Terence Tao – Kepler, Newton, and the true nature of mathematical discovery
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Grant Sanderson (@3blue1brown) – AI and the future of math
Dwarkesh Patel
75.9k views
The data black hole at the center of AI
Dwarkesh Patel
31.1k views
The Discovery of the Sperm Whale Phonetic Alphabet
Anton Petrov
83.2k views
Major Discovery on the Origin of Life Found Inside a Korean Crater
Anton Petrov
47.2k views
New Discovery Breaks Biological Definition of Life
Anton Petrov
39.9k views
The Department of War is making a huge mistake.
Dwarkesh Patel
35.5k views
Do We Need New Math to Understand the Universe? With Terence Tao
StarTalk
95.0k views
Dario Amodei — “We are near the end of the exponential”
Dwarkesh Patel
41.0k views
Major Discoveries About the Origins of Medieval Plague
Anton Petrov
51.5k views
Ilya Sutskever – We're moving from the age of scaling to the age of research
Dwarkesh Patel
55.6k views
Top Comments (10)
He needs no introduction, and doesn't get one ❤
Tao seemed clearly uncomfortable with the way you described Kepler as if he were simply “trying random things.” That makes Kepler sound arbitrary or careless, which is misleading. Before he had the decisive observational data, Kepler was already working within a serious mathematical and astronomical project: he was trying to uncover an underlying order in planetary motion. His early ideas were speculative, but they were not random. What made his work decisive was that, once confronted with precise observations, he kept revising those models until they matched the data.
Time to cancel the Friday plans I didn’t have!
Im so triggered by this video not being one second longer.
To see someone at the top of their game be so kind and humble is a beautiful thing.
No way! You are on a roll!
1:07:31 “… we don’t have enough data on how math or science develops. We have one timeline of history, and we have maybe 100 turning points in this timeline. If we had access to a million alien civilizations, each with a different development of history and science in different orders, then maybe we’d actually have a decent shot at understanding how we measure what progress is and what’s a good strategy.” The most mind-bending premise of a speculative sci-fi story I have heard in a while.
Terrance and 3Blue1Brown have incredible videos on the Cosmic Distance Ladder, and Kepler's contribution. Marvel after marvel.
Dawkesh needs to realize with interviewing that less is often more. He would do better at understanding what is being said than running off with his own impressions of problems.
What an honor to have someone of his caliber on the pod! Great conversation.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
He needs no introduction, and doesn't get one ❤
Tao seemed clearly uncomfortable with the way you described Kepler as if he were simply “trying random things.” That makes Kepler sound arbitrary or careless, which is misleading. Before he had the decisive observational data, Kepler was already working within a serious mathematical and astronomical project: he was trying to uncover an underlying order in planetary motion. His early ideas were speculative, but they were not random. What made his work decisive was that, once confronted with precise observations, he kept revising those models until they matched the data.
Time to cancel the Friday plans I didn’t have!
Im so triggered by this video not being one second longer.
To see someone at the top of their game be so kind and humble is a beautiful thing.
No way! You are on a roll!
1:07:31 “… we don’t have enough data on how math or science develops. We have one timeline of history, and we have maybe 100 turning points in this timeline. If we had access to a million alien civilizations, each with a different development of history and science in different orders, then maybe we’d actually have a decent shot at understanding how we measure what progress is and what’s a good strategy.” The most mind-bending premise of a speculative sci-fi story I have heard in a while.
Terrance and 3Blue1Brown have incredible videos on the Cosmic Distance Ladder, and Kepler's contribution. Marvel after marvel.
Dawkesh needs to realize with interviewing that less is often more. He would do better at understanding what is being said than running off with his own impressions of problems.
What an honor to have someone of his caliber on the pod! Great conversation.