Navigate Select ESC Close

The Worst Anti-Cheat Ever

2024-10-25 Science & Technology
65.6k
1.9k
299
ThePrimeTime
ThePrimeTime
1.1m subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

Recorded live on twitch, GET IN ### Article https://x.com/zebleerpo/status/1847024778600689706 By: https://x.com/zebleerpo ### My Stream https://twitch.tv/ThePrimeagen ### Best Way To Support Me Become a backend engineer. Its my favorite site https://boot.dev/?promo=PRIMEYT This is also the best way to support me is to support yourself becoming a better backend engineer. MY MAIN YT CHANNEL: Has well edited engineering videos https://youtube.com/ThePrimeagen Discord https://discord.gg/ThePrimeagen Have something for me to read or react to?: https://www.reddit.com/r/ThePrimeagen Kinesis Advantage 360: https://bit.ly/Prime-Kinesis Get production ready SQLite with Turso: https://turso.tech/deeznuts

Top Comments (10)

@Trichobezoar_ 2024-10-25

I do love how nearly every AAA multiplayer game has a deeply rooted in your system anticheat, yet fails to do some basic server 'input sanitization'. Like this man has been spinning at a gagillion RPM, moving faster than than character speed limit and is going through coordinates that are clearly walls, "seems good to me, everything is working as intended" says the server

298 29 replies
@Omnifarious0 2024-10-25

Getting people permanently banned isn't exactly funny. What would be funny is if COD ended up with no players because their anti-cheat is so stupid that it banned them all.

56 3 replies
@minikame2272 2024-10-25

It's dick behaviour but it also never should've been possible. The financial liability for this imho is Activision's fault, because this isn't a 'could happen to anyone' issue. It is the product of negligence AND an insufficient appeal system with human overview. Companies are not entitled to fully automated product aftercare. These bans should have been minor temporary inconveniences at most.

50 7 replies
@ktxed 2024-10-25

A server-side anticheat incurs unwanted costs to the game publisher. Hence: horrible local spyware-enabled anticheats.

40 1 replies
@Artoooooor 2024-10-25

Banning without appeal should be punishable...

12
@Harteavecmoi 2024-10-25

If it wasn't for this person making a stink about this issue, it could've gone months without being addressed, leading to many people being permanently banned unjustly for longer periods of time.

6
@Exilum 2024-10-25

About the chatter that mentioned DMAs, they are the reason why some devices don't work with Valorant running. If a device's type can't be identified by Vanguard, it just cuts it off, disabling any connectivity and drivers. And for device types it identifies, it regularly scans its behavior for signs of misbehavior. So if a device doesn't fit an approved shape (as in presents itself as an input device, a drive, a network card, a sound card, or anything identifiable) it's not able to run, and if anything doesn't behave like its category suggests, it's detected and you're part of the next ban wave. Basically 1984 in the computer.

3
@acharris 2024-10-25

This is one major reason why I prefer to play single-player games

2
@ContagiousRepublic 2024-10-26

Trolls WILL weaponize all the lazy anticheat patterns.

1
@SoundSafariParty 2024-10-26

Some classic “works on my machine so ship it 🚢“

0

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot