What Happens in the Brain When We See Art? | Jean-Pierre Changeux
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
What happens to Trump voters when Trump is gone?
David Pakman Show
16.0k views
The Truth About What Happened To The Iranian Women's Soccer Team!
Barry Cunningham
13.9k views
What Would Happen if the Moon Were 20 Times Closer?
StarTalk
71.4k views
What China's spies are doing in the U.S., and what happens when they're caught | 60 Minutes
60 Minutes
1.2m views
THIS Is Why We Can't Ignore What's Happening In South Africa
Ben Shapiro
251.6k views
What Happens When the Last Bitcoin is Mined? Explained
Coin Bureau
389.9k views
Here’s What Happened When I Tried to Spread the Truth at the DNC
Matt Walsh
811.9k views
David Chalmers - What Things are Conscious?
Closer To Truth
45.5k views
Andrei Linde - Are We Living in a Simulation?
Closer To Truth
47.3k views
What Happens When You Jump in an Airplane?
StarTalk
504.7k views
Top Comments (8)
in terms neuroscienc brains infer art is merely rethoric. Because the brain recognized paterners and meaning, is often struggles with ambiguity.
"A thought experiment on the nature of reality and the observer: If we look at String Theory's T-duality, it suggests that a universe of radius R \to 0 is physically equivalent to one where R \to \infty. This implies that absolute zero and true infinity converge. Imagine a piano: moving to the absolute lowest frequency (0/Void) or the absolute highest (\infty) eventually loops back on itself, where 0 = \infty. If we model reality with the conceptual framework -0 \leftrightarrow (0 = \infty) \leftrightarrow +0, the poles represent physical/mental duality (entropy/expenditure), while the center (0 = \infty) represents the dimensionless, pure awareness of the observer. Could it be that a true Theory of Everything is evading us because we are trying to use dimensional math to explain a dimensionless center point?"
*Jean-Pierre Changeux argues that art engages a uniquely wide network of brain processes, combining perception, emotion, creativity, and meaning.* Can neuroscience fully explain artistic creativity, or is there something about art that always exceeds scientific description?
I do mostly sculptures, i think in terms of proportion, imagination, and most importantly i have to like it, you can always cheat others with your effort, but real artist never cheat themselves, is like trial and error with beauty in mind, i rarely worry about the color, there should always be a concept first and everything else follows, i usually like blast music too, seems like a lot going in my mind, but the whole process from beginning to finish feels like an euphoric meditation as if my mind is empty and just following a flow
شكرا لك بروفسور جان🎉🎉
A review of occupational political leanings reveals that artists and text editors cluster overwhelmingly on the far left. This pattern suggests a fascinating link between cognitive style and political ideology. Artists and editors spend their lives managing ambiguity, weighing endless intricate choices, and navigating hyper-complex systems. This suggests that ideologies on the left may naturally attract those whose work demands constant cognitive fluidity, whereas right-leaning ideologies may align more with structured environments requiring less open-ended processing.
neuroscience can only identify the brain regions involved in the creative process...
NOTHING SPIN ONLY THE ENTANGLEMENT FUNCTION OF REALITY SHOWS THE ILLUSION OF MOVING OR WHILE IT IS JUST THE SPIN BEHAVE AS MOTION RAPIDLY, OYA REALITY WE SAW BY MY PAPPA KI BIG GOD WALI EYES🔔JOKES APART SERIOUSLY IN THEORITICAL PROJECTION🧘OF REALITY AS ALL SCIENTIFIC DID🚾SOOMDI MAI ATOM KI LOMDI PAKAD PAKAD KE TO SHOW C0NCL0USNESS DEKHO O ULLU C ATOM KA TIYA CHOTA KAR LAYE 🪔CHU CHU MAI MAI KI MENTAL HUSTLING
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (8)
in terms neuroscienc brains infer art is merely rethoric. Because the brain recognized paterners and meaning, is often struggles with ambiguity.
"A thought experiment on the nature of reality and the observer: If we look at String Theory's T-duality, it suggests that a universe of radius R \to 0 is physically equivalent to one where R \to \infty. This implies that absolute zero and true infinity converge. Imagine a piano: moving to the absolute lowest frequency (0/Void) or the absolute highest (\infty) eventually loops back on itself, where 0 = \infty. If we model reality with the conceptual framework -0 \leftrightarrow (0 = \infty) \leftrightarrow +0, the poles represent physical/mental duality (entropy/expenditure), while the center (0 = \infty) represents the dimensionless, pure awareness of the observer. Could it be that a true Theory of Everything is evading us because we are trying to use dimensional math to explain a dimensionless center point?"
*Jean-Pierre Changeux argues that art engages a uniquely wide network of brain processes, combining perception, emotion, creativity, and meaning.* Can neuroscience fully explain artistic creativity, or is there something about art that always exceeds scientific description?
I do mostly sculptures, i think in terms of proportion, imagination, and most importantly i have to like it, you can always cheat others with your effort, but real artist never cheat themselves, is like trial and error with beauty in mind, i rarely worry about the color, there should always be a concept first and everything else follows, i usually like blast music too, seems like a lot going in my mind, but the whole process from beginning to finish feels like an euphoric meditation as if my mind is empty and just following a flow
شكرا لك بروفسور جان🎉🎉
A review of occupational political leanings reveals that artists and text editors cluster overwhelmingly on the far left. This pattern suggests a fascinating link between cognitive style and political ideology. Artists and editors spend their lives managing ambiguity, weighing endless intricate choices, and navigating hyper-complex systems. This suggests that ideologies on the left may naturally attract those whose work demands constant cognitive fluidity, whereas right-leaning ideologies may align more with structured environments requiring less open-ended processing.
neuroscience can only identify the brain regions involved in the creative process...
NOTHING SPIN ONLY THE ENTANGLEMENT FUNCTION OF REALITY SHOWS THE ILLUSION OF MOVING OR WHILE IT IS JUST THE SPIN BEHAVE AS MOTION RAPIDLY, OYA REALITY WE SAW BY MY PAPPA KI BIG GOD WALI EYES🔔JOKES APART SERIOUSLY IN THEORITICAL PROJECTION🧘OF REALITY AS ALL SCIENTIFIC DID🚾SOOMDI MAI ATOM KI LOMDI PAKAD PAKAD KE TO SHOW C0NCL0USNESS DEKHO O ULLU C ATOM KA TIYA CHOTA KAR LAYE 🪔CHU CHU MAI MAI KI MENTAL HUSTLING