NEW Self-Improving Memory For AI (Forget Memory.md)
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Missing Scientist Found Dead in Chilling Forest Discovery
Law&Crime Network
132.7k views
This 100% self-improving AI Agent is insane… just watch
David Ondrej
34.5k views
AI Discovers Anomalies in Hubble Images We Never Knew Existed
Anton Petrov
45.9k views
Trump FORCES Discovery ON HIMSELF by DOJ FATAL ERROR
MeidasTouch
20.9k views
Self Improving AI is getting wild
Wes Roth
49.6k views
Trump AG has NO IMMUNITY after SETTING TRAP for HERSELF
MeidasTouch
893.9k views
IHIP News: JD Vance HUMILIATES Himself COVERING for Trump in DISASTER Presser!
I've Had It
408.7k views
Trump sets DISASTER TRAP for HIMSELF
MeidasTouch
177.6k views
Florida Dad Murders Wife After Discovering Her Hidden Secret
Law&Crime Network
3.8m views
New Evidence for Giant Impact 12800 Years Ago? Let's Discuss
Anton Petrov
265.2k views
Top Comments (10)
23:00 This idea used in graph memory actually applies to lots of social systems. It is a self-organizing system wherein the organization achieves an objective. It is local configuration for an ideal global state. In nature, this same principle is found in swarm intelligence. One can model understanding of various perspectives through the same structure. The objective is to reach agreement despite each viewpoint being different. The principle: local exploration to find the optimal configuration that leads to the ideal global state. Local chaos to reach global order, the order being defined by the objective.
We love science. And we love your illustrations, too. That’s why we’re here. Thank you so much for your amazing work!
Instant subscribe because you are talking in the video and not using ai. Authentic
This is a fantastic video introduction to a fascinating paper!
@5:20 I don’t understand how a mistake by the reader calls for an adjustment to the writer. Is it a given that in any possible circumstance, the problem is in the writer, and not in the reader, or any other object that might influence the outcome? How so?
What is the point if the training data are plagued with ambivalent data?
Someone is finally starting to frame what is going on with our agents in a tractable way. Now if only we could do something about the latency issues in the reasoning loop between the database and the decoder model.
Agent responses that earn high ratings for relevance, accuracy, and completeness could be given IPFS CIDs, and retrieved in the future for similar queries in an open, decentralized global platform for collective terrestrial intelligence, CTI.
0:45 love those graphics!
Without epistemic provenance, which the internet-based training data does not typically provide, the models will likely not know what is true from what is false, and while memory may become dynamic, which is better than static, it does not solve the actual problem that we face... the models do not know truth from fiction, and so they cannot be relied on to make the right choices in edge cases... and it is those cases according to the 80/20 rule that form the core of the problem we started with anyway. So while this is a step forward, I'm not seeing it as a complete solution. But one step forward is better than none, so good good. Keep going. There's a mountain ahead.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
23:00 This idea used in graph memory actually applies to lots of social systems. It is a self-organizing system wherein the organization achieves an objective. It is local configuration for an ideal global state. In nature, this same principle is found in swarm intelligence. One can model understanding of various perspectives through the same structure. The objective is to reach agreement despite each viewpoint being different. The principle: local exploration to find the optimal configuration that leads to the ideal global state. Local chaos to reach global order, the order being defined by the objective.
We love science. And we love your illustrations, too. That’s why we’re here. Thank you so much for your amazing work!
Instant subscribe because you are talking in the video and not using ai. Authentic
This is a fantastic video introduction to a fascinating paper!
@5:20 I don’t understand how a mistake by the reader calls for an adjustment to the writer. Is it a given that in any possible circumstance, the problem is in the writer, and not in the reader, or any other object that might influence the outcome? How so?
What is the point if the training data are plagued with ambivalent data?
Someone is finally starting to frame what is going on with our agents in a tractable way. Now if only we could do something about the latency issues in the reasoning loop between the database and the decoder model.
Agent responses that earn high ratings for relevance, accuracy, and completeness could be given IPFS CIDs, and retrieved in the future for similar queries in an open, decentralized global platform for collective terrestrial intelligence, CTI.
0:45 love those graphics!
Without epistemic provenance, which the internet-based training data does not typically provide, the models will likely not know what is true from what is false, and while memory may become dynamic, which is better than static, it does not solve the actual problem that we face... the models do not know truth from fiction, and so they cannot be relied on to make the right choices in edge cases... and it is those cases according to the 80/20 rule that form the core of the problem we started with anyway. So while this is a step forward, I'm not seeing it as a complete solution. But one step forward is better than none, so good good. Keep going. There's a mountain ahead.