West's "New" Strategy for Ukraine Victory: Same as the Old One & Why it Can't Work...
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
New US Administration, New Wonder Weapons for Ukraine
The New Atlas
50.5k views
Ukraine's Exhausted Army Crumbles as West Considers Intervention
The New Atlas
103.3k views
Western Media Admits Ukraine is Losing
The New Atlas
69.6k views
Ukraine's "Victory Plan" Implies NATO Intervention
The New Atlas
57.8k views
Western Narratives Unravel in Ukraine Including Ukraine's Black Sea "Victory"
The New Atlas
128.9k views
NEOCONS search for VICTORY narrative in Ukraine
The Duran
118.6k views
The West's "Theory of Victory" in Ukraine: Convincing Ukraine to Fight a Futile War
The New Atlas
131.2k views
Russian Forces Return to Kharkov - Ukraine's Strategic Crisis Expands
The New Atlas
135.2k views
Ukraine’s Donbass Lines Collapsing - Russia’s Strategy of Attrition Comes Full Circle
The New Atlas
218.9k views
What's in Washington's Newest Ukraine Arms Package?
The New Atlas
76.8k views
Top Comments (10)
Name me once Ben Hodges was right about anything regarding military matters in Ukraine? These are the people we consider ”experts” in the collective west, it’s tragic!
Leningrad was completely surrounded for over two years by the Germans and it never capitulated. What makes anyone think severing the land bridge would cause Crimea to collapse? My goodness, the study of history and other cultures is absolutely dead in the U.S. and it shows with the absolute stupidity being displayed by the political and diplomatic class.
This is beyond ridiculous .. It's actually a war crime.
The Russians would look upon the loss of the Crimea as an existential threat to the Russian Federation. In this event, they have said that they would use nuclear weapons to preserve the integrity of the Russian state. This fact raises an interesting question, would the leaders of the collective West risk losing New York, Manchester, Munich, or Lyon, for the sake of who will eventually rule Crimean peninsula?
As always from me. Get the NEOCONS & ZIONISTS out of Power and the World has a chance at Peace. From a Pensioner age 68. From Swindon. England.🧐😟
Thank you Brian Berletic for always being a good source of information on Ukraine and other geopolitical topics. God bless.
Great analysis as usual Brian. Thanks for your work in exposing U.S foreign policy hypocrisy and its desire for hegemony.
Is it just me, or does the FP article seem to be suggesting more terror attacks on the bridge that Russia does not use for military logistics? That won't hurt Russia - it will cause reciprocal attacks which will weaken Ukraine even further.
The only way out, is when AND how the Russians decide
Russians play 3D chess....Nato plays Russian Roulette.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
Name me once Ben Hodges was right about anything regarding military matters in Ukraine? These are the people we consider ”experts” in the collective west, it’s tragic!
Leningrad was completely surrounded for over two years by the Germans and it never capitulated. What makes anyone think severing the land bridge would cause Crimea to collapse? My goodness, the study of history and other cultures is absolutely dead in the U.S. and it shows with the absolute stupidity being displayed by the political and diplomatic class.
This is beyond ridiculous .. It's actually a war crime.
The Russians would look upon the loss of the Crimea as an existential threat to the Russian Federation. In this event, they have said that they would use nuclear weapons to preserve the integrity of the Russian state. This fact raises an interesting question, would the leaders of the collective West risk losing New York, Manchester, Munich, or Lyon, for the sake of who will eventually rule Crimean peninsula?
As always from me. Get the NEOCONS & ZIONISTS out of Power and the World has a chance at Peace. From a Pensioner age 68. From Swindon. England.🧐😟
Thank you Brian Berletic for always being a good source of information on Ukraine and other geopolitical topics. God bless.
Great analysis as usual Brian. Thanks for your work in exposing U.S foreign policy hypocrisy and its desire for hegemony.
Is it just me, or does the FP article seem to be suggesting more terror attacks on the bridge that Russia does not use for military logistics? That won't hurt Russia - it will cause reciprocal attacks which will weaken Ukraine even further.
The only way out, is when AND how the Russians decide
Russians play 3D chess....Nato plays Russian Roulette.