Why Qualia Seem Real | Michael Tooley
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Roger Penrose on the Deep Nature of Reality | Closer To Truth Chats
Closer To Truth
88.8k views
Fred Alan Wolf - Does Physical Reality Go Beyond?
Closer To Truth
32.2k views
Michio Kaku on Quantum Supremacy | Closer To Truth Chats
Closer To Truth
179.2k views
Max Tegmark - What is Ultimate Reality?
Closer To Truth
48.0k views
The Multiverse: What's Real? | ENCORE Episode 1801 | Closer To Truth
Closer To Truth
39.0k views
J. Richard Gott - Why Did Our Universe Begin?
Closer To Truth
180.8k views
Lee Smolin - What Do Black Holes and Dark Matter Reveal?
Closer To Truth
65.6k views
Why is Consciousness So Mysterious? | Episode 103 | Closer To Truth
Closer To Truth
75.0k views
Carlo Rovelli - What Exists?
Closer To Truth
63.9k views
Nima Arkani-Hamed - Why is Quantum Gravity So Significant?
Closer To Truth
47.7k views
Top Comments (10)
This debate around qualia really hits the mark—it's the 'great divide' for a reason. I loved how the Mary argument was brought up; it’s a classic, but still challenges materialism in such a clear way. I’ve been digging into the intersection of philosophy and science on my own channel lately, and seeing this breakdown is honestly validating. It’s a tough road to explore these deep topics without much support, but videos like this keep me motivated to keep digging deeper. Really thought-provoking.
Very good
Interesting question. 👍
The question is really why do qualia seem unreal according to Jerry Fodor
non materialistic views always lead to concepts that can’t be proven and you just have accepted them if you resonate with them but a materialistic approach would be to replicate qualia in a non biological machine or identity the mechanism that leads to qualia. this cannot be excluded as impossible. since in the process of the evolution it seems qualia may have appeared at some point then it seems likely it requires a certain configuration but it could be also fundamental. but it is hard to imagine an electron having qualia. what it does it bounces, travels as waves and can transform into photons (e- β+annihilation). what kind of qualia is that? the brain at least can create a virtual environment. qualia outside matter is even more weird: because you get virtually the same virtual environment as if using eyes with lens, focus, field of view, even time passing. really ?
*Michael Tooley argues that conscious experience cannot be easily reduced to physical descriptions and remains persuaded that qualia are real.* Can consciousness be fully explained by physical processes—or is something essential left out?
Can they not come up with a better term than “qualia.” That’s not a word associated with any common vernacular.
No one knows what qualia is like. They cannot explain their own qualia, much less anyone else's.
Uh...
You're alive. Can you explain that? No, let's ignore that and replace it with consciousness and qualia.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
This debate around qualia really hits the mark—it's the 'great divide' for a reason. I loved how the Mary argument was brought up; it’s a classic, but still challenges materialism in such a clear way. I’ve been digging into the intersection of philosophy and science on my own channel lately, and seeing this breakdown is honestly validating. It’s a tough road to explore these deep topics without much support, but videos like this keep me motivated to keep digging deeper. Really thought-provoking.
Very good
Interesting question. 👍
The question is really why do qualia seem unreal according to Jerry Fodor
non materialistic views always lead to concepts that can’t be proven and you just have accepted them if you resonate with them but a materialistic approach would be to replicate qualia in a non biological machine or identity the mechanism that leads to qualia. this cannot be excluded as impossible. since in the process of the evolution it seems qualia may have appeared at some point then it seems likely it requires a certain configuration but it could be also fundamental. but it is hard to imagine an electron having qualia. what it does it bounces, travels as waves and can transform into photons (e- β+annihilation). what kind of qualia is that? the brain at least can create a virtual environment. qualia outside matter is even more weird: because you get virtually the same virtual environment as if using eyes with lens, focus, field of view, even time passing. really ?
*Michael Tooley argues that conscious experience cannot be easily reduced to physical descriptions and remains persuaded that qualia are real.* Can consciousness be fully explained by physical processes—or is something essential left out?
Can they not come up with a better term than “qualia.” That’s not a word associated with any common vernacular.
No one knows what qualia is like. They cannot explain their own qualia, much less anyone else's.
Uh...
You're alive. Can you explain that? No, let's ignore that and replace it with consciousness and qualia.