AI: Grappling with a New Kind of Intelligence
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Ask Brian Greene LIVE Q&A
World Science Festival
70.1k views
Code to Cure: AI and the Future of Health
World Science Festival
42.3k views
AI Creativity: Genius or Gimmick?
World Science Festival
33.6k views
Can AI Read Your Mind?
World Science Festival
54.2k views
Is Dark Energy Decaying?
World Science Festival
187.7k views
Why a Forefather of AI Fears the Future
World Science Festival
145.3k views
AI and Quantum Computing: Glimpsing the Near Future
World Science Festival
548.8k views
Intelligent Thinking About Artificial Intelligence
World Science Festival
148.6k views
Until the End of Time: Mind, Matter and Meaning
World Science Festival
208.7k views
The New Golden Age of Space Exploration
World Science Festival
110.8k views
Top Comments (10)
Can we just take a second to acknowledge how fortunate we are to get to watch such content - for free? Thanks Brian.
This conversation is so precious, it's rare that we can get quality ones like that with different voices that have their chance to express their views with clarity. For me there's a lot of ambiguity about what's the right thing to do in all this in terms of regulations, slowing, open-sourcing, etc. But one IS for sure, conversations like this are definitely very helpful. Thank you WSF and hope to see more like it in the near future!
It's too late to un-open-source AI. We already have it. Anyone who can turn maths into code can build their own LLM. And that's a lot of people. It's impossible to regulate solo developers working on their own projects. And with better algorithms we might be able to do GPT performance on regular home hardware in the near future. The genie is out of the bottle!
This is the best, most balanced and most insightful conversation I have seen on AI. Thank you to everyone who made this wonderful show possible.
Lecun is like a small child with fingers plugged into the ears, shouting "lalalala can't hear you! He discredits Tristan Harris, as if his examples or cited experiments are flat out lies. His responses are weak and shortsighted. Sadly, Lecun is the EXACT reason of why I am terrified for the future. Hubris, bias and blatant disregard is what I expect from someone in his position (Meta). If AI alignment is left to the ones who own and fund its development and the race to the bottom continues? There will be no more second chances. Those who point to our past as a future predictor in what we are facing today with exponential growth either does NOT understand or does NOT WANT to understand. We would all love of the bright and shiny optimism that is being promised. My belief is that it's crucial to question who is promising it and why. I put my trust in those who are working towards alignment over corporations and shareholders. It's my understanding that those who are working on the alignment path are far outnumbered by those who are working on pumping it out as quickly as possible. The days of "move fast and break things" mentality needs to end yesterday. Ask Eliezer Yudkowski. Max Tegmark. Nick Bostrom. Mo Gawdat. Daniel Schmactenberger. Connor Leahy. Geoffrey Hinton, to name a few. and of course, Tristan Harris. Check out their perspectives and their wealth of knowledge and experience here. They will all say that the shiny world that we want is indeed possible. They will all agree that the version that Lecun predicts is absolutely false and very likely to be our downfall.
With. ultimate respect to Yann LeCun, his responses to Tristan Harris' points, are good examples of why a specialist scientist should avoid also being a philosopher or an intellectual if that's not their strong suit.
30 years from now I will be 70 years old. The world I currently live in will be unrecognizable both in technology and the way humans interact. What a time to be alive... -M
It’s amazing that this was only posted 3 hours ago and some it is already obsolete.
This was more exciting and insightful than any 2 hour movie I could have watched. Thank you for sharing such wonderful content
Llama2 “figure out what the hell i was” that one was actually the best answer 😂
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Can we just take a second to acknowledge how fortunate we are to get to watch such content - for free? Thanks Brian.
This conversation is so precious, it's rare that we can get quality ones like that with different voices that have their chance to express their views with clarity. For me there's a lot of ambiguity about what's the right thing to do in all this in terms of regulations, slowing, open-sourcing, etc. But one IS for sure, conversations like this are definitely very helpful. Thank you WSF and hope to see more like it in the near future!
It's too late to un-open-source AI. We already have it. Anyone who can turn maths into code can build their own LLM. And that's a lot of people. It's impossible to regulate solo developers working on their own projects. And with better algorithms we might be able to do GPT performance on regular home hardware in the near future. The genie is out of the bottle!
This is the best, most balanced and most insightful conversation I have seen on AI. Thank you to everyone who made this wonderful show possible.
Lecun is like a small child with fingers plugged into the ears, shouting "lalalala can't hear you! He discredits Tristan Harris, as if his examples or cited experiments are flat out lies. His responses are weak and shortsighted. Sadly, Lecun is the EXACT reason of why I am terrified for the future. Hubris, bias and blatant disregard is what I expect from someone in his position (Meta). If AI alignment is left to the ones who own and fund its development and the race to the bottom continues? There will be no more second chances. Those who point to our past as a future predictor in what we are facing today with exponential growth either does NOT understand or does NOT WANT to understand. We would all love of the bright and shiny optimism that is being promised. My belief is that it's crucial to question who is promising it and why. I put my trust in those who are working towards alignment over corporations and shareholders. It's my understanding that those who are working on the alignment path are far outnumbered by those who are working on pumping it out as quickly as possible. The days of "move fast and break things" mentality needs to end yesterday. Ask Eliezer Yudkowski. Max Tegmark. Nick Bostrom. Mo Gawdat. Daniel Schmactenberger. Connor Leahy. Geoffrey Hinton, to name a few. and of course, Tristan Harris. Check out their perspectives and their wealth of knowledge and experience here. They will all say that the shiny world that we want is indeed possible. They will all agree that the version that Lecun predicts is absolutely false and very likely to be our downfall.
With. ultimate respect to Yann LeCun, his responses to Tristan Harris' points, are good examples of why a specialist scientist should avoid also being a philosopher or an intellectual if that's not their strong suit.
30 years from now I will be 70 years old. The world I currently live in will be unrecognizable both in technology and the way humans interact. What a time to be alive... -M
It’s amazing that this was only posted 3 hours ago and some it is already obsolete.
This was more exciting and insightful than any 2 hour movie I could have watched. Thank you for sharing such wonderful content
Llama2 “figure out what the hell i was” that one was actually the best answer 😂