Navigate Select ESC Close

LIVE | Karen Read Defense's New Filing. 4 Jurors speak, what happens next. TikTok Psychic won't stop

2024-07-16 Entertainment
249.5k
14.7k
466
Emily D. Baker
Emily D. Baker
865.0k subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

THE DOCKET 0:00 Welcome Alec Baldwin 11:25 Road So Far 21:20 Tech Problems 30:20 Q&A Karen Read 33:40 Road So Far 39:00 Supplemental Motion 1:00:00 Response of the Commonwealth 1:50:00 About Polling The Jury on page 13 2:05:09 Summary 2:13:40 Defense's Newest Filing In Response to the Commonwealth 2:55:30 Summary 2:59:00 Q&A TikTok Psychic Defamation Case Updates 3:07:30 Road So Far 3:13:15 Request for Reassignment of Judge 3:18:00 Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgement 4:03:45 Plaintiff's Opposition to Judge Reassignment 4:08:00 Defendant Requests Reassignment Again 4:09:21 Plaintiff's Response to Alter the Judgement 4:18:14 Defendant's Second Motion for Reassignment 4:20:10 Q&A 4:24:00 Summary 4:26:20 Q&A Get Our FREE App: https://www.lawnerdapp.com Don’t miss our Email Alerts: https://www.LawNerdAlert.com WHAT I USE TO STREAM - STREAMYARD: https://streamyard.com/emily Proud Streamyard Partner! Mailing Address: Emily D. Baker 2000 Mallory Ln. St. 130-185, Franklin Tn 37067 Business Inquiries: [email protected] LAW NERD MERCH! https://www.LawNerdShop.com Help with the shop: [email protected] LONG-FORM CONTENT https://www.youtube.com/@TheEmilyDBaker The Emily Show Podcast on YouTube: https://emilydbaker.com/TheEmilyShowPlaylist Apple Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/AppleTheEmilyShow Spotify Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/SpofityTheEmilyShow On your favorite podcast player, Wednesdays QUICK CONTENT? Quick Bits Podcast: https://emilydbaker.com/quickbitsplaylist Apple Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/AppleQuickBits Spotify Podcasts: https://emilydbaker.com/SpotifyQuickBits Quick Bits Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@TheEmilyShow EMILY ON SOCIAL Instagram: https://www.Instagram.com/TheEmilyDBaker Twitter: https://www.Twitter.com/TheEmilyDBaker Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheEmilyDBaker *This video is not legal advice; it is commentary for educational and entertainment purposes. Some links shared are affiliate links; all sponsorships are stated in the video. Videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise noted. Sharing a resource is not an endorsement; it is a resource. Copyright 2020-2024 Baker Media, LLC*

Top Comments (10)

@jennifersandahl4603 2024-07-16

I’m angry for Karen Read. The court should have been more forthcoming. As a layperson who has served on a jury, I wouldn’t know to ask or think to—especially with how off-handed Bev was. Also, her instructions were over an hour long. I would not have been able to follow that personally. The court seemed to bend over backwards for the protection of the case—without protecting Karen Read’s constitutional rights or her right to “innocent until proven guilty”

371 41 replies
@lseh 2024-07-16

Juries don't know how things work so the court should be more responsible with holding their hands and be proactive in asking these questions to ensure everyone is on the same page.

217 7 replies
@shazstar13 2024-07-16

And I wonder if the judge’s verbal instruction that they should consider Karen guilty if her actions LEAD to John’s death, so the jury MIGHT consider her guilty because she dropped him off. Which is ridiculous.

170 14 replies
@Raymail-tj4cf 2024-07-16

I’m not a lawyer but as a “ jury person “ I thought Judge Bev said don’t fill out the jury slip until they finish all. This is a Judge issue not a jury issue. In my opinion.

169 8 replies
@shazstar13 2024-07-16

I honestly think if the CW doesn’t dismiss the charges, and if the judge doesn’t hold a hearing, the jurors will go to the media - likely as a cohesive unit. I know I would.

148 3 replies
@NancyD_If_You_Please 2024-07-17

Everyone is presuming these ordinary citizens understood the nuances of trial procedure and law. They THOUGHT they would be sent back because they EXPECTED the judge to make the inquiry as to where they were. To penalize the defendant because the ordinary citizen didn’t understand the unwritten rules (unwritten for them) is a travesty.

97 3 replies
@david-bo2mo 2024-07-17

So lemme get this right...the commonwealth is saying that the defense waived their right by not asking for the jury to be asked about the split/polling the jury BUT ALSO states that doing that exact thing is coercion and isn't allowed...

47 2 replies
@screamingcats72 2024-07-17

I think Bev created an environment where the jurors didn’t feel comfortable asking. He strict time cut offs and the semi-condescending way she spoke to the jurors made it feel like, to me, that no one should speak unless spoken to. The attorneys have dealt with it and even they were hesitant at times.

39
@elc4885 2024-07-17

But bev TOLD them not to give anyone OR even her her ANY information about count until they were unanimous. She did not say unanimous on all or some but they were following those instructions.

16
@OMGKitteh88 2024-07-17

The fact that Yanetti asked for a hung jury to be announced, doesn't mean that defense didn't want/expect a judge to poll on charges. Bev just said "mistrial" and sent off the jury. ???

16

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot