LIVE | Kohberger Motion to change venue Granted. Kari Morrissey isn't done yet.

This judge is never going to let anyone drink coffee in her presence, never mind her courtroom, ever again.

Kari Morrissey is the human embodiment of “the limit does not exist.”

There comes a time when you have to leave your ego at the door and Kari can’t do that, sadly. Let it go is an important lesson to learn, one Lally and many other prosecutors need to.

I honestly feel courts streaming the proceedings, and not allowing media to record in the courtroom is the most appropriate. It does serve to prevent prejudicial or even predatory filiming, helps protect family members and any victims in the gallery, and ensures a more accurate record.

Kari Morrissey should lawyer for Sarah Boone - they're both great at whining about everything in long motions

19:25 Spiro's "Does she have an objection or is she just talking?" was very on-point.

How to prove true the Baldwin attorney’s opening statement that “prosecutors chased the shiny object” without admitting it? File two motions for reconsideration of a dismissal *with prejudice*.

Re Kohberger case. Having been in the same situation as the parents of the victims of this case (not as a parent but as a sibling however) I have to say, it shocks me that the parents are given so much cache - despite them feeling they are being ignored. This seems to be an American thing. Where I come from no one gets to talk with abandon about a case yet to be determined. Let alone before a jury has been chosen. It's frustrating, but you have to trust in your judicial system (unless you're in Massachussets). I will miss Judge Judge...I think he is a very fair judge....and I'll miss saying Judge Judge.

While I really do feel for the victims' families, and victims of crimes more generally, it makes sense that the defendant's rights have to always be a priority. For the very simple reason of what if they're innocent? In any criminal case, I think people need to remember that defendants are presumed to be innocent - the idea isn't that a murderer has more rights. The idea is that a *presumably innocent* person is being accused of murder, and so their rights need to be protected

I 100% understand where the family is coming from. However, you have to presume the defendant is innocent and imagine an innocent person, being threatened with execution by the State, knowing that the people around him believe him to be guilty and are willing to sentence him to not only remove his liberty, but his life. These rules are just cuz the system doesn't care about victims (tho in many cases this is true and a Problem) but to limit State power and prevent innocent people from being deprived of their basic rights based on public sentiment