Loop Quantum Gravity WAR!
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Avi Loeb: What Is 3I/ATLAS?
Dr Brian Keating
56.9k views
Avi Loeb's WARNING: Watch Out for THIS When 3i/ATLAS Nears The Sun!
Dr Brian Keating
54.9k views
Does Avi Loeb Have PROOF of Alien Technology?
Dr Brian Keating
78.3k views
Avi Loeb Reveals 9 Strange Features of 3I/ATLAS
Dr Brian Keating
419.9k views
David Deutsch: The Quantum Theory No One Dares Explain!
Dr Brian Keating
51.6k views
The Quantum Secret Einstein Tried to Warn Us About
Dr Brian Keating
36.6k views
Avi Loeb: 3I/ATLAS Could Be ALIEN Technology
Dr Brian Keating
108.1k views
Jeffery Epstein, UFOs, Secrets: Revolt? Eric Weinstein & Avi Loeb
Dr Brian Keating
101.2k views
Quantum Gravity Is A Mental Disorder! (ft. Eric Weinstein)
Dr Brian Keating
180.5k views
How Do We Go Beyond Einstein? Eric Weinstein and Avi Loeb
Dr Brian Keating
107.2k views
Top Comments (10)
Sabine just dropped a blistering diss track
People should stop being offended. If someone said your theory sucks, it's up to you either to prove it does not suck or ignore him. But being emotionally offended is not an option.
As a Brit I would like to contribute some of my own expertise : "bollocks" are spherical objects usually seen in pairs that orbit one another in a kind of nebula-like sac that is gravitationally locked to the pillar of creation.
Sabine just published a video and brought the dilemma of modern physics to the point. I can just repeat what I wrote in her channel: I work with a couple of highly educated, PhD. holding physicists together at Siemens. They all complain about the situation you explain here and they are all pointing to the root cause: It's about the money. People construct fancy theories to pretent progress. Why would else one give them money? It starts at the universities. Modern physics is dead and that will remain till the system gets changed.
why the background music.....it's incredibly annoying and distracting
I have a theory it is called "gravity loop quantum string field" to satisfy both parties.
After watching Sabineโs last and the latest video, I feel whoever disagree with her should try to point out the flaw in her argument, if there is any. As someone who studied a bit physics during undergrad, i feel her argument is pretty clean and conclusive.
I'm not a physicist, but an applied mathematician, which should make my bias obvious. Remember going to lots of talks on this topic during my PhD and postdoc. Even back then, I always thought how on earth all these labs pull in funding without even having a plan for verifiable results. My personal opinion is that creating new math is like creating art. It can be beautiful and elegant, and has value. But with limited funding, I'd rather see resources being put towards more practical endeavours.
What is the best candidate for a Theory of Quantum Gravity: String Theory or Loop Quantum Gravity? Or something else?
Team Sabine.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan โข All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Sabine just dropped a blistering diss track
People should stop being offended. If someone said your theory sucks, it's up to you either to prove it does not suck or ignore him. But being emotionally offended is not an option.
As a Brit I would like to contribute some of my own expertise : "bollocks" are spherical objects usually seen in pairs that orbit one another in a kind of nebula-like sac that is gravitationally locked to the pillar of creation.
Sabine just published a video and brought the dilemma of modern physics to the point. I can just repeat what I wrote in her channel: I work with a couple of highly educated, PhD. holding physicists together at Siemens. They all complain about the situation you explain here and they are all pointing to the root cause: It's about the money. People construct fancy theories to pretent progress. Why would else one give them money? It starts at the universities. Modern physics is dead and that will remain till the system gets changed.
why the background music.....it's incredibly annoying and distracting
I have a theory it is called "gravity loop quantum string field" to satisfy both parties.
After watching Sabineโs last and the latest video, I feel whoever disagree with her should try to point out the flaw in her argument, if there is any. As someone who studied a bit physics during undergrad, i feel her argument is pretty clean and conclusive.
I'm not a physicist, but an applied mathematician, which should make my bias obvious. Remember going to lots of talks on this topic during my PhD and postdoc. Even back then, I always thought how on earth all these labs pull in funding without even having a plan for verifiable results. My personal opinion is that creating new math is like creating art. It can be beautiful and elegant, and has value. But with limited funding, I'd rather see resources being put towards more practical endeavours.
What is the best candidate for a Theory of Quantum Gravity: String Theory or Loop Quantum Gravity? Or something else?
Team Sabine.