My First Winning Agentic AI Trading Strategy On Polymarket
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
’98% WIN RATE’: White House Makes $2.9 MILLION Betting On Trump’s Wars On Polymarket | Kyle Kulinski
Secular Talk
47.8k views
Bill Ackman: Investment Strategy, What the Market is Missing, How AI Breaks Businesses
All-In Podcast
59.7k views
BITCOIN: IT IS REPEATING!!!!! (My strategy 2026)
Ivan on Tech
19.4k views
Elon’s Anthropic Deal, The Next AI Monopoly?, “FDA for AI” Panic, Trading the AI Boom
All-In Podcast
107.8k views
Politicians CAUGHT Trading THEMSELVES On Prediction Market
Breaking Points
88.0k views
OpenAI's Identity Crisis, Datacenter Wars, Market Up on Iran News, Mamdani's First Tax, Swalwell Out
All-In Podcast
157.8k views
Maxx Crosby’s frustration about trade, Venezuela wins WBC, Should the Broncos be favorites? | FTF
First Things First
133.9k views
Polymarket REFUSES To Pay Out Over "Invasion" Of Venezuela, Insider Trading ALLEGED | Tim Pool
Timcast
29.7k views
Fundstrat’s Mark Newton: Will the S&P 500 Hit 7,000 or Correct First?
Fundstrat
62.4k views
How to Get Rich (without luck, talent, or a trust fund)
My First Million
274.4k views
Top Comments (5)
be careful with adverse selection (specially if you do market making), backtesting market making will always be unrealistic, also verify that your polymarket data is tick by tick and has book depth. Fair value strategy will fire many signals when there is market manipulation
Objective Conclusion: 1. The idea presented in the video is theoretically sound. Buying at a discount to fair value via a maker bid may have positive expected value (EV). 2. However, our current implementation/edge model has not demonstrated this. The NO signals, in particular, are poor. 3. The video hasn’t proven profitability. It lacks a public fill log, an adverse-selection report, and a full trade history. Based on our data, the claim that “this is a profitable bot” hasn’t been confirmed yet. 4. It cannot be deployed live. It’s too early, even with a small capital. 5. We can only continue this as a research project. The next reasonable test: disable NO, tighten the filter for YES, and continue paper trading for another 24–48 hours. If YES doesn’t at least reach a stable profit over 50–100 fills, we should either abandon the idea or completely overhaul the model. In short: the method isn’t a bad idea, but right now it isn’t working. The “info-gypsy” risk associated with the strategy is high.
What about the gtc giveaway
Are you gonna start paying the $150 Chainlink asks from first of July?
great video! getting a bunch of (good) historical data is a pain in the butt!
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (5)
be careful with adverse selection (specially if you do market making), backtesting market making will always be unrealistic, also verify that your polymarket data is tick by tick and has book depth. Fair value strategy will fire many signals when there is market manipulation
Objective Conclusion: 1. The idea presented in the video is theoretically sound. Buying at a discount to fair value via a maker bid may have positive expected value (EV). 2. However, our current implementation/edge model has not demonstrated this. The NO signals, in particular, are poor. 3. The video hasn’t proven profitability. It lacks a public fill log, an adverse-selection report, and a full trade history. Based on our data, the claim that “this is a profitable bot” hasn’t been confirmed yet. 4. It cannot be deployed live. It’s too early, even with a small capital. 5. We can only continue this as a research project. The next reasonable test: disable NO, tighten the filter for YES, and continue paper trading for another 24–48 hours. If YES doesn’t at least reach a stable profit over 50–100 fills, we should either abandon the idea or completely overhaul the model. In short: the method isn’t a bad idea, but right now it isn’t working. The “info-gypsy” risk associated with the strategy is high.
What about the gtc giveaway
Are you gonna start paying the $150 Chainlink asks from first of July?
great video! getting a bunch of (good) historical data is a pain in the butt!