Noam Chomsky's DIRE WARNING On ChatGPT | Breaking Points
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
SLIPPERY SLOPE TO OBLIVION: Mearsheimer DIRE WARNING On Russia/Ukraine
Breaking Points
103.8k views
Pope's DIRE WARNING: AI Could Destroy Humanity
Breaking Points
48.0k views
Trump CALLS BACK Iran Attack After Military DIRE WARNING
Breaking Points
312.8k views
Heinz CEO DIRE WARNING: People Running Out Of Money
Breaking Points
258.0k views
Tim Dillon Says US LOSING 'S*** Talking' War
Breaking Points
177.5k views
US Farmers DIRE WARNING: NO FERTILIZER From Iran War
Breaking Points
221.4k views
World Leaders DIRE WARNING: 'Can't Sleep' Over Iran Crisis
Breaking Points
280.9k views
Oil Execs DIRE WARNING TO Trump: Worst Is Yet To Come
Breaking Points
227.4k views
Only 1/4 Of US Support Trump's War
Breaking Points
50.6k views
Top Generals DIRE WARNING: Iran War Will Be Disaster
Breaking Points
123.7k views
Top Comments (10)
ChatGPT isn't going to replace journalists who investigate and uncover news. It's going to replace YouTubers who read the news articles that journalists write after their investigation.
I'm surprised neither had knowledge of Borges. I highly recommend that they read his work, especially Library of Babel (which I believe was what they had in mind in referencing him), as it could be seen as relevant to the concern over the implications of generative ai programs eventually cannibalizing their own data.
Borges: Brilliant 20th century who never wrote a novel, but produced intense, weird short stories, including one about an infinite library. A memorable writer.
I understand what they mean but in my opinion the real issue to watch out for is the tendency for corporations to push off their obligations to systems like this in an attempt to pawn off liability. Imagine your surgery denied coverage because the new case manager bot that your insurance company uses says your doctor's diagnosis is inconsistent.
The largest issue with AGI is that it will be very difficult to determine when we are getting close. Deep learning couldve taken another decade or even a decade less to stumble upon. We have no idea when the next major novel breakthrough will come and from where. Nick Bostrom made an excellent case that AGI has no road map and will be stumbled upon.
5 years ago, GPT was still basically a concept. 3 years ago, it was interesting in parts but seemed a decade away from something the public to get excited about. Yet late in 2022, it basically released to the public and stunned people: it was like a pretty smart friend who seemed to have had a late night: Fairly capable most times in certain areas but could make some silly mistakes. Now with GPT-4? A really, really smart individual in a number of areas who doesn't make mistakes that often in most areas.
South Park just had a great episode on ChatGPT.
2:10 My irony-detecting ML model's F-score tanked when Saagar googled "Borgesian" in real time while Krystal was discussing an article saying that AI cannot replace human intelligence.
He's correct. I tried coming up with backgrounds for D&D magic items, and after a little prodding, all it gave me was the most clichéd tales about elves and good and evil.
A very useful discussion. Thanks.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
ChatGPT isn't going to replace journalists who investigate and uncover news. It's going to replace YouTubers who read the news articles that journalists write after their investigation.
I'm surprised neither had knowledge of Borges. I highly recommend that they read his work, especially Library of Babel (which I believe was what they had in mind in referencing him), as it could be seen as relevant to the concern over the implications of generative ai programs eventually cannibalizing their own data.
Borges: Brilliant 20th century who never wrote a novel, but produced intense, weird short stories, including one about an infinite library. A memorable writer.
I understand what they mean but in my opinion the real issue to watch out for is the tendency for corporations to push off their obligations to systems like this in an attempt to pawn off liability. Imagine your surgery denied coverage because the new case manager bot that your insurance company uses says your doctor's diagnosis is inconsistent.
The largest issue with AGI is that it will be very difficult to determine when we are getting close. Deep learning couldve taken another decade or even a decade less to stumble upon. We have no idea when the next major novel breakthrough will come and from where. Nick Bostrom made an excellent case that AGI has no road map and will be stumbled upon.
5 years ago, GPT was still basically a concept. 3 years ago, it was interesting in parts but seemed a decade away from something the public to get excited about. Yet late in 2022, it basically released to the public and stunned people: it was like a pretty smart friend who seemed to have had a late night: Fairly capable most times in certain areas but could make some silly mistakes. Now with GPT-4? A really, really smart individual in a number of areas who doesn't make mistakes that often in most areas.
South Park just had a great episode on ChatGPT.
2:10 My irony-detecting ML model's F-score tanked when Saagar googled "Borgesian" in real time while Krystal was discussing an article saying that AI cannot replace human intelligence.
He's correct. I tried coming up with backgrounds for D&D magic items, and after a little prodding, all it gave me was the most clichéd tales about elves and good and evil.
A very useful discussion. Thanks.