We Need to Delete 500 Years of Fake History - Lance Weaver, DemystifySci #370
Geologist Lance Weaver Proposes Deleting 500 Years from Ancient Egyptian Chronology
Challenge four centuries of accepted ancient history using evidence from radical new textual analysis and flaws in scientific dating methods. Discover how King David’s empire may align perfectly with Egyptian dynasties currently separated by 500 years.
Short Summary
- Eliminate 500 years of assumed history in the Near East, unifying Biblical timelines with Egyptian records.
- Identify systematic errors built into the mainstream chronology derived from Manetho and corrupted by religious bias.
- Reframe the Hyksos invasion as the Amalekites conquered by King David, resolving the archaeological gap for David’s reign.
- The Kolbrin Bible serves as a crucial, albeit obscure, anchor for developing this Revised Egyptian Chronology (REC).
Host Anastasia and Shiloh introduce geologist Lance Weaver (LW) to discuss his proposal for rewriting the ancient world timeline. LW argues that standard dating, rooted in Manetho (3rd century BC) and skewed by early religious interpretation (Josephus linking Hyksos to Moses), creates a 500-year mismatch between Egyptian and Biblical first millennium BC records. LW uses the Kolbrin Bible and known limitations in radiocarbon dating (like the Holstat Plateau effect) to propose compressing this period, suggesting a more homogeneous, transnational civilization operated across Canaan and Egypt simultaneously.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Every Belly Fat Study in the Last 5 Years (how to shrink it)
Thomas DeLauer
32.9k views
The Darkest State of the Union in Years (w/ Susan Glasser) | The Bulwark Podcast
The Bulwark
111.2k views
How Fasting Science has Changed in the Past 5 Years (no more 16:8)
Thomas DeLauer
47.1k views
The Crazy History of Sprite and Government Fraud | Unsubscribe Podcast 246
UnsubscribePodcast
115.7k views
Wes Moore unlikely path to history, keys to change, faith over fear and Baltimore Ravens| The Pivot
The Pivot Podcast
215.4k views
AI Expert: We Have 2 Years Before Everything Changes! We Need To Start Protesting! - Tristan Harris
The Diary Of A CEO
240.3k views
Jeff Teague's HILARIOUS STORY of trying to win the lottery to RETIRE FROM THE NBA | Club 520
Club 520 Podcast
116.7k views
Where Biology Goes Off the Rails - Dr. Michael Levin, DemystifySci #369
The DemystifySci Podcast
27.4k views
Hidden Payoff of Civilizational Ruin - Dr. Dani Sulikowski, DemystifySci #360
The DemystifySci Podcast
40.7k views
5 Fake Items That ALMOST Fooled the Pawn Stars!
HISTORY
141.4k views
Top Comments (10)
This was my whole reason for becoming a Yale College Archaeologist 50 years ago: the Biblical/Sumerian/Egyptian timeline problem, and it is just getting attention again today. Dating is screwed up in other places, including reliance on certain dating methodologies where various constants are variable with catastrophic cyclical events (good to see Velikovsky mentioned, as he should be).
Loosing the library of Alexandria was catastrophic to conversations like this.
The fact that this topic appears *so* controversial, especially after reading through the comments and seeing how many different theories and ideas are in competition for trying to make sense of human chronology, really highlights the need for much more of these discussions. It's terribly unfortunate but we may never know, thanks to the combination of ancient historians and political blocs who inserted false data, or covered up/obfuscated real data. It gets very murky very quickly.
I'm not a geologist and as soon as I saw where the ice cap was located during the younger dryas, I knew something was off. Then I found out they were pulling preserved mammoths out of permafrost, and I was positive that we are missing something.
It's always so interesting how the mainstream will call someone a racist for suggesting knowledge may have been shared amongst civilisations, but it's not racist when archeologists completely discount the indigenous legends and myths....
DemystifySci take a look at Anatoly Timofeevich Fomenko a Soviet and Russian professor of Mathematics at Moscow State University, a topologist and member of the Russian Academy of Sciences. He is a painter and illustrator of original artworks inspired by topological objects and structures. His books argue that that Medieval chronology has been manipulated, so DemystifySci Podcast if youre interested in these writings, find a proponent of Femenkos theories to interview , it may cause a moment of pause for you and the viewers, regards from a conspiracy connoisseur
Listen on the go at all podcast locations: https://anchor.fm/demystifysci Support the arts! If you have a record player, order our new album on vinyl: https://demystifysci-shop.fourthwall.com/products/vinyl-lp-secretary-of-nature-everything-is-so-good-here Sign up for a chance to present YOUR theory on Paradigm Drift: https://demystifysci.com/paradigm-drift-show
I so enjoyed listening to this. Thanks
I love smart people! Thank you for sharing!
