MIT Professor: One Skill That Protects Your Career in the age of AI | Max Tegmark
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Godfather of AI: The next 5 years Will Change Humanity Forever | Yoshua Bengio
Silicon Valley Girl
62.1k views
I Tested 100+ AI Tools, These 11 Will Make you Rich in 2026
Silicon Valley Girl
119.5k views
Future of Work 2026: The Only Jobs That Will Survive the AI Era
Silicon Valley Girl
169.8k views
CEO of Microsoft AI:The Next 10 Years Will Change Humanity Forever
Silicon Valley Girl
219.7k views
$20B AI CEO: The ONLY trait for success in the AI era | Aravind Srinivas, Co-founder of Perplexity
Silicon Valley Girl
535.8k views
$1.5B AI Founder: This Is Your Golden Age to Build With AI
Silicon Valley Girl
66.3k views
9 AI Skills That Will Make You Rich in 2026
Silicon Valley Girl
136.1k views
AI Agents EXPLAINED in 14 minutes and TOOLS for building one
Silicon Valley Girl
37.2k views
The Future of Work: High-Paying Careers That AI Won't Replace
Silicon Valley Girl
200.5k views
Donβt Let AI Take Your Job: Master These 7 Skills Now
Silicon Valley Girl
41.1k views
Top Comments (10)
Iβd like to see a study on the effect of cognitive offloading on those who have no inside voice vs strong inner dialogue. it got me thinking that this could be an issue when the Silicon Valley girl said, βpause for 30 seconds before you prompt and think of the outcome that you want.β π€
We aren't building something smarter than us. We are amassing knowledge in databases that can recall things almost instantly with a natural language promt. That's not intelligence. It's not thinking. It's instant access to answers and even shortcuts to things we should learn ourselves. But it's not intelligence. You can use it to learn just like a library, but you can't copy and paste stuff from the library for your thesis paper. That's what we're doing. We need to start using it ethically and doing our own work.
I learned this early on and have had to take counter measures to make sure I'm still learning and not off loading too much cognitive function
Speed and efficiency and volume are not always the best choice
Using LLMs is the crack version of copying your shoolwork and homework instead of doing it yourself
AI is extremely powerful and revolutionary. It will continue to have dramatic impacts in our efficiency and productivity. However to say that it will "start thinking for us" is a grave hyperbole or even fantasy. For all it's contributions, AI has generated few (if any) *original ideas or thoughts* . It is trained on human work products, aspirations and goals. Let's not sell human intellectual capital so short.
4:19 actually, the Turing Test is likely a Red Herring for deciding if AGI has been reached. Language is only a small subset of human experience/capabilities. For example, passing the Turing Test is not proof that LLMs can reason.
the Turing Trap, imitation games, replicate human work, replace
Good word
I notice using the prewritten words during texting affected my spelling. I went back to slow mode, spelling myself every word with restoration to spelling. In school I noticed reading greatly improved my spelling
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan β’ All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Iβd like to see a study on the effect of cognitive offloading on those who have no inside voice vs strong inner dialogue. it got me thinking that this could be an issue when the Silicon Valley girl said, βpause for 30 seconds before you prompt and think of the outcome that you want.β π€
We aren't building something smarter than us. We are amassing knowledge in databases that can recall things almost instantly with a natural language promt. That's not intelligence. It's not thinking. It's instant access to answers and even shortcuts to things we should learn ourselves. But it's not intelligence. You can use it to learn just like a library, but you can't copy and paste stuff from the library for your thesis paper. That's what we're doing. We need to start using it ethically and doing our own work.
I learned this early on and have had to take counter measures to make sure I'm still learning and not off loading too much cognitive function
Speed and efficiency and volume are not always the best choice
Using LLMs is the crack version of copying your shoolwork and homework instead of doing it yourself
AI is extremely powerful and revolutionary. It will continue to have dramatic impacts in our efficiency and productivity. However to say that it will "start thinking for us" is a grave hyperbole or even fantasy. For all it's contributions, AI has generated few (if any) *original ideas or thoughts* . It is trained on human work products, aspirations and goals. Let's not sell human intellectual capital so short.
4:19 actually, the Turing Test is likely a Red Herring for deciding if AGI has been reached. Language is only a small subset of human experience/capabilities. For example, passing the Turing Test is not proof that LLMs can reason.
the Turing Trap, imitation games, replicate human work, replace
Good word
I notice using the prewritten words during texting affected my spelling. I went back to slow mode, spelling myself every word with restoration to spelling. In school I noticed reading greatly improved my spelling