AIMM: A model for thinking about AI and Work
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
r/AITA for Thinking My Friend is a Predator?
rSlash
72.3k views
Thinking About Charlie Kirk
Theo Von
2.8m views
Building Your Own Unified AI Assistant Using Claude Code
Unsupervised Learning
248.1k views
Trump has NIGHTMARE Morning and THINKS ABOUT DYING
MeidasTouch
626.1k views
AI NEWS: Self-learning AI, Crazy AI Ads, and More ChatGPT Updates
Matt Wolfe
103.8k views
We've Been Wrong About Carbs for Building Muscle (glad I learned this)
Thomas DeLauer
87.4k views
How Rich People THINK About Money (And Why It Works)
Minority Mindset
57.2k views
Meta's Reasoning AI Model... Reasons Without Using Words?
bycloud
71.8k views
Superman Flying Backlash Reveals Way More About Fandom Than You Think
Reel Rejects
29.9k views
7 Rules For Learning to Code in 2025...and should you?
Tech With Tim
81.9k views
Top Comments (7)
I’m curious, you put workflows at 3, but I see workflows as a chain of sorta set actions while the agent is much more self sufficient long running and adaptable So my question is: why do you see workflows as 3 and not 2 I get the documenting of it, but much of those blue parts is made up of lots of choices and different kinds of actions that depend on the context. Humans are good at undertstanding the context, talking to other humans and then imputing missing information and remembering information. I rather want an agent than a pipeline. That matches the strong parts of a human. The hurdle I see is currently talking to humans naturally, getting context and remembering information for a long time and working continuously for months. If that gets solved for devs to build easily, then we get into solving knowledge jobs and their complex workflows.
I can't seem to get the voices to run consistently like you do. Love your videos btw
Fascinating walk through and take on the escalating agentic capability and usage by everyone, but more specifically cyber attackers and defenders stages at the end. Great model to think through. No doubt AI Workflows at Level 3 are already in use, but Anthropic's delineation shows that Level 2 attackers are ahead of the curve with commodity AI tools and a few bucks. Path of least resistance for attackers will be the easiest choice, and this only shows us the need is very real for defenders to implement strategies and tools that actually work to defend.
Loving you videos Daniel...another very insightful one!
This is a custom GUI using Grafana? How to set up my own?
I really appreciate your insight and knowledge. I’ve been using Claude Code for about three weeks now, and the file permanence plus local interactivity has completely changed how I use AI. You mentioned getting everyone at work on agentic AI “like Kai.” What does that look like in your mind? For example, if someone is on a Security team, what would you have an agent like that doing?
5 AI shell. AI surrounds the human and becomes human extension.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (7)
I’m curious, you put workflows at 3, but I see workflows as a chain of sorta set actions while the agent is much more self sufficient long running and adaptable So my question is: why do you see workflows as 3 and not 2 I get the documenting of it, but much of those blue parts is made up of lots of choices and different kinds of actions that depend on the context. Humans are good at undertstanding the context, talking to other humans and then imputing missing information and remembering information. I rather want an agent than a pipeline. That matches the strong parts of a human. The hurdle I see is currently talking to humans naturally, getting context and remembering information for a long time and working continuously for months. If that gets solved for devs to build easily, then we get into solving knowledge jobs and their complex workflows.
I can't seem to get the voices to run consistently like you do. Love your videos btw
Fascinating walk through and take on the escalating agentic capability and usage by everyone, but more specifically cyber attackers and defenders stages at the end. Great model to think through. No doubt AI Workflows at Level 3 are already in use, but Anthropic's delineation shows that Level 2 attackers are ahead of the curve with commodity AI tools and a few bucks. Path of least resistance for attackers will be the easiest choice, and this only shows us the need is very real for defenders to implement strategies and tools that actually work to defend.
Loving you videos Daniel...another very insightful one!
This is a custom GUI using Grafana? How to set up my own?
I really appreciate your insight and knowledge. I’ve been using Claude Code for about three weeks now, and the file permanence plus local interactivity has completely changed how I use AI. You mentioned getting everyone at work on agentic AI “like Kai.” What does that look like in your mind? For example, if someone is on a Security team, what would you have an agent like that doing?
5 AI shell. AI surrounds the human and becomes human extension.