NY Post Doesn’t Hold Back Against Candace Owens
Related videos
HE DOSEN’T CARE
Timcast IRL
20.6k views
HE WON AGAIN
Timcast IRL
42.5k views
Trump DOJ INDICTS Comey AGAIN | Timcast IRL w/ Tim Pool
Timcast IRL
80.5k views
NEW Conspiracy Says Candace Owens & Nick Fuentes FUNDED By SPLC | Tim Pool
Timcast
54.5k views
Candace Owens Calls Trump White House SATANIC, Says Trump Must Be REMOVED
Timcast IRL
37.4k views
Candace Owens Says Trump Had Charlie Kirk KILLED For Israel | Tim Pool
Timcast
53.5k views
HE COULD DO IT
Timcast IRL
63.1k views
HE COULD DO IT
Timcast IRL
60.9k views
HE DID IT AGAIN
Timcast IRL
40.9k views
IT DOESN’T WORK
Timcast IRL
9.2k views
Analyzing Candace Owens' Extreme Narrative Escalation and Media Leverage
Discover the specific tactics Candace Owens allegedly uses to drive engagement through sensational claims, and examine why industry peers may hesitate to challenge her controversial trajectory.
Short Summary
- The New York Post editorial board sharply criticized Candace Owens, questioning her grip on reality regarding assassination plots. (00:00:00)
- Hosts argue Owens employs "social engineering" and assumptive reasoning, contrasting her style with Alex Jones’ reliance on news reports. (01:34)
- Owens allegedly benefits from specific platform biases, maintaining high viewership despite promoting claims that lead to the criticism of figures like Charlie Kirk. (05:30)
- The discussion critiques the Right's tendency to avoid confronting internal issues, resulting in institutional weakness against political opponents. (10:02)
This segment dissects the nature of Candace Owens' recent high-profile claims, including allegations regarding French officials and Bridget Macron, contextualizing them within broader media manipulation techniques. The panel analyzes the perceived incentives for her escalating behavior, particularly in light of the fallout from Charlie Kirk's assassination claims that previously linked her campaign to TPUSA.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
HE DOSEN’T CARE
Timcast IRL
20.6k views
HE WON AGAIN
Timcast IRL
42.5k views
Trump DOJ INDICTS Comey AGAIN | Timcast IRL w/ Tim Pool
Timcast IRL
80.5k views
NEW Conspiracy Says Candace Owens & Nick Fuentes FUNDED By SPLC | Tim Pool
Timcast
54.5k views
Candace Owens Calls Trump White House SATANIC, Says Trump Must Be REMOVED
Timcast IRL
37.4k views
Candace Owens Says Trump Had Charlie Kirk KILLED For Israel | Tim Pool
Timcast
53.5k views
HE COULD DO IT
Timcast IRL
63.1k views
HE COULD DO IT
Timcast IRL
60.9k views
HE DID IT AGAIN
Timcast IRL
40.9k views
IT DOESN’T WORK
Timcast IRL
9.2k views
Top Comments (10)
CO is using this as an attempt to get the Macrons lawsuit off her back. So transparent.
Listen, whether I agree with Candace or not, the last thing we need is for the corporate media dictating whether or not someone is “crazy.” Remember how many “conspiracy theories” were proven right in the last 10 years. Don't fall it. If you don’t agree or like it, tune out. Don’t give media the license to say who is crazy or not.
Wasn't it her that started the rumor saying you cannot openly criticized Israel on the internet? Who started this???? Because its all i see ALL fuckin Day Long
They're right
For service purposes, that address is her Registered Agents. Persons that accept service on her bahalf.
They were friends at a time but I find it weird she can only share texts from 2018 and not after.
I learned the hard way not to fully trust journalism after a Washington Post reporter mis-represented something I said, despite using my exact words. This was in college back in 2010, and I was being asked about my perspective on the incoming president of the school (Catholic University in DC), and of the president who was leaving. Mind you, the one leaving was a priest and we all adored him. But I had said something about being intimidated due to how “famous” in the Catholic world he was. This would be like Neville saying this about Dumbledoor. My follow up sentence wasn’t included, and it made me sound like I hated the guy. I was mortified that anyone reading the article would see my name next to the quote and think I was relived he was gone. Sad, but I suppose wasn’t surprising that WaPo would want to take the angle of hating the Church.
Candy has been trying to bury people who have fired her. She just sounds bat shit crazy . I don't think she can be helped.
It was confirmed through TP USA that Charles and Candace had not spoken in over 2 years so maybe you need to correct the fact they were friends and according to people close to Charles he said they were working acquaintances not friends. Charles did not invite Candice to his wedding
What truth she don't know but she knows knows. She said
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
CO is using this as an attempt to get the Macrons lawsuit off her back. So transparent.
Listen, whether I agree with Candace or not, the last thing we need is for the corporate media dictating whether or not someone is “crazy.” Remember how many “conspiracy theories” were proven right in the last 10 years. Don't fall it. If you don’t agree or like it, tune out. Don’t give media the license to say who is crazy or not.
Wasn't it her that started the rumor saying you cannot openly criticized Israel on the internet? Who started this???? Because its all i see ALL fuckin Day Long
They're right
For service purposes, that address is her Registered Agents. Persons that accept service on her bahalf.
They were friends at a time but I find it weird she can only share texts from 2018 and not after.
I learned the hard way not to fully trust journalism after a Washington Post reporter mis-represented something I said, despite using my exact words. This was in college back in 2010, and I was being asked about my perspective on the incoming president of the school (Catholic University in DC), and of the president who was leaving. Mind you, the one leaving was a priest and we all adored him. But I had said something about being intimidated due to how “famous” in the Catholic world he was. This would be like Neville saying this about Dumbledoor. My follow up sentence wasn’t included, and it made me sound like I hated the guy. I was mortified that anyone reading the article would see my name next to the quote and think I was relived he was gone. Sad, but I suppose wasn’t surprising that WaPo would want to take the angle of hating the Church.
Candy has been trying to bury people who have fired her. She just sounds bat shit crazy . I don't think she can be helped.
It was confirmed through TP USA that Charles and Candace had not spoken in over 2 years so maybe you need to correct the fact they were friends and according to people close to Charles he said they were working acquaintances not friends. Charles did not invite Candice to his wedding
What truth she don't know but she knows knows. She said