Patrick McGee - "Apple in China: The Capture of the World's Greatest Company" | The Daily Show
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Unlock all features
FREE: Get instant access to 10 AI summaries, chats, or transcripts per day.
Related videos
Do The Seahawks Have The Greatest Defense In NFL History?! | Pat McAfee Show
The Pat McAfee Show
116.4k views
Patrick Mahomes Tears ACL; Could This Be The End Of The Chiefs? | Pat McAfee Show
The Pat McAfee Show
121.6k views
"We Would Kick Any Other Podcast's Ass In Any Game!" | Pat McAfee Show
The Pat McAfee Show
76.5k views
Catherine Bracy - TechEquity & Venture Capital “World Eaters” | The Daily Show
The Daily Show
57.3k views
The Threat and Promise of AI | The Daily Show
The Daily Show
639.8k views
Michael Grunwald - Fixing Agriculture’s Climate Impact in "We Are Eating the Earth” | The Daily Show
The Daily Show
61.9k views
Where In The World Has Pat McAfee Been?!
The Pat McAfee Show
272.2k views
Christopher McDonald - Reprising the Role of Shooter McGavin in “Happy Gilmore 2” | The Daily Show
The Daily Show
254.2k views
Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong - “Truth and Trust” in Cancer Research & Journalism | The Daily Show
The Daily Show
332.3k views
How BP Became the World’s Most Dangerous Oil Company
ColdFusion
260.9k views
Top Comments (10)
I’m not entirely sure this chap isn’t Clark Kent.
When the host lets the guest talk, it’s magical
Have Patrick McGee come on the Daily Show once a month to discuss things with Jon, and I would watch every time!
Guy looks like a real life Milo from Atlantis: The Lost Empire
I don't know if people care about the flip side of the coin. But as a Chinese American, not much in this discussion is new to me. But it frustrates me quite a bit that no effort was made into talking about WHY Apple went to China in the first place beyond the surface level "cheap labor" claims. In the early 2000, dollar for dollar, China had the most educated, most efficient, most disciplined labor force in the world. And that took two decades to create after the end of the Cultural Revolution. You can get thousands upon thousands of young workers to work 12-hour shifts, 6 days a week, 11 month a year nonstop. Even other dictatorship countries could not come close to this level of efficiency. Compared to other developing countries, China also had solid infrastructure (water, electricity, transportation) to facilitate industrial scale productions. Plus all levels of governments were providing all kinds of incentives to foreign factories, from tax deductibles to utility credits, subsidies and education program. It would be outrageous if Apple did not choose China at the time. Before anyone try to blame Apple or China for this. Everyone that ever bought an Iphone in the past two decades benefitted from this system. Incidentally if you look at Apple's effort to move production to India, a lot of the issues are in infrastructure and labor efficiency. The India labor force today is not even as well coordinated as China twenty years ago. Two Points: 1. This type of industrial job is not coming back to the US, unless the US completely restructure its education system and social values. Due to tariffs, some Chinese companies have tried to open factories in the US. I know some people in those factories. The most common complaint is US worker efficiency not salary. Because everyone knew it's more expensive to hire US labors. But they were surprised to find out that Americans labors are operating at about 40-50% efficiency compared to Chinese labors. 2. China will never abandon such a well-oiled global scale production machine. They can change direction and produce different things, maybe trade up to higher end products, but no amount of external pressure is going to make China give it up. Ultimately, if push comes to shove, I think the Chinese leadership would rather ramp up military production and go to war, instead of surrendering China's existing manufacturing infrastructure.
watch it again and again. 6 months later. Buy the book ! It's so worth it.
I'm so glad Jon is back.
Between this interview and Jon's monologue, this might be one of the all-time greatest episodes of the daily show imo
One of the most important books of the 21st century that HAD TO be published. I am glad that Mr. McGee did it.
Now THAT is why Jon is such a great interviewer. He does his research ahead of time, asks poignant questions, and leads the interview without cutting people off or shutting down points they are trying to make. But, I personally think what might be even more important is that he adds some levity and energy, without making it feel like a cheap joke. In an interview like this, so many of the jokes or "outbursts" were not *really* directed at content or character. Like the "We were so close to being best friends!" bit. It's adding something that feels natural and isn't going to insult, offend, or demean.
Unlock the Data Inside
Turn Videos into Knowledge
- Get FREE 10/day: transcripts, summaries, chats
- Chat with videos, export text & PDF
- $1 free API credit for RAG, chatbots & research
Free forever plan • All features unlocked
Top Comments (10)
I’m not entirely sure this chap isn’t Clark Kent.
When the host lets the guest talk, it’s magical
Have Patrick McGee come on the Daily Show once a month to discuss things with Jon, and I would watch every time!
Guy looks like a real life Milo from Atlantis: The Lost Empire
I don't know if people care about the flip side of the coin. But as a Chinese American, not much in this discussion is new to me. But it frustrates me quite a bit that no effort was made into talking about WHY Apple went to China in the first place beyond the surface level "cheap labor" claims. In the early 2000, dollar for dollar, China had the most educated, most efficient, most disciplined labor force in the world. And that took two decades to create after the end of the Cultural Revolution. You can get thousands upon thousands of young workers to work 12-hour shifts, 6 days a week, 11 month a year nonstop. Even other dictatorship countries could not come close to this level of efficiency. Compared to other developing countries, China also had solid infrastructure (water, electricity, transportation) to facilitate industrial scale productions. Plus all levels of governments were providing all kinds of incentives to foreign factories, from tax deductibles to utility credits, subsidies and education program. It would be outrageous if Apple did not choose China at the time. Before anyone try to blame Apple or China for this. Everyone that ever bought an Iphone in the past two decades benefitted from this system. Incidentally if you look at Apple's effort to move production to India, a lot of the issues are in infrastructure and labor efficiency. The India labor force today is not even as well coordinated as China twenty years ago. Two Points: 1. This type of industrial job is not coming back to the US, unless the US completely restructure its education system and social values. Due to tariffs, some Chinese companies have tried to open factories in the US. I know some people in those factories. The most common complaint is US worker efficiency not salary. Because everyone knew it's more expensive to hire US labors. But they were surprised to find out that Americans labors are operating at about 40-50% efficiency compared to Chinese labors. 2. China will never abandon such a well-oiled global scale production machine. They can change direction and produce different things, maybe trade up to higher end products, but no amount of external pressure is going to make China give it up. Ultimately, if push comes to shove, I think the Chinese leadership would rather ramp up military production and go to war, instead of surrendering China's existing manufacturing infrastructure.
watch it again and again. 6 months later. Buy the book ! It's so worth it.
I'm so glad Jon is back.
Between this interview and Jon's monologue, this might be one of the all-time greatest episodes of the daily show imo
One of the most important books of the 21st century that HAD TO be published. I am glad that Mr. McGee did it.
Now THAT is why Jon is such a great interviewer. He does his research ahead of time, asks poignant questions, and leads the interview without cutting people off or shutting down points they are trying to make. But, I personally think what might be even more important is that he adds some levity and energy, without making it feel like a cheap joke. In an interview like this, so many of the jokes or "outbursts" were not *really* directed at content or character. Like the "We were so close to being best friends!" bit. It's adding something that feels natural and isn't going to insult, offend, or demean.