The Clintons, Charlie Kirk & The Wikipedia SCAM of the Century EXPOSED
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
The Death of Britain Will Come in 2029
andrew gold | heretics.
96.9k views
The Numbers That PROVE The Elites Are KILLING Us
andrew gold | heretics.
25.7k views
The West Is Having An Autistic MELTDOWN | Prof. Ed Dutton
andrew gold | heretics.
20.1k views
George Michael's Goddaughter EXPOSES The Royal Family's Darkest Secrets
andrew gold | heretics.
180.0k views
The Real Reason I'm No Longer On TV
andrew gold | heretics.
44.5k views
BBC Bias EXPOSED? My Heated Clash With Chris Packham
andrew gold | heretics.
200.1k views
The DARK Truth About Prince Andrew & Epstein
andrew gold | heretics.
217.1k views
I Confront the Cambridge Student ‘Famous’ for Debating Charlie Kirk
andrew gold | heretics.
137.2k views
The Moment That SHOCKED the Studio - Dr. Helen Webberley vs Andrew Gold
andrew gold | heretics.
299.7k views
The BBC Actually Told Diana The King Planned to MURDER Her
andrew gold | heretics.
288.3k views
Top Comments (10)
It's disgusting that Wikipedia beg so often for donations, acting as though they are some struggling website.
This is a REALLY important topic! As a software engineer working in this space the clear bias of Wikipedia is bad enough, but when you inherit that into the AI it is truly scary
Wikipedia is globalist propoganda. It has never, for as long as I have been aware of it, been neutral, nor truthful.
Hearing the BBC called a reliable source nearly had me choking on my drink!
Keep those old Encyclopaedia tomes safe in your attic folks, you don't know how important they'll become when we've forgotten our own history!
I put these out 24 hours early in the 'community posts' of Heretics. In return, all I ask - like, subscribe and comment! Here are your timestamps: 0:00 Ashley Rindsberg Highlights 1:10 Wikipedia Can Ruin Our Lives 3:10 The Clintons Did THIS 6:10 Charlie Kirk’s Wikipedia 8:10 George Floyd, Iryna Zarutska & Charlie Kirk 11:10 Andrew Can’t Get A Wikipedia Page 12:10 The Truth About The Dark Agencies! 14:35 The Daily Mail Is Wiki’s Enemy 18:00 Iryna Zarutska: What Really Happened 20:10 This is Malicious! 23:00 Konstantin Kisin’s Point About Charlie Kirk 24:10 What The Left Really Care About 26:10 Kyle Rittenhouse Hypocrisy 29:40 Grooming Gangs - They Blamed Us! 34:10 Maniacs In Charge 37:00 Greta Thunberg A Proven Liar 38:40 Reddit & Bluesky Madness 41:10 Elon Musk & Sam Altman 44:10 Woke Football Players 47:10 How We Can Push Back Against This 49:30 Alternatives to Wikipedia 50:40 A Heretic Ashley Rindsberg Admires
And every time I get on Wikipedia, they beg me for money to keep them online. Now, I'm glad that I've never given them a single dime!
When I was in college if the professor found out you used Wikipedia your paper would be trashed.
This whole “left vs right” narrative is one of the oldest scams in the political playbook. It’s not real, it’s a marketing scheme. Kings, empires, and now media conglomerates have been running this divide and rule tactic for centuries. They hand you two jerseys, tell you to pick a side, then sit back and watch you fight while they collect the money, pass the laws, and keep power locked up. They’ve trained you to ask, “Was it a Democrat or Republican? Left or right?” instead of the only question that matters: Was it right or wrong? Good or evil? You don’t fix a burning house by arguing over which team’s colour the arsonist was wearing, you find out why the fire started and stop it from happening again. Look at history. The French Revolution literally invented the “left” and “right” seating arrangement in parliament. It was never about morals, it was about factions of elites fighting over who got to rule. The labels stuck because they work. Fast forward to today and it’s the same script with a shinier logo. Corporate media, political parties, even social media algorithms profit from your outrage, your tribalism, your clicks. And while you’re arguing over colours, policies that actually hurt everyone like mass surveillance, endless wars, corporate bailouts, food monopolies, housing crises, pass quietly in the background. The people at the top don’t care which flag you wave as long as you stay divided. If we actually moved like God was in the room 24/7, half this mess wouldn’t even exist. Because at that point you’re accountable to something higher than a party, a pundit, or a talking point. But morality doesn’t sell, division does. Stop playing on their chessboard. Stop wearing their jerseys. Start asking the real questions. The moment enough people stop seeing “left vs right” and start seeing “right vs wrong,” the whole game collapses. “Left vs Right” is a puppet show. The strings are money, the stage is media, and the audience is us tearing each other apart while the real thieves walk out the back door with the loot. It was never Left vs Right. It’s Top vs Bottom. The people vs the powerful. The day we stop fighting over colours and start uniting over truth, they lose everything.
"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell, 1984
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
It's disgusting that Wikipedia beg so often for donations, acting as though they are some struggling website.
This is a REALLY important topic! As a software engineer working in this space the clear bias of Wikipedia is bad enough, but when you inherit that into the AI it is truly scary
Wikipedia is globalist propoganda. It has never, for as long as I have been aware of it, been neutral, nor truthful.
Hearing the BBC called a reliable source nearly had me choking on my drink!
Keep those old Encyclopaedia tomes safe in your attic folks, you don't know how important they'll become when we've forgotten our own history!
I put these out 24 hours early in the 'community posts' of Heretics. In return, all I ask - like, subscribe and comment! Here are your timestamps: 0:00 Ashley Rindsberg Highlights 1:10 Wikipedia Can Ruin Our Lives 3:10 The Clintons Did THIS 6:10 Charlie Kirk’s Wikipedia 8:10 George Floyd, Iryna Zarutska & Charlie Kirk 11:10 Andrew Can’t Get A Wikipedia Page 12:10 The Truth About The Dark Agencies! 14:35 The Daily Mail Is Wiki’s Enemy 18:00 Iryna Zarutska: What Really Happened 20:10 This is Malicious! 23:00 Konstantin Kisin’s Point About Charlie Kirk 24:10 What The Left Really Care About 26:10 Kyle Rittenhouse Hypocrisy 29:40 Grooming Gangs - They Blamed Us! 34:10 Maniacs In Charge 37:00 Greta Thunberg A Proven Liar 38:40 Reddit & Bluesky Madness 41:10 Elon Musk & Sam Altman 44:10 Woke Football Players 47:10 How We Can Push Back Against This 49:30 Alternatives to Wikipedia 50:40 A Heretic Ashley Rindsberg Admires
And every time I get on Wikipedia, they beg me for money to keep them online. Now, I'm glad that I've never given them a single dime!
When I was in college if the professor found out you used Wikipedia your paper would be trashed.
This whole “left vs right” narrative is one of the oldest scams in the political playbook. It’s not real, it’s a marketing scheme. Kings, empires, and now media conglomerates have been running this divide and rule tactic for centuries. They hand you two jerseys, tell you to pick a side, then sit back and watch you fight while they collect the money, pass the laws, and keep power locked up. They’ve trained you to ask, “Was it a Democrat or Republican? Left or right?” instead of the only question that matters: Was it right or wrong? Good or evil? You don’t fix a burning house by arguing over which team’s colour the arsonist was wearing, you find out why the fire started and stop it from happening again. Look at history. The French Revolution literally invented the “left” and “right” seating arrangement in parliament. It was never about morals, it was about factions of elites fighting over who got to rule. The labels stuck because they work. Fast forward to today and it’s the same script with a shinier logo. Corporate media, political parties, even social media algorithms profit from your outrage, your tribalism, your clicks. And while you’re arguing over colours, policies that actually hurt everyone like mass surveillance, endless wars, corporate bailouts, food monopolies, housing crises, pass quietly in the background. The people at the top don’t care which flag you wave as long as you stay divided. If we actually moved like God was in the room 24/7, half this mess wouldn’t even exist. Because at that point you’re accountable to something higher than a party, a pundit, or a talking point. But morality doesn’t sell, division does. Stop playing on their chessboard. Stop wearing their jerseys. Start asking the real questions. The moment enough people stop seeing “left vs right” and start seeing “right vs wrong,” the whole game collapses. “Left vs Right” is a puppet show. The strings are money, the stage is media, and the audience is us tearing each other apart while the real thieves walk out the back door with the loot. It was never Left vs Right. It’s Top vs Bottom. The people vs the powerful. The day we stop fighting over colours and start uniting over truth, they lose everything.
"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell, 1984