SECTION 230 IN JEOPARDY
Related videos
SHE’S LOST IT
Timcast IRL
72.7k views
HE JUST QUIT
Timcast IRL
27.2k views
THEY SHOT HIM
Timcast IRL
71.4k views
ITS OVER
Timcast IRL
57.7k views
CULTURE IN COLLAPSE
Timcast IRL
40.5k views
HE LOST IT
Timcast IRL
23.4k views
THEY CHOSE MIGRATION
Timcast IRL
26.4k views
ELECTIONS ARE DEAD
Timcast IRL
72.3k views
TRUMP’S SECRET PLAN
Timcast IRL
42.5k views
SEND IN THE FEDS
Timcast IRL
76.7k views
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
SHE’S LOST IT
Timcast IRL
72.7k views
HE JUST QUIT
Timcast IRL
27.2k views
THEY SHOT HIM
Timcast IRL
71.4k views
ITS OVER
Timcast IRL
57.7k views
CULTURE IN COLLAPSE
Timcast IRL
40.5k views
HE LOST IT
Timcast IRL
23.4k views
THEY CHOSE MIGRATION
Timcast IRL
26.4k views
ELECTIONS ARE DEAD
Timcast IRL
72.3k views
TRUMP’S SECRET PLAN
Timcast IRL
42.5k views
SEND IN THE FEDS
Timcast IRL
76.7k views
Top Comments (10)
No company should ever have immunity from liability its simply crazy that they do
Need a DIGITAL BILL OF RIGHTS.
Section 230 should be re-written to: 1. Define what a platform is. 2. Define what a content provider is. 3. Prevent platforms from removing content or denying service without a warrant. 4. If a platform removes content they must state who authorized its removal and why it was removed. 5. If a platform suspends or removes content, they can be sued.
You should be able to sue any company, any politician.
I think I don't want youtube to be in charge of the First Amendment
This woman is precisely why not everyone should be allowed to vote.
Congress is full of fake Republicans, and enemies of the citizens.
They won’t do anything. Recent history proves me right
The amount of people supporting section 230's removal is disheartening. They don't understand what it means.
Why are all our laws capable of being interpreted as "gatcha" laws. Like wtf are we even doing
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
No company should ever have immunity from liability its simply crazy that they do
Need a DIGITAL BILL OF RIGHTS.
Section 230 should be re-written to: 1. Define what a platform is. 2. Define what a content provider is. 3. Prevent platforms from removing content or denying service without a warrant. 4. If a platform removes content they must state who authorized its removal and why it was removed. 5. If a platform suspends or removes content, they can be sued.
You should be able to sue any company, any politician.
I think I don't want youtube to be in charge of the First Amendment
This woman is precisely why not everyone should be allowed to vote.
Congress is full of fake Republicans, and enemies of the citizens.
They won’t do anything. Recent history proves me right
The amount of people supporting section 230's removal is disheartening. They don't understand what it means.
Why are all our laws capable of being interpreted as "gatcha" laws. Like wtf are we even doing