LIVE | Karen Read Motions to compel, to Exclude ARRCA, and to examine the Lexus!
Related videos
LIVE COURT | UT v. Kouri Richins - Pre-Trial Hearing and Motions.
Emily D. Baker
66.9k views
Karen Read Wants Her Lexus and Sidebars. Sarah Boone loses another one.
Emily D. Baker
136.1k views
MA v. Karen Read Retrial Day 29 - Dr. Wolfe ARCCA Testimony. Mistrial Motion and Voir Dire.
Emily D. Baker
596.8k views
MA v. Karen Read Retrial Day 13 - The Higgins Texts and Sgt. Bukhenik Cross-Examination cont.
Emily D. Baker
547.8k views
MA v. Karen Read Retrial Day 7 - Jen McCabe told the FBI what? Cross Examination begins.
Emily D. Baker
518.9k views
MA v. Karen Read Retrial Day 6 - Jen McCabe Takes The Stand. ARCCA Emotional Rollercoaster!
Emily D. Baker
465.3k views
MA v. Karen Read Retrial Day 3 - Karen Read Interviews and Texts come into evidence.
Emily D. Baker
340.9k views
LIVE COURT | Legal Coverage Karen Read Motions Hearing.
Emily D. Baker
197.7k views
LIVE COURT | Legal Analysis of Bryan Kohberger Motions Hearing.
Emily D. Baker
195.3k views
LIVE COURT | Karen Read Pre-Trial Hearing, Motions and New Rulings.
Emily D. Baker
211.1k views
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
LIVE COURT | UT v. Kouri Richins - Pre-Trial Hearing and Motions.
Emily D. Baker
66.9k views
Karen Read Wants Her Lexus and Sidebars. Sarah Boone loses another one.
Emily D. Baker
136.1k views
MA v. Karen Read Retrial Day 29 - Dr. Wolfe ARCCA Testimony. Mistrial Motion and Voir Dire.
Emily D. Baker
596.8k views
MA v. Karen Read Retrial Day 13 - The Higgins Texts and Sgt. Bukhenik Cross-Examination cont.
Emily D. Baker
547.8k views
MA v. Karen Read Retrial Day 7 - Jen McCabe told the FBI what? Cross Examination begins.
Emily D. Baker
518.9k views
MA v. Karen Read Retrial Day 6 - Jen McCabe Takes The Stand. ARCCA Emotional Rollercoaster!
Emily D. Baker
465.3k views
MA v. Karen Read Retrial Day 3 - Karen Read Interviews and Texts come into evidence.
Emily D. Baker
340.9k views
LIVE COURT | Legal Coverage Karen Read Motions Hearing.
Emily D. Baker
197.7k views
LIVE COURT | Legal Analysis of Bryan Kohberger Motions Hearing.
Emily D. Baker
195.3k views
LIVE COURT | Karen Read Pre-Trial Hearing, Motions and New Rulings.
Emily D. Baker
211.1k views
Top Comments (10)
If Brennan wants an animal expert to say a dog didn’t cause those wounds then I want a mechanic to say that a car did. That’s essentially what he’s asking for.
Brennan: We didn’t receive discovery because The Court wouldn’t allow the defense to obtain discovery and as such the defense should be punished. Absolutely asinine.
Why is the prosecutions case about disproving the alternative theories the defense is raising. How about prove a car hit a person and how it could have happened and caused the minimal damage it caused. If the theory is sound the physics will line up. I’m at the point they don’t care about convicting this woman all they care about is defending their law enforcement who at best are incompetent and defending their methods which at best terrible. All you have to do is show a plausible method of how the car hit him if you can’t then that says all you need to know about these folks.
Living for Dr Russell clapping back via affidavit. Further affiant sayeth naught. Boom, roasted!
OMG this was SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCH a great Live Stream!!!! Thank you EDB and MODs - you rock!!!!
Ian Runkle gave a very good explaination of why a dog on dog bite will look radically different to a dog on human bite. The fur stops a dog's skin from being torn apart as easily as bare skin, resulting in deep puncture wounds, not tears. I've also seen this on dog on sheep bite wounds. Made total sense why the sweatshirt had puncture holes as wouldn't easily rip; as soft human skin would, and did once the teeth penetrated through the sweatshirt and then ripped through flesh.
My friend has five school age children and we told them cursive language was a secret way for adults to communicate .they really wanted to learn
OMG. Dying. “Fuck that sentence”😂😂😂
1:47:02 FUCK THAT SENTENCE 🤣😂😆 I replayed that bit over SO many times 🤣
I just found out that the jurors completely disregarded testimony from the “crash daddys” solely because they didn’t know who hired them for the case. Wow!!! Mind blown! I guess “and stuff” made more sense to them???? Like wth literally W T H!!!!
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
If Brennan wants an animal expert to say a dog didn’t cause those wounds then I want a mechanic to say that a car did. That’s essentially what he’s asking for.
Brennan: We didn’t receive discovery because The Court wouldn’t allow the defense to obtain discovery and as such the defense should be punished. Absolutely asinine.
Why is the prosecutions case about disproving the alternative theories the defense is raising. How about prove a car hit a person and how it could have happened and caused the minimal damage it caused. If the theory is sound the physics will line up. I’m at the point they don’t care about convicting this woman all they care about is defending their law enforcement who at best are incompetent and defending their methods which at best terrible. All you have to do is show a plausible method of how the car hit him if you can’t then that says all you need to know about these folks.
Living for Dr Russell clapping back via affidavit. Further affiant sayeth naught. Boom, roasted!
OMG this was SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCH a great Live Stream!!!! Thank you EDB and MODs - you rock!!!!
Ian Runkle gave a very good explaination of why a dog on dog bite will look radically different to a dog on human bite. The fur stops a dog's skin from being torn apart as easily as bare skin, resulting in deep puncture wounds, not tears. I've also seen this on dog on sheep bite wounds. Made total sense why the sweatshirt had puncture holes as wouldn't easily rip; as soft human skin would, and did once the teeth penetrated through the sweatshirt and then ripped through flesh.
My friend has five school age children and we told them cursive language was a secret way for adults to communicate .they really wanted to learn
OMG. Dying. “Fuck that sentence”😂😂😂
1:47:02 FUCK THAT SENTENCE 🤣😂😆 I replayed that bit over SO many times 🤣
I just found out that the jurors completely disregarded testimony from the “crash daddys” solely because they didn’t know who hired them for the case. Wow!!! Mind blown! I guess “and stuff” made more sense to them???? Like wth literally W T H!!!!