Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
How AI agents & Claude skills work (Clearly Explained)
Greg Isenberg
599.6k views
Tamara de Lempicka: Tamara in the Green Bugatti: Great Art Explained
Great Art Explained
11.7k views
Context Engineering for AI Agents with LangChain and Manus
LangChain
67.0k views
Egon Schiele: Great Art Explained
Great Art Explained
161.1k views
How to apply context engineering
LangChain
58.0k views
Context Engineering for Agents
LangChain
189.5k views
Andrew Ng: State of AI Agents | LangChain Interrupt
LangChain
244.2k views
Digital Euro Explained: Control, Surveillance & the Real Agenda
Coin Bureau
46.3k views
AI Agents, Clearly Explained
Jeff Su
3.1m views
Fully local multi-agent systems with LangGraph
LangChain
71.2k views
Top Comments (7)
Thank you everyone for leading the way. There is SO MUCH WORK LEFT TO DO IN HARNESS DEVELOPMENT.
Thanks folks for everything you build , Thanks Sydney Runkle for so many meaningful insight and product
You could use ai to delete the interviewer's "that makes sense" of some variatian.
Theres so many options with langchain, langgraph, deep agents, id like to know how a business case can be accomplished by selecting the right option, ie if i need to assist with resume screening, pick the best candidate for a job spec - where do I begin? Langgraph can provide a orchestrator pattern which is synonymous with swarm, but do i use langgraph or deep agents ? It's not clear what would be the optimal solution from a build pov imo. Some guidance would be highly appreciated
Replacing deterministic workflows is the wrong frame. We need hybrid systems where deterministic scaffolding handles reliability and agents handle ambiguity.
Sandboxes plus sub-agent delegation. Just microservices with extra steps. Prove me wrong.
I can now see why Harrison chose you. 🫡 Great to have you Sydney! 🤗 Jake, you're awesome! 🤜🤛
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (7)
Thank you everyone for leading the way. There is SO MUCH WORK LEFT TO DO IN HARNESS DEVELOPMENT.
Thanks folks for everything you build , Thanks Sydney Runkle for so many meaningful insight and product
You could use ai to delete the interviewer's "that makes sense" of some variatian.
Theres so many options with langchain, langgraph, deep agents, id like to know how a business case can be accomplished by selecting the right option, ie if i need to assist with resume screening, pick the best candidate for a job spec - where do I begin? Langgraph can provide a orchestrator pattern which is synonymous with swarm, but do i use langgraph or deep agents ? It's not clear what would be the optimal solution from a build pov imo. Some guidance would be highly appreciated
Replacing deterministic workflows is the wrong frame. We need hybrid systems where deterministic scaffolding handles reliability and agents handle ambiguity.
Sandboxes plus sub-agent delegation. Just microservices with extra steps. Prove me wrong.
I can now see why Harrison chose you. 🫡 Great to have you Sydney! 🤗 Jake, you're awesome! 🤜🤛