LIVE COURT | MA v. Karen Read - Motion Hearing
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Read - Emergency Hearing - The Wrongful Death case pops off.
Emily D. Baker
120.2k views
LIVE COURT | SC v. Alex Murdaugh - First Retrial Hearing
Emily D. Baker
83.5k views
LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Read Motion to Compel Hearing
Emily D. Baker
103.3k views
LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Read Wrongful Death Case | Hearing to Compel Colin Albert Deposition.
Emily D. Baker
98.3k views
LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Karen Read - Proctors' Procrastination Emergency Hearing Afternoon - Part 2
Emily D. Baker
83.6k views
LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Karen Read - Proctors' Procrastination Emergency Hearing Morning - Part 1
Emily D. Baker
141.1k views
LIVE | Karen Read sues MSP & Canton! Plus New Court Hearing in Civil Case!
Emily D. Baker
123.3k views
LIVE COURT | Karen Read Civil Discovery Hearings & Wild New Proctor Problems
Emily D. Baker
107.6k views
LIVE COURT | UT v. Kouri Richins - Motion Hearings Day 1
Emily D. Baker
75.9k views
LIVE COURT | UT v. Kouri Richins - Pre-Trial Hearing and Motions.
Emily D. Baker
66.9k views
Top Comments (10)
I wish that Judge C would be equally outraged by discovery issues on the prosecution side. 😡
I would really like to see Judge Canone admonish Brennan about his repeated misrepresentations followed by weak-ass "corrections." Even if that's all she does, it would be nice to see her actually address the drama he creates with his holier-than-thou attitude.
As an actual geologist I’m confused because even if the ground was completely frozen it would never be as hard as a rock. It’s the water in soil that freezes. The actual minerals in the soil don’t become “more solid” that takes thousands upon thousands of years of lithification
I can only speak for myself, but what I think the LawTubers are missing when they explain the Court's anger at the defense is that that's not really the question. If I ask "why is the Judge so upset?" they explain why any given judge in any given case would be upset under these circumstances. But I get that. I understand that. I think the real question here isn't why would any other judge be upset? It's why *this* judge? Given her demonstrated IDGAF attitude towards all of the shenanigans by the prosecution, why is *this* judge specifically, in particular, suddenly so irritated at what is really the first misstep the defense has made, but hasn't even so much as momentarily raised an eyebrow at anything the prosecution has pulled so far?
I didn't think anyone could annoy me more than Adam Whatifsortofkindofanythig Lally, but Hank Counterfactual Brennan and his incredible hypocricy is certainly getting there.
Brenan lost me when he disparage Dr Russell's intellect and ability to write her own report. It was a sh1tty thing to say. Utterly disgusting!
I believe today proved we DO NOT HAVE A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD IN THIS CASE. Something is very, VERY wrong and it includes the judge, the prosecutor, and a group working behind the scenes.
As if Alessi googles anything! Google googles Alessi when they want to know something!!!
Why does the judge ask for page numbers of everything the defense says but when Brennan’s response to everything is “oh there’s tons of stuff in my written statement to the court!” the judge doesn’t ask for specific pages.
Seems this judge long ago forgot that her primary function is to ensure Karen Read gets a fair trial. Or maybe respecting long-standing and universally-accepted principles of justice just “isn’t how we do it here in Massachusetts…”
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
I wish that Judge C would be equally outraged by discovery issues on the prosecution side. 😡
I would really like to see Judge Canone admonish Brennan about his repeated misrepresentations followed by weak-ass "corrections." Even if that's all she does, it would be nice to see her actually address the drama he creates with his holier-than-thou attitude.
As an actual geologist I’m confused because even if the ground was completely frozen it would never be as hard as a rock. It’s the water in soil that freezes. The actual minerals in the soil don’t become “more solid” that takes thousands upon thousands of years of lithification
I can only speak for myself, but what I think the LawTubers are missing when they explain the Court's anger at the defense is that that's not really the question. If I ask "why is the Judge so upset?" they explain why any given judge in any given case would be upset under these circumstances. But I get that. I understand that. I think the real question here isn't why would any other judge be upset? It's why *this* judge? Given her demonstrated IDGAF attitude towards all of the shenanigans by the prosecution, why is *this* judge specifically, in particular, suddenly so irritated at what is really the first misstep the defense has made, but hasn't even so much as momentarily raised an eyebrow at anything the prosecution has pulled so far?
I didn't think anyone could annoy me more than Adam Whatifsortofkindofanythig Lally, but Hank Counterfactual Brennan and his incredible hypocricy is certainly getting there.
Brenan lost me when he disparage Dr Russell's intellect and ability to write her own report. It was a sh1tty thing to say. Utterly disgusting!
I believe today proved we DO NOT HAVE A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD IN THIS CASE. Something is very, VERY wrong and it includes the judge, the prosecutor, and a group working behind the scenes.
As if Alessi googles anything! Google googles Alessi when they want to know something!!!
Why does the judge ask for page numbers of everything the defense says but when Brennan’s response to everything is “oh there’s tons of stuff in my written statement to the court!” the judge doesn’t ask for specific pages.
Seems this judge long ago forgot that her primary function is to ensure Karen Read gets a fair trial. Or maybe respecting long-standing and universally-accepted principles of justice just “isn’t how we do it here in Massachusetts…”