Live | Trooper Proctor FIRED! Will Karen Read's Docuseries hurt her case??
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Read - Emergency Hearing - The Wrongful Death case pops off.
Emily D. Baker
120.2k views
LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Read Motion to Compel Hearing
Emily D. Baker
103.3k views
LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Karen Read - Proctors' Procrastination Emergency Hearing Afternoon - Part 2
Emily D. Baker
83.6k views
LIVE COURT | O'Keefe v. Karen Read - Proctors' Procrastination Emergency Hearing Morning - Part 1
Emily D. Baker
141.1k views
LIVE | Karen Read sues MSP & Canton! Plus New Court Hearing in Civil Case!
Emily D. Baker
123.3k views
LIVE COURT | Karen Read Civil cases back in court for discovery fights.
Emily D. Baker
73.3k views
Kouri Richins wants a new sentencing date. Karen Read Federal Case, Proctor's wild request.
Emily D. Baker
80.1k views
LIVE COURT | Karen Read Civil Discovery Hearings & Wild New Proctor Problems
Emily D. Baker
107.6k views
Karen Read v Proctor, Tully, McCabes, Alberts and more. They are all getting sued.
Emily D. Baker
190.3k views
Discovery Hearings on Trooper Proctor Texts. What's getting turned over.
Emily D. Baker
134.9k views
Top Comments (10)
I've been to 34 Fairview and that yard is SO small. There is no way 11 people missed a body on the lawn. Absolutely no way.
Massachusetts has gained one point for actually firing Proctor. They’re still in the negative numbers though.
Proctor's wife doesn't believe in professional integrity, ethics, personal accountability, or moral decency... apparently. Girl, he's _your_ husband and he's talking about other women that way. You're raising kids with that. So sick of the "boys will be boys" type nonsense. John deserved a real investigation by real investigators, who actually gave a ship and knew how to do their job. 🥤 Step away from the Kool-aid, Mrs. Proctor.
It's astounding that they all clearly remember "I hit him, I hit him, I hit him!" None of them can remember anything else.
BALLOON KNOT was all I needed to hear to make a judgement on Proctor and his character
Is the meticulous and thorough investigation in the room with us? 👀
Wouldn't it be great if Procter came out and blew the whistle about all his corruption? It's not like he's got a job to protect. Wishful thinking
Your comments about people in this not feeling "excited" about this going back to trial rang really true for me. I'm so invested in this case. I can't stop watching but it really makes me sick to my stomach to see what is going on. Karen Read could be anyone and it's really heartbreaking to see.
This whole "investigation," gathering of evidence, and witness statements are all trash 🗑. That alone would be enough for me to acquit 🤷🏾♀️
Michigan attorney here—in Michigan, Proctor could face criminal charges for obstruction of justice, neglect of duty, and perhaps tampering with evidence. There might be other potential charges but these are the ones that come to mind. I don’t know what potential charges exist under Massachusetts laws, but I imagine they have similar statutes. Yes, he could claim the protections of the 5th Amendment. That is a complicated issue that the court and attorneys would have to sort out, maybe on a question by question basis. His former testimony may be admissible in that he would be unavailable if he claims the 5th. The attorneys would have to fight that issue out, especially in light of the new information about his firing.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
I've been to 34 Fairview and that yard is SO small. There is no way 11 people missed a body on the lawn. Absolutely no way.
Massachusetts has gained one point for actually firing Proctor. They’re still in the negative numbers though.
Proctor's wife doesn't believe in professional integrity, ethics, personal accountability, or moral decency... apparently. Girl, he's _your_ husband and he's talking about other women that way. You're raising kids with that. So sick of the "boys will be boys" type nonsense. John deserved a real investigation by real investigators, who actually gave a ship and knew how to do their job. 🥤 Step away from the Kool-aid, Mrs. Proctor.
It's astounding that they all clearly remember "I hit him, I hit him, I hit him!" None of them can remember anything else.
BALLOON KNOT was all I needed to hear to make a judgement on Proctor and his character
Is the meticulous and thorough investigation in the room with us? 👀
Wouldn't it be great if Procter came out and blew the whistle about all his corruption? It's not like he's got a job to protect. Wishful thinking
Your comments about people in this not feeling "excited" about this going back to trial rang really true for me. I'm so invested in this case. I can't stop watching but it really makes me sick to my stomach to see what is going on. Karen Read could be anyone and it's really heartbreaking to see.
This whole "investigation," gathering of evidence, and witness statements are all trash 🗑. That alone would be enough for me to acquit 🤷🏾♀️
Michigan attorney here—in Michigan, Proctor could face criminal charges for obstruction of justice, neglect of duty, and perhaps tampering with evidence. There might be other potential charges but these are the ones that come to mind. I don’t know what potential charges exist under Massachusetts laws, but I imagine they have similar statutes. Yes, he could claim the protections of the 5th Amendment. That is a complicated issue that the court and attorneys would have to sort out, maybe on a question by question basis. His former testimony may be admissible in that he would be unavailable if he claims the 5th. The attorneys would have to fight that issue out, especially in light of the new information about his firing.