LIVE Lawyer Reacts Bryan Kohberger Idaho Court Hearings
Related videos
LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Read Motion to Compel Hearing
Emily D. Baker
103.3k views
LIVE COURT | UT v. Kouri Richins - Motion Hearings Day 1
Emily D. Baker
75.9k views
ID v. Bryan Kohberger - Restitution Hearing From 11-5-25
Emily D. Baker
88.1k views
ID v Bryan Kohberger - Sentencing Hearing and Impact Statements
Emily D. Baker
301.3k views
ID. v Bryan Kohberger - He's Taking A PLEA?
Emily D. Baker
232.1k views
LIVE COURT | Legal Coverage Karen Read Motions Hearing.
Emily D. Baker
197.7k views
LIVE COURT | Legal Analysis of Bryan Kohberger Motions Hearing.
Emily D. Baker
195.3k views
LIVE COURT | Karen Read Pre-Trial Hearing, Motions and New Rulings.
Emily D. Baker
211.1k views
LIVE COURT | MA v. Karen Read - Motion to Dismiss Hearing
Emily D. Baker
289.4k views
LIVE COURT | MA v. Karen Read - Motion Hearing
Emily D. Baker
189.9k views
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Read Motion to Compel Hearing
Emily D. Baker
103.3k views
LIVE COURT | UT v. Kouri Richins - Motion Hearings Day 1
Emily D. Baker
75.9k views
ID v. Bryan Kohberger - Restitution Hearing From 11-5-25
Emily D. Baker
88.1k views
ID v Bryan Kohberger - Sentencing Hearing and Impact Statements
Emily D. Baker
301.3k views
ID. v Bryan Kohberger - He's Taking A PLEA?
Emily D. Baker
232.1k views
LIVE COURT | Legal Coverage Karen Read Motions Hearing.
Emily D. Baker
197.7k views
LIVE COURT | Legal Analysis of Bryan Kohberger Motions Hearing.
Emily D. Baker
195.3k views
LIVE COURT | Karen Read Pre-Trial Hearing, Motions and New Rulings.
Emily D. Baker
211.1k views
LIVE COURT | MA v. Karen Read - Motion to Dismiss Hearing
Emily D. Baker
289.4k views
LIVE COURT | MA v. Karen Read - Motion Hearing
Emily D. Baker
189.9k views
Top Comments (10)
Holyshit if there is no formal training then I am an Investigated Genealogist. Spent five years on my family tree. Down the rabbit hole of rabbit holes, got over 200 years on my father's father side, almost 230 years on my father's mother paternal side and another 200 years on her maternal side.
I just gotta say I love your show so much. Seriously brightens my day during hard and heavy times. You are an awesome person and I am so glad you’ve chosen this path. Love love love you and your show!
Replay crew 🤙🏻💜 I’m excited to finally hear from the DNA expert that Natalie Lawyer Chick speaks so highly of! Thanks for hosting us on EDB Airlines today 😘😘
I can't hear a word from the court, so I turn it up and BANG! Emily is shouting at me haha! I know I can watch it on other streams, but I want Emily's reaction/advice, but I feel like my math teacher is going to make me stand outside my own bedroom haha!
I love you EDB. When you said “Are you done yet? Omg please. Sir, you are very wise. It’s just like, I feel like we know.” I was thinking the same thing. Lol
As an adoptee I’ve done this process. I lucked out and a maternal uncle also tested, but I had my paternal tree built out already and my bio father was in it.
Gabriella Vargas did NOT admit to violating terms of service anywhere. What she said was the reasons given by OTHERS for having done so. These issues have been known for a while, and many in the genetic genealogy community are working to address them. It's more than terms of service however. The Department of Justice has an interim policy on how genetic genealogy can be used to solve a case that is supposed to govern the investigation. And it should be noted that it was the FBI who undertook the genetic genealogy investigation in this case (having taken it back from Othram Labs after Othram created the SNP sample). If the FBI did not follow the DOJ policy, and won't provide information to confirm they followed policy, that is very concerning.
My brain is actively tuning out the court audio because of the quality (yay auditory processing disorder + ADHD lol). Thank you EDB for covering it and making sure we got the good bits.
It was awesome to see you on the Depp v Heard Netflix documentary.
I thought Santa was gonna be too laid back. I WAS WRONG.😂
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Holyshit if there is no formal training then I am an Investigated Genealogist. Spent five years on my family tree. Down the rabbit hole of rabbit holes, got over 200 years on my father's father side, almost 230 years on my father's mother paternal side and another 200 years on her maternal side.
I just gotta say I love your show so much. Seriously brightens my day during hard and heavy times. You are an awesome person and I am so glad you’ve chosen this path. Love love love you and your show!
Replay crew 🤙🏻💜 I’m excited to finally hear from the DNA expert that Natalie Lawyer Chick speaks so highly of! Thanks for hosting us on EDB Airlines today 😘😘
I can't hear a word from the court, so I turn it up and BANG! Emily is shouting at me haha! I know I can watch it on other streams, but I want Emily's reaction/advice, but I feel like my math teacher is going to make me stand outside my own bedroom haha!
I love you EDB. When you said “Are you done yet? Omg please. Sir, you are very wise. It’s just like, I feel like we know.” I was thinking the same thing. Lol
As an adoptee I’ve done this process. I lucked out and a maternal uncle also tested, but I had my paternal tree built out already and my bio father was in it.
Gabriella Vargas did NOT admit to violating terms of service anywhere. What she said was the reasons given by OTHERS for having done so. These issues have been known for a while, and many in the genetic genealogy community are working to address them. It's more than terms of service however. The Department of Justice has an interim policy on how genetic genealogy can be used to solve a case that is supposed to govern the investigation. And it should be noted that it was the FBI who undertook the genetic genealogy investigation in this case (having taken it back from Othram Labs after Othram created the SNP sample). If the FBI did not follow the DOJ policy, and won't provide information to confirm they followed policy, that is very concerning.
My brain is actively tuning out the court audio because of the quality (yay auditory processing disorder + ADHD lol). Thank you EDB for covering it and making sure we got the good bits.
It was awesome to see you on the Depp v Heard Netflix documentary.
I thought Santa was gonna be too laid back. I WAS WRONG.😂