Some very thought-provoking ideas, good to hear, thanks for sharing! What a great idea to focus on world-changing theories, we need more of this type of discussion! Keep up the good work. I like Lance's thinking, it's clear he's put a lot of time and effort into figuring out some of these difficult dilemmas in history. He seems very honest and genuine, which is sorely lacking in research fields these days. Also, not directly related to the video topic, but I was surprised to hear Lance arguing for newer dates of the pyramids, around the New Kingdom? I'd be curious to hear how he arrives at such dating. It's very clear they did not have the sophistication, no records of tools anywhere close to the level of sophistication needed. But we do have evidence of very sophisticated tools being used, such as circular saws, advanced drills, and signs of technology we don't quite understand or have at this point in our civilization. Things like the stone vases and massive 1,000+ ton megaliths should conclusively lead us to admit the Egyptians were not capable of this. I would HIGHLY recommend checking out Ben's UnchartedX channel to bring yourself up to speed on the arguments here. He has done some phenomenal work in this field, showing many obvious pieces of evidence that lead to what I think is the most reasonable conclusion: the Egyptians inherited these massive megalithic structures. If you posit the earth being very old, and humanity with it, then you realize this is not at all a wild claim, but completely feasible. We've developed some pretty wild tech in just maybe 10,000 years or so, imagine if a culture pre-ice age had 20,000+ years...
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
This was my whole reason for becoming a Yale College Archaeologist 50 years ago: the Biblical/Sumerian/Egyptian timeline problem, and it is just getting attention again today. Dating is screwed up in other places, including reliance on certain dating methodologies where various constants are variable with catastrophic cyclical events (good to see Velikovsky mentioned, as he should be).
Loosing the library of Alexandria was catastrophic to conversations like this.
The fact that this topic appears *so* controversial, especially after reading through the comments and seeing how many different theories and ideas are in competition for trying to make sense of human chronology, really highlights the need for much more of these discussions. It's terribly unfortunate but we may never know, thanks to the combination of ancient historians and political blocs who inserted false data, or covered up/obfuscated real data. It gets very murky very quickly.
I'm not a geologist and as soon as I saw where the ice cap was located during the younger dryas, I knew something was off. Then I found out they were pulling preserved mammoths out of permafrost, and I was positive that we are missing something.
It's always so interesting how the mainstream will call someone a racist for suggesting knowledge may have been shared amongst civilisations, but it's not racist when archeologists completely discount the indigenous legends and myths....
DemystifySci take a look at Anatoly Timofeevich Fomenko a Soviet and Russian professor of Mathematics at Moscow State University, a topologist and member of the Russian Academy of Sciences. He is a painter and illustrator of original artworks inspired by topological objects and structures. His books argue that that Medieval chronology has been manipulated, so DemystifySci Podcast if youre interested in these writings, find a proponent of Femenkos theories to interview , it may cause a moment of pause for you and the viewers, regards from a conspiracy connoisseur
Listen on the go at all podcast locations: https://anchor.fm/demystifysci Support the arts! If you have a record player, order our new album on vinyl: https://demystifysci-shop.fourthwall.com/products/vinyl-lp-secretary-of-nature-everything-is-so-good-here Sign up for a chance to present YOUR theory on Paradigm Drift: https://demystifysci.com/paradigm-drift-show
I so enjoyed listening to this. Thanks
I love smart people! Thank you for sharing!
Some very thought-provoking ideas, good to hear, thanks for sharing! What a great idea to focus on world-changing theories, we need more of this type of discussion! Keep up the good work. I like Lance's thinking, it's clear he's put a lot of time and effort into figuring out some of these difficult dilemmas in history. He seems very honest and genuine, which is sorely lacking in research fields these days. Also, not directly related to the video topic, but I was surprised to hear Lance arguing for newer dates of the pyramids, around the New Kingdom? I'd be curious to hear how he arrives at such dating. It's very clear they did not have the sophistication, no records of tools anywhere close to the level of sophistication needed. But we do have evidence of very sophisticated tools being used, such as circular saws, advanced drills, and signs of technology we don't quite understand or have at this point in our civilization. Things like the stone vases and massive 1,000+ ton megaliths should conclusively lead us to admit the Egyptians were not capable of this. I would HIGHLY recommend checking out Ben's UnchartedX channel to bring yourself up to speed on the arguments here. He has done some phenomenal work in this field, showing many obvious pieces of evidence that lead to what I think is the most reasonable conclusion: the Egyptians inherited these massive megalithic structures. If you posit the earth being very old, and humanity with it, then you realize this is not at all a wild claim, but completely feasible. We've developed some pretty wild tech in just maybe 10,000 years or so, imagine if a culture pre-ice age had 20,000+ years...