Navigate Select ESC Close

The Clintons, Charlie Kirk & The Wikipedia SCAM of the Century EXPOSED

2025-09-22 People & Blogs
469.9k
23.3k
3.1k
andrew gold | heretics.
andrew gold | heretics.
788.0k subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

Wikipedia isn’t just an online encyclopedia—it’s the backbone of the internet. From Google search results to AI training models, it shapes the information billions of people see every single day. But what if the platform has been hijacked by hidden agendas, activist editors, and dark networks working behind the scenes? Follow Ashley Rindsberg here: https://x.com/AshleyRindsberg Get his writings here: https://npov.substack.com/ In this explosive interview, journalist and author Ashley Rindsberg exposes the shocking truth about how Wikipedia really works—and why it’s far more dangerous than you think. We discuss how powerful figures can manipulate narratives, how controversial topics from grooming gangs to Kyle Rittenhouse get rewritten, why certain murders are buried, and how anyone who challenges the system—whether it’s Charlie Kirk, Elon Musk, or even independent journalists—gets targeted. Ashley reveals how Wikipedia editors attack reputations, censor stories that don’t fit the narrative, and even transform encyclopedic entries into propaganda tools. We dig into the billion-dollar industry of paid Wikipedia editing, the war against outlets like the Daily Mail, and the frightening way this information monopoly is now feeding artificial intelligence systems that will shape the future. If you’ve ever trusted Wikipedia—or relied on Google—you need to hear this conversation. UPDATE: Presumably after watching this, somebody did put up a wikipedia page for me: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Gold_(journalist) I thanked the editor, who I saw made these brilliant films, really funny, take a look: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M38tziyIOXQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSl_KzlkZmU #Wikipedia #FreeSpeech #Heretics Chapters: 0:00 Ashley Rindsberg Highlights 1:10 Wikipedia Can Ruin Our Lives 3:10 The Clintons Did THIS 6:10 Charlie Kirk’s Wikipedia 8:10 George Floyd, Iryna Zarutska & Charlie Kirk 11:10 Andrew Can’t Get A Wikipedia Page 12:10 The Truth About The Dark Agencies! 14:35 The Daily Mail Is Wiki’s Enemy 18:00 Iryna Zarutska: What Really Happened 20:10 This is Malicious! 23:00 Konstantin Kisin’s Point About Charlie Kirk 24:10 What The Left Really Care About 26:10 Kyle Rittenhouse Hypocrisy 29:40 Grooming Gangs - They Blamed Us! 34:10 Maniacs In Charge 37:00 Greta Thunberg A Proven Liar 38:40 Reddit & Bluesky Madness 41:10 Elon Musk & Sam Altman 44:10 Woke Football Players 47:10 How We Can Push Back Against This 49:30 Alternatives to Wikipedia 50:40 A Heretic Ashley Rindsberg Admires

Top Comments (10)

@pinkskyatnight6569 2025-09-22

It's disgusting that Wikipedia beg so often for donations, acting as though they are some struggling website.

980 53 replies
@ellenberes4888 2025-09-22

This is a REALLY important topic! As a software engineer working in this space the clear bias of Wikipedia is bad enough, but when you inherit that into the AI it is truly scary

976 43 replies
@farinshore8900 2025-09-21

Wikipedia is globalist propoganda. It has never, for as long as I have been aware of it, been neutral, nor truthful.

940 37 replies
@BigAl53750 2025-09-23

Hearing the BBC called a reliable source nearly had me choking on my drink!

562 30 replies
@rickrivethead 2025-09-23

Keep those old Encyclopaedia tomes safe in your attic folks, you don't know how important they'll become when we've forgotten our own history!

514 27 replies
@andrewgoldheretics 2025-09-21

I put these out 24 hours early in the 'community posts' of Heretics. In return, all I ask - like, subscribe and comment! Here are your timestamps: 0:00 Ashley Rindsberg Highlights 1:10 Wikipedia Can Ruin Our Lives 3:10 The Clintons Did THIS 6:10 Charlie Kirk’s Wikipedia 8:10 George Floyd, Iryna Zarutska & Charlie Kirk 11:10 Andrew Can’t Get A Wikipedia Page 12:10 The Truth About The Dark Agencies! 14:35 The Daily Mail Is Wiki’s Enemy 18:00 Iryna Zarutska: What Really Happened 20:10 This is Malicious! 23:00 Konstantin Kisin’s Point About Charlie Kirk 24:10 What The Left Really Care About 26:10 Kyle Rittenhouse Hypocrisy 29:40 Grooming Gangs - They Blamed Us! 34:10 Maniacs In Charge 37:00 Greta Thunberg A Proven Liar 38:40 Reddit & Bluesky Madness 41:10 Elon Musk & Sam Altman 44:10 Woke Football Players 47:10 How We Can Push Back Against This 49:30 Alternatives to Wikipedia 50:40 A Heretic Ashley Rindsberg Admires

260 47 replies
@jamesflanagan7693 2025-09-29

And every time I get on Wikipedia, they beg me for money to keep them online. Now, I'm glad that I've never given them a single dime!

120 3 replies
@bleukettu4521 2025-09-22

When I was in college if the professor found out you used Wikipedia your paper would be trashed.

113 3 replies
@TheRoyalFamily416 2025-09-27

This whole “left vs right” narrative is one of the oldest scams in the political playbook. It’s not real, it’s a marketing scheme. Kings, empires, and now media conglomerates have been running this divide and rule tactic for centuries. They hand you two jerseys, tell you to pick a side, then sit back and watch you fight while they collect the money, pass the laws, and keep power locked up. They’ve trained you to ask, “Was it a Democrat or Republican? Left or right?” instead of the only question that matters: Was it right or wrong? Good or evil? You don’t fix a burning house by arguing over which team’s colour the arsonist was wearing, you find out why the fire started and stop it from happening again. Look at history. The French Revolution literally invented the “left” and “right” seating arrangement in parliament. It was never about morals, it was about factions of elites fighting over who got to rule. The labels stuck because they work. Fast forward to today and it’s the same script with a shinier logo. Corporate media, political parties, even social media algorithms profit from your outrage, your tribalism, your clicks. And while you’re arguing over colours, policies that actually hurt everyone like mass surveillance, endless wars, corporate bailouts, food monopolies, housing crises, pass quietly in the background. The people at the top don’t care which flag you wave as long as you stay divided. If we actually moved like God was in the room 24/7, half this mess wouldn’t even exist. Because at that point you’re accountable to something higher than a party, a pundit, or a talking point. But morality doesn’t sell, division does. Stop playing on their chessboard. Stop wearing their jerseys. Start asking the real questions. The moment enough people stop seeing “left vs right” and start seeing “right vs wrong,” the whole game collapses. “Left vs Right” is a puppet show. The strings are money, the stage is media, and the audience is us tearing each other apart while the real thieves walk out the back door with the loot. It was never Left vs Right. It’s Top vs Bottom. The people vs the powerful. The day we stop fighting over colours and start uniting over truth, they lose everything.

87 17 replies
@Trip-ef9hw 2025-09-29

"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell, 1984

72

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot