The Return of Silicon Valley’s Greatest Fraud
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Motorola - The Greatest Comeback of All Time
ColdFusion
160.3k views
Here’s How the Pentagon Created Silicon Valley!
The Jimmy Dore Show
65.7k views
The Worst Tech Product of the Century [Friend.com]
ColdFusion
51.7k views
The Future of Work: High-Paying Careers That AI Won't Replace
Silicon Valley Girl
200.5k views
How A Chinese Villager Shook Silicon Valley [DeepSeek Founder]
ColdFusion
708.6k views
The Rise of Vietnam
ColdFusion
912.9k views
The Race to Create the "iPhone of AI" is Heating Up!
ColdFusion
805.2k views
Driving Tesla CYBERTRUCK: The best Tesla ever? *full review
Silicon Valley Girl
157.8k views
The Fraud Chronicles feat. Coffeezilla
ColdFusion
1.1m views
The Meteoric Rise of Nvidia [Fastest Growing Stock]
ColdFusion
906.3k views
Top Comments (10)
I think if she makes her voice even deeper this time, it'll work for sure
We got Elizabeth Holmes again before GTA6
This is what happens when society tells you "fake it until you make it" and "just be confident bro"
First, they think you're crazy. Then, they fight you. Then, they indict you. Then, they find you guilty. Then, you go down in history as a disgrace.
She didn't have an invention. She had an idea. I can say "we should build a time machine"....that's an idea....but if I have no idea how to do it, it's pointless.
You know what they say: Once a psychopath, always a psychopath
_"What if it legitimately works this time?"_ Spoiler: it doesn't.
You got to admire the balls it takes to run the same scam twice
I truly despise the media agencies hyping her up like that.
In 2018 an algorithm was set up to learn the difference between benign skin spots and skin cancer. The AI seemed very accurate, until the researchers realized that if you put a ruler in the photo it would instantly flag it as cancer. Because photos of skin cancer would often have rulers for researcher purposes, the algorithm noticed the patern and reinforced it. There's an argument to be made for keeping Algorithms and AI out of healthcare until we can GUARANTE they aren't reinforcing broken human systems. What if people with certain skintones were only able to see a doctor when symptoms where severe? The machine could conclude those skintones are more cancerous and skew individual results. Just because it seems accurate, doesn't mean it is.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
I think if she makes her voice even deeper this time, it'll work for sure
We got Elizabeth Holmes again before GTA6
This is what happens when society tells you "fake it until you make it" and "just be confident bro"
First, they think you're crazy. Then, they fight you. Then, they indict you. Then, they find you guilty. Then, you go down in history as a disgrace.
She didn't have an invention. She had an idea. I can say "we should build a time machine"....that's an idea....but if I have no idea how to do it, it's pointless.
You know what they say: Once a psychopath, always a psychopath
_"What if it legitimately works this time?"_ Spoiler: it doesn't.
You got to admire the balls it takes to run the same scam twice
I truly despise the media agencies hyping her up like that.
In 2018 an algorithm was set up to learn the difference between benign skin spots and skin cancer. The AI seemed very accurate, until the researchers realized that if you put a ruler in the photo it would instantly flag it as cancer. Because photos of skin cancer would often have rulers for researcher purposes, the algorithm noticed the patern and reinforced it. There's an argument to be made for keeping Algorithms and AI out of healthcare until we can GUARANTE they aren't reinforcing broken human systems. What if people with certain skintones were only able to see a doctor when symptoms where severe? The machine could conclude those skintones are more cancerous and skew individual results. Just because it seems accurate, doesn't mean it is.