Theodore Postol: The Secrets of Russia's Oreshnik Missile
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Russia Unleashes Oreshnik, More Strikes Planned
The Duran
75.2k views
Douglas Macgregor: NATO Attacked Russia; U.S. Being Pushed Out of the Middle East
Glenn Diesen
132.0k views
Theodore Postol: Iran Can Now Build 10-20 Nuclear Weapons - U.S. Must Negotiate
Glenn Diesen
58.3k views
George Beebe: Europe-Russia War as the U.S. Pulls Back?
Glenn Diesen
19.4k views
Sergey Karaganov: How Russia Will Win the New World War
Glenn Diesen
80.3k views
Theodore Postol: Iran's Missiles & Drones Were Underestimated
Glenn Diesen
147.3k views
Theodore Postol: Iran Already Has Nuclear Deterrent to Israeli Nuclear Strike
Glenn Diesen
214.0k views
Stanislav Krapivnik: The Iran Lesson - Russia Will Retaliate & Deter
Glenn Diesen
100.0k views
Chas Freeman: The Emerging Iran-Russia-China Axis & Israel's Possible Demise
Glenn Diesen
226.2k views
Richard Sakwa: The Russo-Ukrainian War: Follies of Empire
Glenn Diesen
42.5k views
Top Comments (10)
Well, if Oreshnik is just PR can I see pictures of aftermath at YuzhMash plant and Lvov Air Repair plant? Please?
The Oreshnik may be conventional, but it’s certainly not ordinary.
I think the #1 indication that proves this weapon does a ton of damage is that the US/Ukrainians scrub all pictures/video/satallite images from being seen. If there was little damage they’d show everything.
Why dont we see damage of targeted site? If oreshnik wasnt a big deal kiev had share many more information about those attack+satellite images
Can we see the results of the strike in Lvov. Then we will figure out how powerful is this weapon.
I suspect they have other things greater than hazel.
If it's a secret it wouldn't be revealed on YT.
Prof. Postol. How come we have never seen any footage from the sites Oreshniks have hit so far? I’m confident that if the damage has been minor we would have seen pics nonstop by now.
He was probably talking about the Oreshnik attacks that only had kinetic projectiles but Oreshnik could definitely be equipped with nuclear MIRV's.
I’m not sure that Postol’s intent is to denigrate the technology; but rather to opine that conventional use of this weapon does not warrant a nuclear response. This is how I interpret his remarks, anyway.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Well, if Oreshnik is just PR can I see pictures of aftermath at YuzhMash plant and Lvov Air Repair plant? Please?
The Oreshnik may be conventional, but it’s certainly not ordinary.
I think the #1 indication that proves this weapon does a ton of damage is that the US/Ukrainians scrub all pictures/video/satallite images from being seen. If there was little damage they’d show everything.
Why dont we see damage of targeted site? If oreshnik wasnt a big deal kiev had share many more information about those attack+satellite images
Can we see the results of the strike in Lvov. Then we will figure out how powerful is this weapon.
I suspect they have other things greater than hazel.
If it's a secret it wouldn't be revealed on YT.
Prof. Postol. How come we have never seen any footage from the sites Oreshniks have hit so far? I’m confident that if the damage has been minor we would have seen pics nonstop by now.
He was probably talking about the Oreshnik attacks that only had kinetic projectiles but Oreshnik could definitely be equipped with nuclear MIRV's.
I’m not sure that Postol’s intent is to denigrate the technology; but rather to opine that conventional use of this weapon does not warrant a nuclear response. This is how I interpret his remarks, anyway.