Navigate Select ESC Close

Trump COVER UP Gets SHUTDOWN by Federal Judge in NEW Ruling

2025-12-25 Entertainment
40.0k
3.7k
133
Legal AF
Legal AF
1.1m subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/@LegalAFMTN?sub_confirmation=1 Brian Kabateck and Shant Karnikian discuss Judge Jia Cobb's 73-page ruling blocking ICE's policy requiring members of Congress to give seven days' advance notice before visiting detention facilities. Twelve House Democrats sued after being repeatedly denied access to ICE facilities where they're constitutionally entitled to conduct oversight. The case centers on Section 527 of the Continuing Appropriations Act, which states "Nothing in this section may be construed to require a member of Congress to provide prior notice of the intent to enter a facility for the purpose of conducting oversight." ICE argued the seven-day notice requirement was needed for "security, logistics, and operational efficiency," and claimed field offices weren't covered since they don't technically "house" detainees. Judge Cobb rejected both arguments, finding ICE's policy "contrary to law and in excess of DHS's statutory authority." The hosts explain this is about separation of powers—Congress appropriates taxpayer money for ICE operations and therefore has the right to inspect how that money is used through unannounced visits, just like health inspectors conducting surprise restaurant checks. The policy emerged after Rep. LaMonica McIver was arrested and charged with assault during a June visit to a Newark facility (charges the hosts call "total bullshit"). The ruling reinforces that the executive branch cannot unilaterally redefine statutory language or block Congress from its oversight duties, with the hosts noting this creates legal precedent preventing future administrations from similar overreach. Kabateck LLP: Call 1-844-74-CIVIL for a free case evaluation or visit us at https://www.kbklawyers.com/ Legal AF Substack: https://substack.com/@legalaf Follow Legal AF on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/legalafmtn.bsky.social Follow Michael Popok on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/mspopok.bsky.social Subscribe to the Legal AF by MeidasTouch podcast here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/legal-af-by-meidastouch/id1580828595

Top Comments (10)

@truthslayerone264 2025-12-25

Anytime a judge rules against them because of the law, they say the judge is an extreme leftist because they don’t agree with them.

67 3 replies
@denisesutter1139 2025-12-25

Merry Christmas to the Legal AF Team! We appreciate you all...

51
@dawnjohnson8739 2025-12-25

Wow! Took a year.

47
@mervynmundy2385 2025-12-25

It's basic Quality Engineering 101, you don't tell the shop floor when the inspection is going to happen. You don't tell the person, I'm going to test the next item you make. It's was worked out decades.

46
@zhanejohnson6667 2025-12-25

🎉 Yayyyyyy you tell them Judge, tell how the boss and fight those random bullies back 💯% E-yup agreed 👏👏👏💙🎉😆👊

33
@ShirleyFarley-ot3ug 2025-12-25

Thank you 💙 💫

33
@sleejp 2025-12-25

💙💙Thank You. 💙💙

33
@dustoff499 2025-12-25

ICE is an illegal outfit as I see it. No legal agency behaves the way they have. They’re all criminals.

31
@vickysingh-y4h5t 2025-12-25

Child protective services can insect people's home in cases of child neglect & abuse concerns.

12
@petrajoseph2574 2025-12-25

It’s astounding how the DOJ defies the plain language of the Law! Great discussion

9

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot