How the MIND of an AI Actually works! Inside Neural Networks!
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
How does Claude Code *actually* work?
Theo - t3․gg
189.3k views
r/Askreddit What's the Dumbest Idea that Actually Worked?
rSlash
81.5k views
Inside the Mind of Jeffrey Epstein’s Publicist
Shawn Ryan Show
79.8k views
Homan Gets to Work in MN and Meets Walz, Inside the Funding of MN Activist Networks: AM Update 1/28
Megyn Kelly
63.6k views
Inside the Mind of Charlie Kirk's Alleged Assassin
Law&Crime Network
104.4k views
How Smuggling Actually Works | 14 Arrested in Oakland Airport
Matthew Cox | Inside True Crime
196.2k views
Hawking Purposely LIED about Hawking Radiation! How it REALLY Works!
Arvin Ash
91.8k views
🔴 Why The Carnivore Diet Actually Works
Anthony Chaffee MD
86.6k views
@Asianometry & Dylan Patel — How the semiconductor industry actually works
Dwarkesh Patel
329.8k views
What is DNS? (and how it makes the Internet work)
NetworkChuck
619.5k views
Top Comments (10)
The problem is, you train a neural network with a particular goal in mind, but it ends up doing more. It finds patterns in the data you were not able to foresee. When ChatGPT was trained, nobody thought it will be able to do math. Even if it's just simple arithmetic with small numbers. Nobody new it would be able to handle concepts or make generalizations. It would be more useful to think of neural networks as function finders. They substitute the function you are not able to explicitly define and write conventionally. The bad thing about training a neural network on vast amounts of information is, it ends up picking the intentions behind the words. In a way it finds the function of emotional outbursts or bad intentions. As long as the information was generated by humans with such flaws, the neural network is bound to pick those flaws up. In the case with ChatGPT and Bing Chat they had to train another neural network to block those type of responses. So in a way these unforeseen consequences are already happening. I think the issue here is that such big neural network require lots of data and it's not humanly viable to check all that data and sanitize it. Just search for *"Bing Chat Behaving Badly"* and you'll see what I'm talking about.
I recall reading about an AI program that was built to recognize wolves from a picture. They trained it with a bunch of pictures, but when they then showed it a picture of a wolf, and asked it if this was a wolf, it failed. They also showed it pictures of dogs and sometimes it would fail by saying it was a wolf. They decided to add code to determine what the AI was using to "learn" what a wolf was. They discovered that all the pictures of wolves that they used to train the AI had snow in the background and the snow is what the AI picked up on. I think we need to be very careful introducing AI into society to make sure it's not flawed in the hidden, black-box part.
I've been trying to inform myself about AI for a couple months now and I never really understood why of how people said "we don't understand how it works". Your video is the first that made me understand the black box. Great job my friend!
I've got a "well, actually ..." here for ya. AI/ML engineer here - many of these larger networks actually DO do things they have not been trained to do. They often surprise their own developers with capabilities they were never trained to perform.
You should also add a discussion on recurrent networks. Maybe neuromorphic ones too. The feed-forward networks are the most common, but these others are pretty interesting.
Here's the link to my prior video on how AI bots like ChatGPT work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAiqNav2cRE - Good background to have prior to or after watching. video above
If toe is the input then eot must be the output So my dear Ash get ready for the end of transmission by the broadcasting tenet
Thank you Arvin for this topic.
0:27 I don't know how it works, I've been wondering a lot how it does, that's why I'm watching this.
So nicely explained, thanks
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
The problem is, you train a neural network with a particular goal in mind, but it ends up doing more. It finds patterns in the data you were not able to foresee. When ChatGPT was trained, nobody thought it will be able to do math. Even if it's just simple arithmetic with small numbers. Nobody new it would be able to handle concepts or make generalizations. It would be more useful to think of neural networks as function finders. They substitute the function you are not able to explicitly define and write conventionally. The bad thing about training a neural network on vast amounts of information is, it ends up picking the intentions behind the words. In a way it finds the function of emotional outbursts or bad intentions. As long as the information was generated by humans with such flaws, the neural network is bound to pick those flaws up. In the case with ChatGPT and Bing Chat they had to train another neural network to block those type of responses. So in a way these unforeseen consequences are already happening. I think the issue here is that such big neural network require lots of data and it's not humanly viable to check all that data and sanitize it. Just search for *"Bing Chat Behaving Badly"* and you'll see what I'm talking about.
I recall reading about an AI program that was built to recognize wolves from a picture. They trained it with a bunch of pictures, but when they then showed it a picture of a wolf, and asked it if this was a wolf, it failed. They also showed it pictures of dogs and sometimes it would fail by saying it was a wolf. They decided to add code to determine what the AI was using to "learn" what a wolf was. They discovered that all the pictures of wolves that they used to train the AI had snow in the background and the snow is what the AI picked up on. I think we need to be very careful introducing AI into society to make sure it's not flawed in the hidden, black-box part.
I've been trying to inform myself about AI for a couple months now and I never really understood why of how people said "we don't understand how it works". Your video is the first that made me understand the black box. Great job my friend!
I've got a "well, actually ..." here for ya. AI/ML engineer here - many of these larger networks actually DO do things they have not been trained to do. They often surprise their own developers with capabilities they were never trained to perform.
You should also add a discussion on recurrent networks. Maybe neuromorphic ones too. The feed-forward networks are the most common, but these others are pretty interesting.
Here's the link to my prior video on how AI bots like ChatGPT work: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAiqNav2cRE - Good background to have prior to or after watching. video above
If toe is the input then eot must be the output So my dear Ash get ready for the end of transmission by the broadcasting tenet
Thank you Arvin for this topic.
0:27 I don't know how it works, I've been wondering a lot how it does, that's why I'm watching this.
So nicely explained, thanks