The Case Is Weak—So Why Is Birthright Citizenship a Close Call? (w/ Elliot Williams) | Illegal News
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Broadview Six Case Ended in Total Disaster for Trump’s DOJ (w/ Mary McCord) | Illegal News
The Bulwark
127.5k views
Andrew Weissmann: Trump's Slush Fund Isn't Just Corrupt—It's a Crime | Illegal News
The Bulwark
10.1k views
How in the World Does Kash Patel Still Have a Job? (w/ Ben Wittes) | Illegal News
The Bulwark
24.2k views
Jerome Powell is Fueled by Pure Righteous Anger—And We LOVE IT (w/ Andrew Weissmann) | Illegal News
The Bulwark
113.5k views
Every Lawyer in America is Laughing at Todd Blanche (w/ Kate Shaw) | Illegal News
The Bulwark
186.9k views
America Looks Weak Right Now (w/ Bill Kristol) | The Bulwark Podcast
The Bulwark
29.4k views
Kash Patel's Lawsuit Could Backfire—BIG TIME (w/ Andrew Weissmann) | Illegal News
The Bulwark
211.9k views
Wait Until You See the Attorney General Contenders (w/ Elliot Williams) | Illegal News
The Bulwark
18.9k views
Trump Knows His Election Order is Illegal. That’s the Point! (w/ Andrew Weissmann) | Illegal News
The Bulwark
215.2k views
Analyzing the arguments as Supreme Court hears birthright citizenship case
PBS NewsHour
117.5k views
Top Comments (10)
That McDonalds suit was legit. Look up her burns. It was horrific.
Anyone that says the McDonalds coffee case was ridiculous doesn't know the details of the case I'm sorry.
Someone really should check the case of the woman and the hot coffee. There is way more to the story and she 100% had a case.
FYI, if you really read about the woman who sued about the hot coffee, it wasn't really frivolous, and she did initially try to just get assistance with the related medical costs for her burns on her lap caused by coffee that was kept way above temperature, but McD would not help. The situation was nothing like the red hats. It's worth reading about.
Mind you the lady that sued McDonald’s : 79-year-old Stella Liebeck suffered third-degree burns on 16% of her body, including her inner thighs and groin, after spilling McDonald's coffee, which was served at a dangerously hot 180–190°F. The injuries required skin grafts and hospitalization, sparking a landmark lawsuit that highlighted corporate negligence over safety. So this was in fact NOT a frivolous lawsuit
wtf? the woman with the coffee was legit. it's documented.
There is a documentary on the "hot coffee" case and what Sarah and Elliott are portraying here about that case and why the lady sued is nonsense. The case was not at all about her trying to sue for damages and if you take the time to watch that documentary you understand how manipulated public opinion on that case was.
That lawsuit with the lady who burned herself with the coffee was NOT a frivolous lawsuit. Look at the case before you parrot every other idiot who demeaned that woman. Nobody looks it up when they bring that case up.
I was going to add my comment about the McDonald’s lawsuit. But it seems this audience is well educated in the matter. Proud of you all. Sarah, do better.
The McDonald's coffee lawsuit was actually a serious one. The coffee was so hot the woman was severely injured and hospitalized for more than week. It was not frivolous, unless you believed the comedians of the time. Look it up.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
That McDonalds suit was legit. Look up her burns. It was horrific.
Anyone that says the McDonalds coffee case was ridiculous doesn't know the details of the case I'm sorry.
Someone really should check the case of the woman and the hot coffee. There is way more to the story and she 100% had a case.
FYI, if you really read about the woman who sued about the hot coffee, it wasn't really frivolous, and she did initially try to just get assistance with the related medical costs for her burns on her lap caused by coffee that was kept way above temperature, but McD would not help. The situation was nothing like the red hats. It's worth reading about.
Mind you the lady that sued McDonald’s : 79-year-old Stella Liebeck suffered third-degree burns on 16% of her body, including her inner thighs and groin, after spilling McDonald's coffee, which was served at a dangerously hot 180–190°F. The injuries required skin grafts and hospitalization, sparking a landmark lawsuit that highlighted corporate negligence over safety. So this was in fact NOT a frivolous lawsuit
wtf? the woman with the coffee was legit. it's documented.
There is a documentary on the "hot coffee" case and what Sarah and Elliott are portraying here about that case and why the lady sued is nonsense. The case was not at all about her trying to sue for damages and if you take the time to watch that documentary you understand how manipulated public opinion on that case was.
That lawsuit with the lady who burned herself with the coffee was NOT a frivolous lawsuit. Look at the case before you parrot every other idiot who demeaned that woman. Nobody looks it up when they bring that case up.
I was going to add my comment about the McDonald’s lawsuit. But it seems this audience is well educated in the matter. Proud of you all. Sarah, do better.
The McDonald's coffee lawsuit was actually a serious one. The coffee was so hot the woman was severely injured and hospitalized for more than week. It was not frivolous, unless you believed the comedians of the time. Look it up.