Navigate Select ESC Close

Trump DOJ Sues as Their ENTIRE SCHEME BACKFIRES

2025-12-25 Entertainment
40.3k
4.3k
220
Legal AF
Legal AF
1.1m subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/@LegalAFMTN?sub_confirmation=1 Brian Kabateck and Shant Karnikian discuss the DOJ's lawsuit against Illinois Governor JB Pritzker over the state's new immigration protection law signed December 9. The Illinois Bivens Act and Court Access, Safety, and Participation Act ban civil immigration arrests inside courthouses and within 1,000 feet of courthouse buildings, require hospitals, daycares, and public universities to develop response plans for federal immigration raids, prohibit sharing personal information with immigration agents, and create a private right of action allowing residents to sue federal officers individually with minimum $10,000 punitive damages. The law came after Operation Midway Blitz arrested over 4,000 people in Chicago with only 15% having criminal records. Brian analyzes the constitutional issues, predicting the courthouse ban will likely survive but questioning whether the 1,000-foot perimeter is arbitrary and the punitive damages provision is improper. Shant explains the Supremacy Clause doesn't require states to assist federal law enforcement—states don't need to open courthouses to arrests, share resident data, or help investigations. The hosts discuss the Tenth Amendment and states' rights, noting the irony of Republicans typically championing states' rights suddenly supporting federal overreach. Brian points out the DOJ forum-shopped by filing in the Southern District of Illinois rather than the more liberal Northern District in Chicago, and notes sanctuary state laws mandating non-cooperation have been largely upheld while laws actively interfering with federal operations have failed. The hosts predict this lawsuit will ironically help states by creating a judicial roadmap clarifying what protections states can enact, potentially establishing precedent limiting future federal overreach. Kabateck LLP: Call 1-844-74-CIVIL for a free case evaluation or visit us at https://www.kbklawyers.com/ Legal AF Substack: https://substack.com/@legalaf Follow Legal AF on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/legalafmtn.bsky.social Follow Michael Popok on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/mspopok.bsky.social Subscribe to the Legal AF by MeidasTouch podcast here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/legal-af-by-meidastouch/id1580828595

Top Comments (10)

@renatehall2429 2025-12-25

Thank you, Governor Pritzker!!!!!

71 2 replies
@Bubbaathome 2025-12-25

Never seen a US government work so hard with taxpayer money to harm its citizens.

65 6 replies
@BrianSmith-yn2zg 2025-12-25

Shame that congress won't do their job.

47 5 replies
@jamesbarisitz4794 2025-12-25

Anything and everything that makes ICE work harder is a good thing.

46
@meerapatankar7275 2025-12-25

Federal agents / ICE should be required to identify themselves when approaching the public. This is totally for the safety and protection of the people.

43 1 replies
@dianelittle3040 2025-12-25

I'm glad they did it. He has to be stopped

39
@ski1749 2025-12-25

Didnt scotus say ice have to leave Illinois?

14 1 replies
@mariejo7408 2025-12-25

Ice must get sued when people died on they hands. Identify for all Ice

13
@joleneb7182 2025-12-25

Any state MUST have the right to arrest and prosecute ANY federal officer who breaks the peace. PERIOD. 🐱

9
@dannytwist3683 2025-12-25

They sue, delay the F out of this suit like DT does.

8

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot