Navigate Select ESC Close

George Beebe: US-Russia Agreement to End NATO Expansionism or Accept an Ugly Russian Victory

2025-10-22 People & Blogs
68.8k
2.5k
376
Glenn Diesen
Glenn Diesen
543.0k subscribers

Unlock all features

FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.

Description

George Beebe is Director of Grand Strategy at the Quincy Institute, and the former CIA Director for Russia Analysis. Beebe argues that the window of opportunity for an agreement that ends NATO expansionism is closing, and the alternative will be an ugly Russian victory. Follow Prof. Glenn Diesen: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@GDiesen1 Substack: https://glenndiesen.substack.com/ X/Twitter: https://x.com/Glenn_Diesen Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/glenndiesen Support the channel: PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/glenndiesen Buy me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/gdieseng Go Fund Me: https://gofund.me/09ea012f

Top Comments (10)

@mirekslechta7161 2025-10-22

I think USA´s army expanding closer to Moscow via new NATO member states and previous plans to add Ukraine in to NATO , it was also kind of agression toward Russia IMO. Therefore I wish country where I live (Czechia) would leave NATO , stop figting war on behalf of USA. Such a move from Czechia, Slovakia, Hungary and so on would bring peace and prosperity to Europe, we must not be helping the terrorist USA , USA is cancer , nothing better since they are provoking wars of all kinds, real wars, as well as economical wars....

126 18 replies
@haraldgundersen7303 2025-10-22

Thank you, Glenn, for your courage and commitment towards saving the planet. Appreciate it..

70
@delmarae100 2025-10-23

How on earth can Russia trust any agreement with the head clown show and their puppets? They cant!!

60 8 replies
@klaudioabazi4478 2025-10-22

More accurate would be an ugly NATO defeat.

59 5 replies
@tajabdullah.malaysia 2025-10-22

The problem is to put missiles closer to Moscow like putting missiles in Cuba or Mexico and Panama ❤🎉. 🇺🇸 NATO-LED Provoked first to blame Russian?

40 1 replies
@45Grace2009 2025-10-22

Bush Snr and the Russian leadership had an agreement that NATO would not move towards Russia. The US broke it. They never intended honouring it. The US doesn't think honouring agreements applies to them. The entire Ukraine project is a US proxy war. We all know it, Merkel wrote in her memoirs the entire deception. We can call Putin naive, but expecting international agreements to be entered into in good faith is surely a minimum requirement. The Western world is now controlled by a cabal of profit motivated control freaks with absolutely no humanity whatsoever. They follow a set of principles alien to the Christian and Muslim worlds. This cabal must be removed, and the financial infrastructure re-imagined.

20 3 replies
@AggieL48 2025-10-22

It wasn’t an INVASION, it’s an INTERVENTION!

17 8 replies
@SusanaCuratolo 2025-10-22

Good interview … thank you Dr Diesen!

14
@sonjaapich 2025-10-22

Letting them into the EU is a malicious trap. Russia is underestimating that risk.

10
@maxhunt6144 2025-10-23

The West wants to AVOID humiliating defeat. On the initial stages of this war when Russian goal was to use 200 000 contingent to spook Ukraine and bring it to negotiating table , the West decided that “war must go on…” and rhetoric was - “The fate of this war must be decided on the battlefield - no peace talks with Russia, we must defeat Russia”. Nowadays Russia is winning the war of attrition and Ukraine is running out of manpower… that is the reason the west is talking about the peace. Russia has the initiative and Putin can not just stop the war because it would mean a betrayal of own army!!!

8

Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge

  • Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
  • Chat with videos, export text & PDF
  • $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research

Free forever plan • All features unlocked

App screenshot