What remains scarce after AGI? – Alex Imas and Phil Trammell
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Grant Sanderson (@3blue1brown) – AI and the future of math
Dwarkesh Patel
75.9k views
What does the next training paradigm look like?
Dwarkesh Patel
49.5k views
The data black hole at the center of AI
Dwarkesh Patel
31.1k views
Sarah Paine - Why Russia and China can't escape geography
Dwarkesh Patel
14.5k views
Chip design from the bottom up – Reiner Pope
Dwarkesh Patel
25.6k views
How GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini are actually trained and served – Reiner Pope
Dwarkesh Patel
55.4k views
🚨 Kash Patel in the HOT SEAT after WHCD SHOOTING
Legal AF
137.7k views
Jensen Huang – Will Nvidia’s moat persist?
Dwarkesh Patel
153.3k views
What are we scaling?
Dwarkesh Patel
22.3k views
Sarah Paine – Why Russia Lost the Cold War
Dwarkesh Patel
136.4k views
Top Comments (10)
Just lost to New York, needed this. Thanks!
13:30 bad example because singing became automated too with recordings. People love music so much that a world without recordings would probably employ millions of musicians
Well, the question is, if a significant amount of the doctor job (for example) gets automated, which thing happens: 1. The doctor spends more time per patient, 2. The hospital owners try to have more patients per doctor, 3. Both, and price difference determines which one any patient gets. Because that doctor's freed up time could go to either more patients, or to more time with each patient. Btw, "time with patient" isn't just some kind of emotional support, but could relate to detecting earlier signals of chronic disease, and similar things that most doctors just don't have time to prioritize currently. Translate that to every job: what increases in terms of human output: quality, quantity, or both? If we assume that profitability (capital demand) is the primary constraint, then either we have quantity with lower price, or quality with higher price. Interestingly, this merely expands a dynamic already at play; the trend of offloading more tasks to nurses could be seen as another version of "automation."
If economists can't predict the future, their model of economics is wrong. That's how we do things in science you build confidence in a model by showing it can predict. What you can't do is say hey we're bad at predicting but listen to us anyway
Have been loving the newer videos. You get better as you go.
This was a fantastic discussion. Thank you for sharing!
Thank you so much for sharing this with us ❤️
Amazing interview. Really interesting to hear from people who understand both economics and AI. 46:00 I actually expected the opposite. In a world where AI produces vast material wealth, then people with higher preference for interacting with AI would benefit from some of that wealth and have more resources to raise children (you only need one mate, you don't need to interact exclusively with humans).
great podcast! would have liked it to be 3 hours. bring them back!
great timing, this is the right conversation
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Just lost to New York, needed this. Thanks!
13:30 bad example because singing became automated too with recordings. People love music so much that a world without recordings would probably employ millions of musicians
Well, the question is, if a significant amount of the doctor job (for example) gets automated, which thing happens: 1. The doctor spends more time per patient, 2. The hospital owners try to have more patients per doctor, 3. Both, and price difference determines which one any patient gets. Because that doctor's freed up time could go to either more patients, or to more time with each patient. Btw, "time with patient" isn't just some kind of emotional support, but could relate to detecting earlier signals of chronic disease, and similar things that most doctors just don't have time to prioritize currently. Translate that to every job: what increases in terms of human output: quality, quantity, or both? If we assume that profitability (capital demand) is the primary constraint, then either we have quantity with lower price, or quality with higher price. Interestingly, this merely expands a dynamic already at play; the trend of offloading more tasks to nurses could be seen as another version of "automation."
If economists can't predict the future, their model of economics is wrong. That's how we do things in science you build confidence in a model by showing it can predict. What you can't do is say hey we're bad at predicting but listen to us anyway
Have been loving the newer videos. You get better as you go.
This was a fantastic discussion. Thank you for sharing!
Thank you so much for sharing this with us ❤️
Amazing interview. Really interesting to hear from people who understand both economics and AI. 46:00 I actually expected the opposite. In a world where AI produces vast material wealth, then people with higher preference for interacting with AI would benefit from some of that wealth and have more resources to raise children (you only need one mate, you don't need to interact exclusively with humans).
great podcast! would have liked it to be 3 hours. bring them back!
great timing, this is the right conversation