It’s MAHA TIME: Trump Picks RFK Jr.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Let Trump COOK
Ben Shapiro
199.5k views
My Top 8 Trump Moments
Ben Shapiro
48.8k views
SHOWDOWN: Trump vs. Powell
Ben Shapiro
473.5k views
Trump’s Saudi TRIUMPH
Ben Shapiro
154.3k views
How Trump’s Pope Meme Broke the Media
Ben Shapiro
43.7k views
Trump's Plan For Ukraine Is Clear
Ben Shapiro
104.5k views
More Trump WINS: Joy Reid GONE!
Ben Shapiro
340.2k views
The Trump-Musk Show ROLLS ON
Ben Shapiro
232.7k views
Trump Goes FULL FAFO!
Ben Shapiro
496.2k views
Trump WRECKS Davos!
Ben Shapiro
311.5k views
Top Comments (10)
I am from SoCal and I know a lot of democrats who voted for Trump because of RFK. This is something everybody should agree with. Get the BS out of our food.
I don't understand why people think a man who thinks he is a woman is better as secretary of health then a man who knows he is a man
As someone studying IN the medical/nutrition field, nothing convinces me more about the need for RFK Jr than hearing “experts” say he’s a bad idea
AOC removing pronouns from bio is lowkey a VERY significant, positive sign.
Fetterman's stroke fixed his brain.
as a european I can tell you that this is the right move for you guys
The Kennedy legacy lives on.
I'm a doctor who is super interested in nutrition and preventative health. I'm very excited that RFK is finally bringing this dialogue about food and health to the forefront of the conversation. This is so important and our unhealthy lifestyles are largely contributing to our worse outcomes compared to other developed nations. My only concern with RFKs dialogue thus far is I think he is misdirected in what "high yield" targets are for our health. While it's true that certain chemicals may be contributing to adverse health outcomes, the extent of their contribution is largely unknown and unstudied. While I am all for more data further elucidating this additives, there is already a super high yield target that I feel he is addressing inadequately: obesity. We know that obesity increases multimorbitity to a drastic extent. And obesity first and foremost is due to an excess of calories. Targeting the hypercaloric, hyperpalatable food that is easily excessible, encourging adjustments in our food that lower calories, and promoting a culture that emphasizes a more balanced diet with lower calorie, filling, voluminous food should be our top priority.
Columbia U. Dr. of Nutrition here. (Professor at Pace U. and a conservative.) Really happy that we're looking at nutrition. The evidence needs to be teased out and better explained to the public.
No fluoride in our drinking water ….. no seed oils in our foods … that’s a hell of a start
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
I am from SoCal and I know a lot of democrats who voted for Trump because of RFK. This is something everybody should agree with. Get the BS out of our food.
I don't understand why people think a man who thinks he is a woman is better as secretary of health then a man who knows he is a man
As someone studying IN the medical/nutrition field, nothing convinces me more about the need for RFK Jr than hearing “experts” say he’s a bad idea
AOC removing pronouns from bio is lowkey a VERY significant, positive sign.
Fetterman's stroke fixed his brain.
as a european I can tell you that this is the right move for you guys
The Kennedy legacy lives on.
I'm a doctor who is super interested in nutrition and preventative health. I'm very excited that RFK is finally bringing this dialogue about food and health to the forefront of the conversation. This is so important and our unhealthy lifestyles are largely contributing to our worse outcomes compared to other developed nations. My only concern with RFKs dialogue thus far is I think he is misdirected in what "high yield" targets are for our health. While it's true that certain chemicals may be contributing to adverse health outcomes, the extent of their contribution is largely unknown and unstudied. While I am all for more data further elucidating this additives, there is already a super high yield target that I feel he is addressing inadequately: obesity. We know that obesity increases multimorbitity to a drastic extent. And obesity first and foremost is due to an excess of calories. Targeting the hypercaloric, hyperpalatable food that is easily excessible, encourging adjustments in our food that lower calories, and promoting a culture that emphasizes a more balanced diet with lower calorie, filling, voluminous food should be our top priority.
Columbia U. Dr. of Nutrition here. (Professor at Pace U. and a conservative.) Really happy that we're looking at nutrition. The evidence needs to be teased out and better explained to the public.
No fluoride in our drinking water ….. no seed oils in our foods … that’s a hell of a start