SECTION 230 IN JEOPARDY

No company should ever have immunity from liability its simply crazy that they do

Need a DIGITAL BILL OF RIGHTS.

Section 230 should be re-written to: 1. Define what a platform is. 2. Define what a content provider is. 3. Prevent platforms from removing content or denying service without a warrant. 4. If a platform removes content they must state who authorized its removal and why it was removed. 5. If a platform suspends or removes content, they can be sued.

You should be able to sue any company, any politician.

I think I don't want youtube to be in charge of the First Amendment

Congress is full of fake Republicans, and enemies of the citizens.

They won’t do anything. Recent history proves me right

Congress doesn’t need to repeal Section 230, it needs to clarify it. Anchor “otherwise objectionable” to objective, established standards, enforce meaningful “good faith” limits, and address algorithmic editorial control that functions like publishing. At the same time, recognize that dominant platforms operate as functional public forums or common carriers. This approach preserves innovation and liability protection while restoring accountability, ensuring lawful speech is protected and preventing selective censorship from hiding behind vague moderation powers.

Good they shouldn't have had any immunity when they decided to start acting as editors and censoring ppl. And not just publishers. 😮

It's correct, if they want to keep 230 protection the only thing they should be allowed to censor from being posted on their site is child porn. Anything other than that is free an open speech and the entire reason 230 exist, if they want to limit speech then they can be responsible for what people are saying.