NEW DATA on BOMBSHELL CLAIM that Trump stole election from Kamala
Related videos
Will the Epstein files BRING DOWN Trump?
David Pakman Show
78.1k views
TRUMP IS ON TOP OF THE GAME
David Pakman Show
42.6k views
SHOCK claim: Trump had a STROKE
David Pakman Show
190.3k views
They want someone to blame other than Trump
David Pakman Show
29.1k views
Trump won't find the votes this time
David Pakman Show
12.3k views
Trump derails on Fox News, hosts can’t believe it
David Pakman Show
123.1k views
Trump economy COLLAPSES, INFLATION SOARS
David Pakman Show
42.5k views
Trump's WORST NIGHTMARE
David Pakman Show
40.2k views
Trump DEAD A$$ ASLEEP
David Pakman Show
50.2k views
Trump BOMBS in EASIEST INTERVIEW ever
David Pakman Show
28.8k views
Analyzing 2024 Election Red Flags: Statistical Anomalies vs. Direct Evidence
Determine how statistical patterns identified by the Election Truth Alliance map to direct, on-the-ground evidence of manipulation regarding the 2024 election results.
Short Summary
- Host David Pakman presents his skeptical analysis, arguing Republicans performed strongly overall, potentially explaining statistical anomalies.
- ETA highlights statistical patterns correlated with known election manipulation symptoms seen globally, specifically regarding turnout and vote share percentages.
- The discussion pivots from preliminary statistical 'smoke' to direct investigation findings, including anomalous voter registration activity in Florida.
- Readers gain insight into interpreting complex statistical findings (e.g., scatter plots) versus tangible evidence gathering techniques (e.g., door knocking).
This session reviews Nathan Taylor's follow-up data on the 2024 election, contrasting statistical red flags with alternative explanations like demographic variance, before moving to on-the-ground investigative results in key areas.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Will the Epstein files BRING DOWN Trump?
David Pakman Show
78.1k views
TRUMP IS ON TOP OF THE GAME
David Pakman Show
42.6k views
SHOCK claim: Trump had a STROKE
David Pakman Show
190.3k views
They want someone to blame other than Trump
David Pakman Show
29.1k views
Trump won't find the votes this time
David Pakman Show
12.3k views
Trump derails on Fox News, hosts can’t believe it
David Pakman Show
123.1k views
Trump economy COLLAPSES, INFLATION SOARS
David Pakman Show
42.5k views
Trump's WORST NIGHTMARE
David Pakman Show
40.2k views
Trump DEAD A$$ ASLEEP
David Pakman Show
50.2k views
Trump BOMBS in EASIEST INTERVIEW ever
David Pakman Show
28.8k views
Top Comments (10)
Elon said if not for him trump would not have won . I believe him .
Nathan Taylor quit his job to do this unpaid for the past year. He is a hero.
I don't know why the Democrats didn't demand a recount. That was a big mistake.
he wasn't shot, he didn't win.
I'm a retired math teacher who has taken a lot of statistics. The most important clue that I think people are missing is that a candidate's percentage should not rise or fall linearly depending on precinct turnout. Most voters don't change their vote because the polling place is crowded or fairly empty, for instance. Turnout percentage and candidate vote percentage should be a flattish scatterplot. It should neither rise or fall appreciably as you scan the graph from low turnout to high turnout precincts. The slope of the line should be zero or close to zero. The fact that Trump's percentages tend to go up with higher turnout in thousands of precincts in many states shows something strange is going on. The fact that there was a "de-minimus" software update (with no subsequent testing) before the election makes me think a backdoor could have been inserted in the tabulating software to cause addition of votes as turnout rises. Some counties in Florida had significantly more voting voters than registered voters! Much nore investigation is needed, but I think the evidence of irregularity is there.
I've found that whenever Trump accuses others of doing something, he has either done or is planning on doing that action.
I love this guy, he didn’t have to, but he didn’t give up and continues to scrutinize these election results to learn something looking at patterns….Nathan has a Beautiful mind and is a great Patriot! TY!
I would like to hear more from Nathan. Having free and fair elections is so important. Nathan is out here doing the work!
We NEED to keep talking about this! The evidence is overwhelming and nobody is fucking saying shit! "Every accusation is an admission." We've seen it time and time again where Trump and the rest of the Republican Party will make unfounded accusations about their opposition and go on to do exactly that later on. If Trump says "Democrats stole the election", what does that imply he was planning to do?
I totally agree with Nathan. I hope he continues, because the election was called by Trump before all of the voting was counted.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Elon said if not for him trump would not have won . I believe him .
Nathan Taylor quit his job to do this unpaid for the past year. He is a hero.
I don't know why the Democrats didn't demand a recount. That was a big mistake.
he wasn't shot, he didn't win.
I'm a retired math teacher who has taken a lot of statistics. The most important clue that I think people are missing is that a candidate's percentage should not rise or fall linearly depending on precinct turnout. Most voters don't change their vote because the polling place is crowded or fairly empty, for instance. Turnout percentage and candidate vote percentage should be a flattish scatterplot. It should neither rise or fall appreciably as you scan the graph from low turnout to high turnout precincts. The slope of the line should be zero or close to zero. The fact that Trump's percentages tend to go up with higher turnout in thousands of precincts in many states shows something strange is going on. The fact that there was a "de-minimus" software update (with no subsequent testing) before the election makes me think a backdoor could have been inserted in the tabulating software to cause addition of votes as turnout rises. Some counties in Florida had significantly more voting voters than registered voters! Much nore investigation is needed, but I think the evidence of irregularity is there.
I've found that whenever Trump accuses others of doing something, he has either done or is planning on doing that action.
I love this guy, he didn’t have to, but he didn’t give up and continues to scrutinize these election results to learn something looking at patterns….Nathan has a Beautiful mind and is a great Patriot! TY!
I would like to hear more from Nathan. Having free and fair elections is so important. Nathan is out here doing the work!
We NEED to keep talking about this! The evidence is overwhelming and nobody is fucking saying shit! "Every accusation is an admission." We've seen it time and time again where Trump and the rest of the Republican Party will make unfounded accusations about their opposition and go on to do exactly that later on. If Trump says "Democrats stole the election", what does that imply he was planning to do?
I totally agree with Nathan. I hope he continues, because the election was called by Trump before all of the voting was counted.