Ladybird On Swift vs Rust

Swift supports OOP because it requires backwards compatibility with Objective-C, but “idiomatic” Swift is more based around using structs and protocols (traits) than using classes and inheritance. When you do use classes, there are a lot of guardrails to prevent you from thread-safety footguns etc. However, having an “escape hatch” to OOP is actually a useful thing to have when dealing with certain kinds of APIs or applications.

After Swift is accepted worldwide. Apple : Domain Expansion

This is the first time I see the Changelog guys, always just listen to the audio version. They do not look like they sound at all.

Elixir is one of those langs that takes you a good while to love it, its painful, its new, but it does what its trying to do, to perfection

Function pattern matching is from Haskell. Yes it’s great to use.

Chris Lattner is just goated. Dude really cares about API so any language he touches probably feels nice to write.

Yep, the DOM is OOP and Inheritance... so it makes sense that a non-OOP language would be difficult to implement a DOM in.

When I tried Elixir, that function argument pattern matching really blew my mind. Its meta programming capabilities are pretty great as well.

Oh how the turnes have tabled

Man i got this video recommendation after FUTO's video of ladybird. Kling got jacked up a lot, seems like his muscles are directly proportional to passing test cases.