One Theory Connects Everything! AdS/CFT Correspondence Demystified
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Film Theory: Everything You Need to Know About Backrooms (Compilation)
The Film Theorists
135.8k views
Every operating system concept in one video…
Fireship
114.1k views
Gunfire at White House Correspondents’ Dinner; Trump Holds Press Event
The Bulwark
253.2k views
This Hack Just Broke DeFi… And Exposed Everything
Coin Bureau
69.2k views
Trump Deletes EVERYTHING then RUNS OFF!
Adam Mockler
500.9k views
Everything needs to change
Theo - t3․gg
133.3k views
Sam Stein: Trump’s Chief of Staff Confessed Everything
The Bulwark
36.6k views
This is CRAZY 💥 Undeniable Geophysical Proof that EVERYTHING is Connected Together!
Stefan Burns
349.7k views
Film Theory: Everything You Need To Know Before FNAF 2
The Film Theorists
22.3k views
The Most Precise Artificial Sweetener Study Was Just Conducted on Humans (changes everything)
Thomas DeLauer
161.3k views
Top Comments (10)
Thank you Arvin . So much on the internet is whackadoodle, I appreciate your clear voice of reason.
Never heard this complicated theory described so well before. Thanks Arvin!!!
Arvin love your videos but I think you might have a mistake here when you say gravitons don’t exist in ADS CFT theories: Yes, from the CFT perspective, gravity may not be fundamental. It emerges in the large-N, strong coupling limit as a dual description of the CFT. But in all AdS/CFT dualities, gravitons exist as real bulk fields, they are just dual to conserved stress energy tensors in the boundary CFT.
Try the best online learning platform FREE for 30 days: http://brilliant.org/arvinash - Get a 20% discount on the annual premium subscription if you subscribe! Many thanks to Brilliant for sponsoring this video!
Lajos Diosi (1989) and Roger Penrose (1996) independently introduced, by different methods, what I think is the mechanism on how the boundary (CFT) maps to the bulk (AdS). Quantum superposition violates the equivalence principle. The equivalence principle dates back to Galileo and Newton, the inertial mass in F = ma is the same as gravitational mass, the m in F = GMm/r² F (inertial) = F (gravity) ma = GMm/r² a = m/m (GM/r²) a = GM/r² (This derivation is found in most university physics textbooks) This is why different masses fall at the same rate and why gravity is about just about acceleration. Which is what lead Einstein to say inertial acceleration is the same as gravitational acceleration. Penrose argues that the mass distribution of a system in quantum superposition means the gravitational mass of the system is different than the inertial mass of the system. Which is a violation of the equivalence principle. But just like how virtual particles can exist without violating conservation of energy by "borrowing" energy for short period of time, using the Heisenberg uncertainty for energy and time ∆t∆E ≧ ħ, the decay of the quantum superposition state is t_decay = ħ/E The decay of the quantum superposition state is inversely proportional to the energy of the system. This effect for molecules is in the nanosecond range making it a testable hypothesis. What's interesting is that the decay of the superposition state also could be applied to the arrow of time. Instead of thinking of it as a decay of a quantum superposition, where time has no meaning like in entanglement between the properties of two particles, time (and distances) is an emergent phenomenon from the objective collapse of quantum superposition.
This is creating a loophole in my brain. It seems to be both completely nonsense but also very possible and logic... fascinating
This is the best explanation of this theory I’ve heard. Thank you.
By far the best introductory video to the AdS/CFT duality ever done!!
Been waiting waiting patiently for another Arvin Ash banger
welcome back from your holidays Arvin
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Thank you Arvin . So much on the internet is whackadoodle, I appreciate your clear voice of reason.
Never heard this complicated theory described so well before. Thanks Arvin!!!
Arvin love your videos but I think you might have a mistake here when you say gravitons don’t exist in ADS CFT theories: Yes, from the CFT perspective, gravity may not be fundamental. It emerges in the large-N, strong coupling limit as a dual description of the CFT. But in all AdS/CFT dualities, gravitons exist as real bulk fields, they are just dual to conserved stress energy tensors in the boundary CFT.
Try the best online learning platform FREE for 30 days: http://brilliant.org/arvinash - Get a 20% discount on the annual premium subscription if you subscribe! Many thanks to Brilliant for sponsoring this video!
Lajos Diosi (1989) and Roger Penrose (1996) independently introduced, by different methods, what I think is the mechanism on how the boundary (CFT) maps to the bulk (AdS). Quantum superposition violates the equivalence principle. The equivalence principle dates back to Galileo and Newton, the inertial mass in F = ma is the same as gravitational mass, the m in F = GMm/r² F (inertial) = F (gravity) ma = GMm/r² a = m/m (GM/r²) a = GM/r² (This derivation is found in most university physics textbooks) This is why different masses fall at the same rate and why gravity is about just about acceleration. Which is what lead Einstein to say inertial acceleration is the same as gravitational acceleration. Penrose argues that the mass distribution of a system in quantum superposition means the gravitational mass of the system is different than the inertial mass of the system. Which is a violation of the equivalence principle. But just like how virtual particles can exist without violating conservation of energy by "borrowing" energy for short period of time, using the Heisenberg uncertainty for energy and time ∆t∆E ≧ ħ, the decay of the quantum superposition state is t_decay = ħ/E The decay of the quantum superposition state is inversely proportional to the energy of the system. This effect for molecules is in the nanosecond range making it a testable hypothesis. What's interesting is that the decay of the superposition state also could be applied to the arrow of time. Instead of thinking of it as a decay of a quantum superposition, where time has no meaning like in entanglement between the properties of two particles, time (and distances) is an emergent phenomenon from the objective collapse of quantum superposition.
This is creating a loophole in my brain. It seems to be both completely nonsense but also very possible and logic... fascinating
This is the best explanation of this theory I’ve heard. Thank you.
By far the best introductory video to the AdS/CFT duality ever done!!
Been waiting waiting patiently for another Arvin Ash banger
welcome back from your holidays Arvin