "FAIL". Tentacles appearing like a beard out of nowhere and turning into hands and arms: "It did great!!!". Manticore's wings vanish completely and it turns into a lion: "Grok did amazing!!!" Seedance keeps the manticore and hits accurate: It scores lower than Grok. You actually highlighted Grok as standing out in two places (bartender and manticore) where it failed pretty obviously. And you specifically identified the Manticore as the complex monster test then gave Grok a pass for not keeping it accurate. It was confusing.
👉 Join the fastest-growing AI education platform! Try it free and get instant access to 30+ top-rated courses in AI: https://bit.ly/futurepediaSL
liked how you designed the Video with the Ranking and all. Was definitely one of your most fun videos. Good job, Kevin!
2:01 he got that Michael Kidd gilcrest 😂😂😂😂
This is arguably the most useful benchmark video I've seen this year. Seeing Veo 3.1 and Kling 2.6 side-by-side really highlights the strengths of each model for cinematic movement. Thanks for the massive effort! 👏
When people are fan boys of a model or anything they make up a win for the product or company.
Solid comparison, thanks for putting in the work. For keeping the same characters and style consistent across longer animations, I’ve been using Anistudio lately — its agents make the whole pipeline feel way smoother with way less manual tweaking.