US Considers ATACMS as Ukraine's Offensive Struggles + Problems to Come
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Continuity of Agenda: Trump Commits to Ukraine
The New Atlas
39.0k views
Ukraine's Exhausted Army Crumbles as West Considers Intervention
The New Atlas
103.3k views
President-Elect Trump, the War in Ukraine, & Continuity of Agenda
The New Atlas
71.0k views
Ukraine's Kursk Offensive Accelerating Ukraine's Collapse
The New Atlas
234.8k views
New ATACMS airbase plan as Ukraine offensive plan fades
The Duran
130.9k views
Russia Resumes Massive Missile Strikes as Ukraine Continues to Rely on Deadly, Senseless PR Stunts
The New Atlas
146.5k views
US Proxy Wars: Ukraine Crumbles, Gaza Burns, as Tensions Rise in Asia-Pacific
The New Atlas
97.6k views
US Shapes Philippines into Southeast Asia's "Ukraine"
The New Atlas
75.7k views
Ukraine Uses ATACMS as Offensive Culminates, Israeli Military Targets Civilians Ahead Urban Op
The New Atlas
84.0k views
The New Atlas LIVE: Scott of Kalibrated on Ukraine's Faltered Offensive, Funding & Arms Shortages
The New Atlas
72.1k views
Top Comments (10)
"We got more missiles than we thought" sounds like "We got some old crap lying around that we haven't dismantled yet."
My guess is the U.S. has long had policymakers who wanted to send ATACMS to Ukraine, but other policymakers who did NOT want to. The former are starting to win the debate, and the U.S. needs an excuse for the change of heart. So they have the "we just found more ATACMS than we thought we had" excuse. It's indicative of the internal policy debates.
Ukraine has taken Robotyne about 15 times so far. Guess they must be swapping it between their own Brigades, so EVERYBODY gets a turn to "take Robotyne"
The difference is that Russian advances do not come with massive casualties and they do not attempt to take what they can not hold. The supply lines of the Ukrainian advances in the South are stretched across open country, constantly under attack. Any attempts to reinforce those forward positions will have to travel for a considerable distance enduring massive casualties. The Russian defenders can steadily withdraw to prepared defences and wait for winter to destroy their attackers.
the Ukraine way of using long range weapons in this war was always making symbolic attacks hitting cities, airports and civilian infrustructure. I have no doubt that if they had ATACMS, it goes the same way
Abrams delayed, F-16's "coming", ATACMS.. All these "game changers" , not changing anything.
😀 Clear Analysis/Report 😃
Damn BB putting in work!
Oh look! They were under the bed!
Wonder Weapons = You wonder when American and European citizens will scream "ENOUGH!" Nutty Nuland won't be handing out cookies this time!😅
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
"We got more missiles than we thought" sounds like "We got some old crap lying around that we haven't dismantled yet."
My guess is the U.S. has long had policymakers who wanted to send ATACMS to Ukraine, but other policymakers who did NOT want to. The former are starting to win the debate, and the U.S. needs an excuse for the change of heart. So they have the "we just found more ATACMS than we thought we had" excuse. It's indicative of the internal policy debates.
Ukraine has taken Robotyne about 15 times so far. Guess they must be swapping it between their own Brigades, so EVERYBODY gets a turn to "take Robotyne"
The difference is that Russian advances do not come with massive casualties and they do not attempt to take what they can not hold. The supply lines of the Ukrainian advances in the South are stretched across open country, constantly under attack. Any attempts to reinforce those forward positions will have to travel for a considerable distance enduring massive casualties. The Russian defenders can steadily withdraw to prepared defences and wait for winter to destroy their attackers.
the Ukraine way of using long range weapons in this war was always making symbolic attacks hitting cities, airports and civilian infrustructure. I have no doubt that if they had ATACMS, it goes the same way
Abrams delayed, F-16's "coming", ATACMS.. All these "game changers" , not changing anything.
😀 Clear Analysis/Report 😃
Damn BB putting in work!
Oh look! They were under the bed!
Wonder Weapons = You wonder when American and European citizens will scream "ENOUGH!" Nutty Nuland won't be handing out cookies this time!😅