David Chalmers Discusses the Hard Problem of Consciousness

I started watching this channel to get away from politics. I think America is majorly devoid of informed critical thinkers. This channel is absorbing and grounding for me.

It's been so nice watching Chuck's questions and comments get more informed as this show goes on. He's learning right along with the audience, and it fosters a great sense of community.

Im sorry, but my life has been bad lately and finding this show is like getting a christmas present a little early. I love you guys and i will be watching. Thank you for your show, you are a blessing to the world and so refreshing that you are real and trustworthy!!!

Can we just take a moment to admire the courage of Chuck Nice? Week after week he sits between giants of science and maintains his cool and asks great questions and adds to the conversation. I think I'd be terrified to sit next to any of Neil's guests and pretend that I could add anything to the conversation. And the genius of NdGT to bring him in from the beginning. Fantastic all around.

Everyone else came to say it, and I want to be another one to say that I love seeing Chuck's growth in these videos. He gets more and more involved in the discussions in every video, becomes more knowledgeable, yet still maintains his humor and manages to deliver at the best times. He knows when to interject, knows when to sit back and listen, absolutely love Chuck's vibes, and I know it has to be such a joy to spend so much time with him.

Gary O’Reilly has become one of my favorite cohosts. He's reserved, doesn't always laugh at the jokes, but then comes out with something thoughtful. Any time Gary's on, I know it will be a good episode.

Chuck has become so freaking educated to hang in these conversations. Gives me hope as an ordinary human that we can all continue to become better educated. Doesn't hurt that Neil is a masterclass in how to be an educator. Regardless, Kudos to Chuck!!

This deserves a 3 hour episode tbh, I would watch entirely

When I listen to people like this, my ignorance scares me! Funnily enough though, I love it and I love thinking about the topics long after the conversations end. 🇬🇧

What I find missing in many of these conversations—whether they come from neuroscience, philosophy, or AI—is a recognition that consciousness isn’t just about having the right structures or representing the right information. It’s about the way a living system is integrated through time. Subjective experience isn’t a thing the brain “produces” at a moment; it’s the ongoing synthesis of what we retain, what we attend to now, and what we anticipate next. That temporal flow is what gives experience its depth, its continuity, and its first-person feel. Without it, no system—biological or artificial—would have a world to inhabit or a self to navigate it. This is why the “illusion” idea feels incomplete. Illusions depend on a perspective sustained over time; continuity isn’t something consciousness adds to reality, it’s part of the process by which a conscious organism makes sense of reality at all. Likewise, debates about where consciousness “arises”—sensory cortex, prefrontal cortex—miss the point that experience is a process unfolding across levels, not a property located in a single region. If we ever discover “laws of consciousness,” they may not look like physics. They may look more like principles governing how organisms weave past, present, and future into a coherent field of experience.