Does Space Emerge From A Holographic Boundary?
Related videos
Black Holes. Explained. For 1.5 Hours.
PBS Space Time
94.2k views
At What Point Does Spacetime Become Quantum?
PBS Space Time
521.8k views
Your DNA's Codes Are (Probably) From Outer Space
PBS Space Time
754.2k views
Does Timescapes DISPROVE Dark Energy?
PBS Space Time
594.1k views
Does Infinity - Infinity = an Electron?
PBS Space Time
590.7k views
Does the Planck Length Break E=MC^2?
PBS Space Time
610.9k views
Do Black Holes Have to Be Black?
PBS Space Time
302.4k views
Does Antimatter Create Anti-Gravity?
PBS Space Time
836.4k views
Does Axionic Dark Matter Bind Galaxies Together?
PBS Space Time
454.7k views
What If Black Holes ARE Dark Energy?
PBS Space Time
953.8k views
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Black Holes. Explained. For 1.5 Hours.
PBS Space Time
94.2k views
At What Point Does Spacetime Become Quantum?
PBS Space Time
521.8k views
Your DNA's Codes Are (Probably) From Outer Space
PBS Space Time
754.2k views
Does Timescapes DISPROVE Dark Energy?
PBS Space Time
594.1k views
Does Infinity - Infinity = an Electron?
PBS Space Time
590.7k views
Does the Planck Length Break E=MC^2?
PBS Space Time
610.9k views
Do Black Holes Have to Be Black?
PBS Space Time
302.4k views
Does Antimatter Create Anti-Gravity?
PBS Space Time
836.4k views
Does Axionic Dark Matter Bind Galaxies Together?
PBS Space Time
454.7k views
What If Black Holes ARE Dark Energy?
PBS Space Time
953.8k views
Top Comments (10)
Those Physicists, always projecting. 😂
For the casual viewer feeling like they're having trouble following along, just know that I did my master's thesis on a topic based on the AdS/CFT correspondence, and I still feel like I struggle to properly wrap my head around all of it... Kudos to PBS spacetime for fighting to make it more accessible
Hey Matt et al., I've been a viewer since y'all started back in 2015. Never commented, and I wish I had the money to join the Patreon, but I just wanted to say that I appreciate how much this series breaks my brain every week. I'm a big Brian Greene guy, and, even so, I feel as though I understand so little but love the content so much I can't stop myself from coming back. Thank you!
The whole “size scales lead to a third dimension” thing never made any sense no matter how hard I tried, but your example of the “effective radius” and the differing shell sizes finally made it click! Absolutely wild!
Can't wait to get reminded again next time why this is the best channel I've ever discovered.
That was quite interesting. Not sure how far you really can take the analogy, but coming from an IT background, that "multiple seemingly different models describing the exact same thing" made me immediately think how you (in principle) can describe an application by giving its behavior and functionality, OR by listing its source code, OR by describing how the electricity flows through the hardware circuits. Vastly different descriptions that seem to have nothing in common, yet all describing the exact same thing. Nor can you really say which of these is the "real one" as it's more a switch in your point-of-view and which description fits your purpose. If it's anything sorta-like this, yes, makes sense. Though, always have to be careful about analogies, especially when they are of something outside your own field of expertise 🙂 but can be a useful tool when trying to understand things.
I understand less than 1% but I am still so happy that this dude is talking and I get to hear it.
When I watch PBS Space Time, I really do think I should be outside bashing rocks together
You know a topic is truly complex is PBS needs to make a playlist for it 😀 I mean, he explained the new paper about their possibly not being a Singularity at the center of a black hole in just one episode.
I can't help seeing our true source selves dance on the cosmic Plato's cave wall, where the story is flipped, the shadows are the casters of players, not the other way around. The projector is inside the cave, made from the soup of fundamental shadow code, projecting an emergent representation that we consider... ...Reality. Additional: Science channels like this have filled a void within me, thank you for projecting some wonderful education and perspectives my way <3 You guys are so so so appreciated.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Those Physicists, always projecting. 😂
For the casual viewer feeling like they're having trouble following along, just know that I did my master's thesis on a topic based on the AdS/CFT correspondence, and I still feel like I struggle to properly wrap my head around all of it... Kudos to PBS spacetime for fighting to make it more accessible
Hey Matt et al., I've been a viewer since y'all started back in 2015. Never commented, and I wish I had the money to join the Patreon, but I just wanted to say that I appreciate how much this series breaks my brain every week. I'm a big Brian Greene guy, and, even so, I feel as though I understand so little but love the content so much I can't stop myself from coming back. Thank you!
The whole “size scales lead to a third dimension” thing never made any sense no matter how hard I tried, but your example of the “effective radius” and the differing shell sizes finally made it click! Absolutely wild!
Can't wait to get reminded again next time why this is the best channel I've ever discovered.
That was quite interesting. Not sure how far you really can take the analogy, but coming from an IT background, that "multiple seemingly different models describing the exact same thing" made me immediately think how you (in principle) can describe an application by giving its behavior and functionality, OR by listing its source code, OR by describing how the electricity flows through the hardware circuits. Vastly different descriptions that seem to have nothing in common, yet all describing the exact same thing. Nor can you really say which of these is the "real one" as it's more a switch in your point-of-view and which description fits your purpose. If it's anything sorta-like this, yes, makes sense. Though, always have to be careful about analogies, especially when they are of something outside your own field of expertise 🙂 but can be a useful tool when trying to understand things.
I understand less than 1% but I am still so happy that this dude is talking and I get to hear it.
When I watch PBS Space Time, I really do think I should be outside bashing rocks together
You know a topic is truly complex is PBS needs to make a playlist for it 😀 I mean, he explained the new paper about their possibly not being a Singularity at the center of a black hole in just one episode.
I can't help seeing our true source selves dance on the cosmic Plato's cave wall, where the story is flipped, the shadows are the casters of players, not the other way around. The projector is inside the cave, made from the soup of fundamental shadow code, projecting an emergent representation that we consider... ...Reality. Additional: Science channels like this have filled a void within me, thank you for projecting some wonderful education and perspectives my way <3 You guys are so so so appreciated.