LIVE | UT v. Kouri Richins -- Richins Motion for New Trial... This is a choice.
Transcript and Summary Unavailable
The transcript for this video is currently unavailable. Likely due to restrictions set by the content owner.
Related videos
LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Read Motion to Compel Hearing
Emily D. Baker
103.3k views
LIVE | Alex Murdaugh Motion & Order. Kouri Richins Lawyers' leave? TikTok Psychic Order.
Emily D. Baker
70.8k views
LIVE | SC v. Alex Murdaugh. New Trial. Here we go again.
Emily D. Baker
121.2k views
LIVE | Kouri Richins Sentencing Memo. So much new info. It's time for prison.
Emily D. Baker
165.0k views
LIVE | Kouri Richins wants a Continuance? Judge M ruling.
Emily D. Baker
64.4k views
LIVE | Kouri Richins Legal Troubles Grow. Slayer Statute, Sanctions, New Lawyer?
Emily D. Baker
116.4k views
Exclusive Interview | Todd Gabler Inside the Courtroom & Investigation of the Kouri Richins Trial
Emily D. Baker
107.6k views
VERDICT -- UT v. Kouri Richins - Trial Day 15
Emily D. Baker
286.2k views
UT v. Kouri Richins - Trial Day 14 - Jury Instruction Conference - Not done fighting yet it seems.
Emily D. Baker
188.2k views
LIVE TRIAL | UT v. Kouri Richins - Trial Day 8 - Insurance, Estates and the Paramore testifies!
Emily D. Baker
216.7k views
Top Comments (10)
I think the defense mistook Bloodworth’s patience and even temper as weakness, and drastically miscalculated what a skilled opponent he was. So when he knew the facts better than they did, and knew the rules of evidence better than they did, and made better/defended against objections better they saw that as unfair. How unfair that the prosecution’s strategy worked better. How unfair that the prosecution’s arguments were more persuasive to the judge. How unfair that they got interrupted or (GENTLY) admonished by the judge for misstating evidence or misinterpreting his rulings. How unfair that Bloodworth was more accurate and precise, and as such did not receive similar admonishments. The facts were against them, sure. But also, they were out-lawyered. Plain and simple.
I really hope Bloodworth goes through the trial and shows all the times the judge ruled in the defenses side.
The judge sided with the defense so often, I was surprised when he sided with the prosecution!
We all thought the judge was being overly cautious but reading through that, perhaps he was 2 steps ahead, pretty much as always
Defense is embarrassed by how badly they were out lawyered.
"Never was the state told to focus" is giving "why arent you yelling at everyone even though we are the only ones who are a problem" energy.
Nester seems confused on the rules of law. Rewatching was just a confirmation of what I thought about the defense during trial. On the flip side Bloodworth is top notch. Love him!
(When the judge reads this) "Can you please be precise"
The judge said "Don't do that stay focused" because Lewis was going at Bloodworth.
This was possibly the most even-keeled, fair and patient Judge that I think I have ever seen, after watching 20+ trials end-to-end...
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
I think the defense mistook Bloodworth’s patience and even temper as weakness, and drastically miscalculated what a skilled opponent he was. So when he knew the facts better than they did, and knew the rules of evidence better than they did, and made better/defended against objections better they saw that as unfair. How unfair that the prosecution’s strategy worked better. How unfair that the prosecution’s arguments were more persuasive to the judge. How unfair that they got interrupted or (GENTLY) admonished by the judge for misstating evidence or misinterpreting his rulings. How unfair that Bloodworth was more accurate and precise, and as such did not receive similar admonishments. The facts were against them, sure. But also, they were out-lawyered. Plain and simple.
I really hope Bloodworth goes through the trial and shows all the times the judge ruled in the defenses side.
The judge sided with the defense so often, I was surprised when he sided with the prosecution!
We all thought the judge was being overly cautious but reading through that, perhaps he was 2 steps ahead, pretty much as always
Defense is embarrassed by how badly they were out lawyered.
"Never was the state told to focus" is giving "why arent you yelling at everyone even though we are the only ones who are a problem" energy.
Nester seems confused on the rules of law. Rewatching was just a confirmation of what I thought about the defense during trial. On the flip side Bloodworth is top notch. Love him!
(When the judge reads this) "Can you please be precise"
The judge said "Don't do that stay focused" because Lewis was going at Bloodworth.
This was possibly the most even-keeled, fair and patient Judge that I think I have ever seen, after watching 20+ trials end-to-end...