Krystal And Saagar DEBATE: Should TikTok Be BANNED | Breaking Points
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Krystal And Saagar DEBATE Jasmine Crockett TX Primary
Breaking Points
57.1k views
Krystal And Saagar DEBATE: Can Zohran Actually Succeed?
Breaking Points
154.5k views
Krystal and Saagar DEBATE: Is Totalitarianism HERE?
Breaking Points
171.6k views
Krystal And Saagar DEBATE 'Trantifa'
Breaking Points
134.3k views
Krystal and Saagar DEBATE Alligator Alcatraz
Breaking Points
98.9k views
Krystal And Saagar DEBATE Trump University Crackdown
Breaking Points
71.8k views
Krystal And Saagar DEBATE Gavin Newsom, Bannon Podcast
Breaking Points
159.6k views
Krystal And Saagar DEBATE Trump Ukraine Minerals Deal
Breaking Points
107.3k views
Krystal And Saagar DEBATE Pentagon PURGE
Breaking Points
119.0k views
Krystal And Saagar DEBATE Trump Union Backstabbing
Breaking Points
66.3k views
Top Comments (10)
We need more debate videos. It is great to see a duo that can have a civil debate.
Yes, both things are in fact correct. The best part about not being subject to binary purity tests is the ability to see that two different ideas can in fact be true at the same time.
At this point I have zero expectation of privacy online. Absolutely none.
Ultimately vs. Literally debate
I get about 20 junk phone calls a day. Sometimes I ask them, "Where did you get my name from?" The most common answer is, "Experian." I've called these credit reporting companies in the past and told them that I don't want them to disclose any of my information without my specific permission. They still keep coming. This has been going on for years, consumer activists have complained about it, and Congress refuses to do anything significant about it. I assume that's because the credit reporting companies, as part of the financial industry, are paying them off with (legal) financial contributions. (Biden has always been one of the main beneficiaries.) So I don't believe this national security argument. If the Chinese wanted this data, they could buy it from Experian.
Banning TikTok is the strategy of META and company. They want their competition targeted while avoiding any binding regulations on them.
It's disingenuous for lawmakers or political figures to use data privacy as an excuse when they have NO interest in incorporating any data privacy laws...
I wonder if there is a direct effect from the amount of people that make a living from social media/ influencers to the housing market/ job market
More debates pleaaaase
Great debate, guys. More content like this, please.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
We need more debate videos. It is great to see a duo that can have a civil debate.
Yes, both things are in fact correct. The best part about not being subject to binary purity tests is the ability to see that two different ideas can in fact be true at the same time.
At this point I have zero expectation of privacy online. Absolutely none.
Ultimately vs. Literally debate
I get about 20 junk phone calls a day. Sometimes I ask them, "Where did you get my name from?" The most common answer is, "Experian." I've called these credit reporting companies in the past and told them that I don't want them to disclose any of my information without my specific permission. They still keep coming. This has been going on for years, consumer activists have complained about it, and Congress refuses to do anything significant about it. I assume that's because the credit reporting companies, as part of the financial industry, are paying them off with (legal) financial contributions. (Biden has always been one of the main beneficiaries.) So I don't believe this national security argument. If the Chinese wanted this data, they could buy it from Experian.
Banning TikTok is the strategy of META and company. They want their competition targeted while avoiding any binding regulations on them.
It's disingenuous for lawmakers or political figures to use data privacy as an excuse when they have NO interest in incorporating any data privacy laws...
I wonder if there is a direct effect from the amount of people that make a living from social media/ influencers to the housing market/ job market
More debates pleaaaase
Great debate, guys. More content like this, please.