The Last Great Debate
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Friday the 13th
Distractible Podcast
74.7k views
Please Laugh
Distractible Podcast
166.7k views
The Oxford 3000
Distractible Podcast
234.6k views
The Cursed Episode
Distractible Podcast
218.2k views
Shame, Shame, Shame
Distractible Podcast
195.6k views
Let's Get Deep
Distractible Podcast
230.1k views
What The Hell Is That?
Distractible Podcast
209.7k views
I Miss The Old Distractible
Distractible Podcast
211.3k views
We Hate These States
Distractible Podcast
264.5k views
The Perfecter Crime
Distractible Podcast
341.1k views
Top Comments (10)
Bird expert here , can confirm the creature in the tortilla is a bird.
Lol the chapstick container argument just seems so stupid to me but it's too funny. Something being in a container does not make the thing itself a container, it just means it is contained in a container. Chapstick comes in a container, but it is not inherently a container. Once the chapstick container is emptied of the chapstick, it is no longer called chapstick it's called an empty container. There's just a big difference in phrasing there. Take the milk out of its jug, the jug is no longer milk it's just an empty container. That doesn't make milk a container, it makes it contained in a container.
I love how literally all of the distractible audience agrees that Bob is crazy wrong about the chapstick thing 😂
Chapstick isn’t a container
This again... Bob, being IN a container is not the same as BEING a container.
Man, Bob is really gonna die on that "chapstick is a container" hill, isn't he?
i'm on bob's side about crunchy peanut butter but not chapstick. dude, wade literally addressed the container part of chapstick in that one 20 questions episode. i don't get what more you could want.
Bob is right about many things but chapstick is not one of them lol
fish with neck searches on google spiked after this episode
How did they get the Chapstick argument so wrong from all aspects, the way you would quantify it is if you were to add Chapstick or milk to something as a part of a recipe then would the container be a part of it, then the definitive answer would be "No". But hey I'm not a philosopher or lawyer.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Bird expert here , can confirm the creature in the tortilla is a bird.
Lol the chapstick container argument just seems so stupid to me but it's too funny. Something being in a container does not make the thing itself a container, it just means it is contained in a container. Chapstick comes in a container, but it is not inherently a container. Once the chapstick container is emptied of the chapstick, it is no longer called chapstick it's called an empty container. There's just a big difference in phrasing there. Take the milk out of its jug, the jug is no longer milk it's just an empty container. That doesn't make milk a container, it makes it contained in a container.
I love how literally all of the distractible audience agrees that Bob is crazy wrong about the chapstick thing 😂
Chapstick isn’t a container
This again... Bob, being IN a container is not the same as BEING a container.
Man, Bob is really gonna die on that "chapstick is a container" hill, isn't he?
i'm on bob's side about crunchy peanut butter but not chapstick. dude, wade literally addressed the container part of chapstick in that one 20 questions episode. i don't get what more you could want.
Bob is right about many things but chapstick is not one of them lol
fish with neck searches on google spiked after this episode
How did they get the Chapstick argument so wrong from all aspects, the way you would quantify it is if you were to add Chapstick or milk to something as a part of a recipe then would the container be a part of it, then the definitive answer would be "No". But hey I'm not a philosopher or lawyer.