Navigate Select ESC Close

A Penny Sized Opening. Perfectly Hollowed Walls. No Primitive Tool Did This.

2026-03-30 Entertainment
1.7k
104
40
The Cosmic Summit
The Cosmic Summit
193.0k subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

The CT scanning of ancient artifacts is revealing manufacturing details that surface examination and light scanning simply cannot access - and what Matt Beal is finding inside these objects is raising questions that the primitive tool argument cannot answer. One artifact in particular makes the problem concrete. The mouth opening is approximately the size of a penny. Yet the interior walls are hollowed with a precision that required a drill to initiate the process - evidenced by a small nub at the bottom of the object, the remnant of a drill core that couldn't be extracted once the hollowing was complete. That core has survived inside the artifact, preserved as direct physical evidence of the manufacturing sequence. How do you hollow out walls through an opening the size of a penny with primitive tools? Matt's answer is that you don't - and the CT scan confirms it. The metrological findings Matt draws from the scans add a second layer of significance. These artifacts were not produced by eye or by feel. They were measured - using the royal cubit system employed in the construction of the Great Pyramid, a unit of 52.4 centimeters divisible into hands and fingers down to 18.71 millimeters. That same system of measurement was applied with documented precision across the artifacts Matt has scanned. The objects were not arbitrarily sized. They were designed to specific dimensions within an ancient metrological framework - one precise enough that a CT scan conducted thousands of years later can still identify the unit of measure used to produce them.

Top Comments (9)

@finley.h 2026-03-30

There are claims that the privately owned vase is a forgery. The only way to put an end to this controversy is to determine the authenticity of the patina. For example, why not try carrying out the analysis proposed by Dr Max? Of course, I am well aware that this would require a vast amount of money. However, there is now the option of crowdfunding. If the patina is genuine rather than a forgery, the precision of the geometric shapes and the traces of tool marks beneath it date back at least several thousand years. 🙂✌️

5
@toddzillar1 2026-03-30

The people in power will never allow us common folk to learn the truth this will go nowhere like all other research on this topic

3 2 replies
@Blvkwvlf 2026-03-30

Just because you don't know how to do something it doesn't mean that other people don't know how to do it. So damn arrogant. Old Indian artisans in Mexico still make these and it takes them months to make one. You know what tool they use? A hook with a sharp end attached to a pedestal and lathe.

2 12 replies
@1800imawake 2026-03-30

They mastered what we call advanced wave theory physics and used lasers, masers, and sasers. Give me adequate funding that allows me to pick the right engineers, equipment to do it (very expensive), and authority for protection, and I can prove it. ---------->EDIT: Read my reply below in full and think for yourself instead of waiting for the gatekeepers to give you the answers because they probably never will.

2 11 replies
@angelstrawn5493 2026-03-30

There is a lot of missing information such as the provenance of these artifacts. The recent findings in South India point to a much earlier start of the iron age, sometime in the 3300 BCE. Iron tools make a lot of things possible. It ain't aliens, it ain't lasers, it ain't sonic cutting tools. It's humans learning to go from Neolithic hunter gatherers working with stones in ancient Anatolia to expert stone masons in Egypt and India, thousands of years later.

1 9 replies
@fergoka 2026-04-01

I know I know. Its copper chisels and stone, right?

1 1 replies
@NotMyOwn-xd5iu 2026-03-31

If you are only finding stones and sticks, they weren’t technology advanced…

0 5 replies
@jaydub225 2026-03-30

Ancient futurism. I don't believe modern ideas of advanced technology in ancient times. Complete balderdash. Lol.

0 3 replies
@8thsinner 2026-03-30

He is assuming the obelisk at the bottom has no function, mistakenly.

0

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot