Navigate Select ESC Close

Should CFP Change The G5 Protocol? - Josh Pate's College Football Show

2025-12-22 Sports
48.9k
1.3k
715

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

The College Football Playoff saw JMU and Tulane get blown out by Oregon and Ole Miss, and on Josh Pate's College Football Show Ep 700 Josh Pate delivered his initial reaction. Should we see G5 teams in the College Football Playoff? Could we see an entire separate G5 Playoff structure one day? What do we make of teams like Tulane and James Madison being in the CFP while teams like Notre Dame and Vanderbilt are left out? Let us know what you think in the comments below and be sure to SUBSCRIBE to the channel and CLICK THE BELL for notifications as we bring you multiple live shows per week! #CFP #JoshPate #Predictions SUBSCRIBE to the Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/josh-pates-college-football-show/id1485905502 Twitter: https://twitter.com/JoshPateCFB Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/JoshPateCFB/ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@joshpatecfb

Top Comments (10)

@falconssufferer283 2025-12-22

There's another concept from pro soccer that could help bridge the gap: player transfer fees. If P4 schools had to pay G5 schools to get their players in the portal, G5 schools could reinvest into their programs and better compensate their remaining players/coaches and incentivize them to stay. I think that's fair. If a G5 school invested the resources into recruiting and developing someone, they should be entitled to compensation. Btw this happens with real world employment contracts all the time.

161 19 replies
@stevereader2029 2025-12-22

I’m not for any playoff selection criteria that factors in media biased preseason rankings. Let the best 12 or 16 teams play based strictly on in season results, regardless of conference championships. No rankings until at least week 8. You don’t get credit for beating overhyped teams in week 1 if they suck after 8 weeks.

63 15 replies
@sunsin1592 2025-12-22

It's an invitational, not a playoff. In the latter, one actually plays their way in and entry isn't determined by a biased committee. So either just call this an invitational or create an actual playoff(s) where entry is simply determined on the field.

23 1 replies
@BrianGlaze 2025-12-22

Criteria for playoff selection definitely needs to be updated and it should have a consistent and measurable metric that is easily pointed to for everyone involved (committee and fans).

20 4 replies
@jprant6710 2025-12-22

i know i dont believe that notre dame should automatically get in cfp if finish in top 12 thats moe preferential treatment - how is that equal?

7 2 replies
@davewallace2992 2025-12-22

We need a Pate composed list of all the different goals being pursued by all the interested parties…in the context of a “fair” or “rational” playoff system…the schools, conferences, and fans…or more if there are any. The pursuit of fairness across all those metrics are NOT the same pursuits. But who gets the final say, is THAT fair, and how is that changed if possible?

5
@Daviamz3 2025-12-22

One question for you sir. Or heck the whole class How would you restructure FBS like would the ACC/B12/Mt. West/American even be able to compete for a national championship or would they be like an FBS TIER 2 Kinda thing

1 1 replies
@robertburnett768 2025-12-22

Great video, Josh. I agree with everything you said. I too am a college football fan and this take is spot on! Keep up the great work!

0
@truthlevato 2025-12-22

Great take and great approach to the debate. I've caked JP out several times but this is excellent logic and presentation.

0
@mmg_hatboy 2025-12-27

New subscriber. Really enjoy your content. Be blessed.

0

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot