Navigate Select ESC Close

LIVE COURT | MA v. Karen Read - Motion Hearing

2025-03-04 Entertainment
189.9k
8.9k
537
Emily D. Baker
Emily D. Baker
866.0k subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

There are a number of hearings still pending and new filings. If you haven't seen this week's Emily Show, make sure to check it out. Today will be busy. If court is delayed, I will let you know. Make sure you have the Law Nerd App at https://www.lawnerdapp.com THE DOCKET 0:00 Welcome 4:30 The Hearing 8:15 Judge Talks About ARCCA Witnesses 19:50 Defense's Explanation 27:25 Defense Motion to Exclude Expert Witness James Crosby - Defense Arguments 1:12:55 Prosecution's Arguments 1:28:40 Defense's Rebuttal 1:46:52 Prosecution's Rebuttal 1:50:00 Defense Motion to Remove Some Testimony or Daubert Hearing of Expert Witness Robert Gilman - Meteorologist Ground Condition - Defense Arguments 2:04:23 Prosecution's Arguments 2:09:15 Defense's Rebuttal 2:16:25 Commonwealth's Motion to Impose Sanctions Against The Defense 2:19:24 Prosecution's Arguments 2:50:30 Defense's Arguments 3:04:30 Prosecution's Rebuttal 3:06:15 🚨 CODE RED 🚨 3:09:00 Defense's Rebuttal 3:10:00 Defense Motion to Amend Scheduling Order - Defense's Arguments 3:27:13 Motion to Exclude Dr. Woolf 3:29:20 Scheduling 3:33:32 Summary 3:45:05 Q&A RESOURCES In Case You Need Ambiance - https://www.youtube.com/live/hLMLCPX4zyA Get Our FREE App: https://www.lawnerdapp.com Or get our Email Alerts: https://www.LawNerdAlert.com Mailing Address: Emily D. Baker 2000 Mallory Ln. St. 130-185, Franklin TN 37067 Business Inquiries: [email protected] LAW NERD MERCH! https://www.LawNerdShop.com Help with the Law Nerd Shop go to https://www.lawnerdshop.com/pages/contact LONG-FORM CONTENT https://www.youtube.com/@TheEmilyDBaker The Emily Show Podcast on YouTube: https://emilydbaker.com/TheEmilyShowPlaylist Apple Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/AppleTheEmilyShow Spotify Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/SpofityTheEmilyShow On your favorite podcast player, Wednesdays QUICK CONTENT? Quick Bits Podcast: https://emilydbaker.com/quickbitsplaylist Quick Bits Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TheEmilyShow EMILY ON SOCIAL Instagram: https://www.Instagram.com/TheEmilyDBaker Twitter: https://www.Twitter.com/TheEmilyDBaker Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheEmilyDBaker *This video is not legal advice; it is commentary for educational and entertainment purposes. Some links shared are affiliate links; all sponsorships are stated in the video. Videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise noted. Sharing a resource is not an endorsement; it is a resource. Copyright 2020-2025 Baker Media, LLC*

Top Comments (10)

@jsthecat 2025-03-04

I wish that Judge C would be equally outraged by discovery issues on the prosecution side. 😡

375 12 replies
@wondergal4729 2025-03-04

I would really like to see Judge Canone admonish Brennan about his repeated misrepresentations followed by weak-ass "corrections." Even if that's all she does, it would be nice to see her actually address the drama he creates with his holier-than-thou attitude.

321 10 replies
@gobgoerrsarah 2025-03-04

As an actual geologist I’m confused because even if the ground was completely frozen it would never be as hard as a rock. It’s the water in soil that freezes. The actual minerals in the soil don’t become “more solid” that takes thousands upon thousands of years of lithification

218 12 replies
@zhyvaxxe 2025-03-04

I can only speak for myself, but what I think the LawTubers are missing when they explain the Court's anger at the defense is that that's not really the question. If I ask "why is the Judge so upset?" they explain why any given judge in any given case would be upset under these circumstances. But I get that. I understand that. I think the real question here isn't why would any other judge be upset? It's why *this* judge? Given her demonstrated IDGAF attitude towards all of the shenanigans by the prosecution, why is *this* judge specifically, in particular, suddenly so irritated at what is really the first misstep the defense has made, but hasn't even so much as momentarily raised an eyebrow at anything the prosecution has pulled so far?

210 15 replies
@zebbbbbb 2025-03-04

I didn't think anyone could annoy me more than Adam Whatifsortofkindofanythig Lally, but Hank Counterfactual Brennan and his incredible hypocricy is certainly getting there.

189 5 replies
@deltawoolery1669 2025-03-04

Brenan lost me when he disparage Dr Russell's intellect and ability to write her own report. It was a sh1tty thing to say. Utterly disgusting!

179 5 replies
@juliemaring6048 2025-03-04

I believe today proved we DO NOT HAVE A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD IN THIS CASE. Something is very, VERY wrong and it includes the judge, the prosecutor, and a group working behind the scenes.

115 2 replies
@Montana_Lil 2025-03-04

As if Alessi googles anything! Google googles Alessi when they want to know something!!!

111 5 replies
@beepboop8374 2025-03-04

Why does the judge ask for page numbers of everything the defense says but when Brennan’s response to everything is “oh there’s tons of stuff in my written statement to the court!” the judge doesn’t ask for specific pages.

102 4 replies
@christinao522 2025-03-04

Seems this judge long ago forgot that her primary function is to ensure Karen Read gets a fair trial. Or maybe respecting long-standing and universally-accepted principles of justice just “isn’t how we do it here in Massachusetts…”

65 2 replies

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot